Quote:
Originally Posted by akelarumi
(1)it is an outdated game. (2)They have put all their money on gw2 and they are pulling it off there. They are keeping the gw1 servers alive untill it is not profitable anymore and maybe beyond that for sentimental reasons. (3) But expansions would mean for them admitting failure of gw2, and even though there are people who dislike gw2, it is commercially a success.
|
1: its an older game, doenst mean its outdated, as many people still buy GW (whether its cuz of GW2, or cuz they heard about it being good, or saw it and wanna try)
2: if they had put all their money in GW2, that'd be real stupid, so i doubt they did that
bnesides, i've seen some updates after GW2 got here... in GW
3: admitting failure by updating their older game?
does that mean windows vista and 7 are failures? cuz XP still is getting updated (i'm using XP)
thats 1 example, they just put alot of money into GW2 to make it work better (and still doing that), so now they have a "blackout" in using money
i think that if the playerbase is still big enough, and paying well for GW, that they may consider it
then again, it'll take a long while, as GW2 still is new, and so its bugged/glitched/imbalanced etc.
if GW is profitable enough, i'd say it'd be stupid if they let the playerbase, which is still here, die, if they can get money out of it
i'd totally buy another expansion from GW
updating an old game(GW) AND keeping updating a newer game(GW2) means they both do well, not that they admit failure for their newest game
enough companies with older and newer games, which still are updated, look at Perfect World, for example, their oldest game gets new stuff alot (PWi), both new items to buy AND new content