Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WeiPing
Well, isn't that a compelling post, gweden. Or maybe it's completely aimless and baseless...a futile, desperate grasping of straws hoping to retain some dignity by, ironically enough, using nothing more than insults and second hand opinons.
My point stands. The difference between the best equipment in the game and equipment that anyone can get without even a minute of farming at all is very small, and if you think that difference is "required", then you're just making excuses for yourself.
|
You have little understanding of true competition then if you think that 5% isn't a HUGE advantage. As much as you like to trumpet that skill is the "be all, end all" to winning, the bottom line is that at the highest levels of competition there is VERY little to distinguish between the best participants in sports or activities that require equipment. How many pro golfers are going to just buy a $100 beginner's set of clubs and win a PGA tour? How many race car drivers are gonna take a two season old car and expect to take the checkered flag?
Bottom line is that this game relies on equipment as a part of the game, whcih means that to improve your odds that 5% or 3% or even a meager 1% plays in heavily to your odds of winning more often than not.
Even in a game you consider more pure to skill, like say a first person shooter, you don't think that guys like fatal1ty aren't always looking for the fastest, best, most powerful equipment so that he can squeeze out a few extra frames per second so that he can play as smoothly as possible when the screen fills up with polys? Get real, the edge in equipment is a vital part of all competition.
Just so you know I'm not even PvP'ing right now but game theory has always fascinated me.