I must say I truly appreciate your help in this matter leprekan

Thomas Valheru
Ricebox
allience
Thomas Valheru
Niosisw
Originally Posted by Tainek
Anet isnt legally bound, they can turn your account access on and off at whim, and not be breaking any laws
|
leprekan
Originally Posted by Thomas Valheru
Sofar I've gotten 2 replies regarding my banning, the rest have been "we moved your ticket to the europe support" etc. I've been the epitome of politeness, hopefully this issue will atleast be resolved before the weekend, I've been of GW for about 6 days now
![]() And thanks for your support, need to stick togeother to fight the power |
Ricebox
Originally Posted by Thomas Valheru
Sofar I've gotten 2 replies regarding my banning, the rest have been "we moved your ticket to the europe support" etc. I've been the epitome of politeness, hopefully this issue will atleast be resolved before the weekend, I've been of GW for about 6 days now
![]() And thanks for your support, need to stick togeother to fight the power |
Stabber
Originally Posted by Niosisw
Quote:
"Well, we just wanted to ban his account. We think he did something wrong, but we have no proof or anything." |
Former Ruling
Thomas Valheru
leprekan
Originally Posted by Thomas Valheru
Yay, I finally talked to a GM, might have my account back today!
Free drinks for anyone who offered support, you in particular leprekan |
db0y
leprekan
Originally Posted by db0y
This is ridiculous, someone else also got "accidentally banned" at Tgh.
http://www.guild-hall.net/forum/showthread.php?t=39544 |
db0y
Originally Posted by leprekan
Now think about the fact there are more than 1 million copies of gw. Of that total only a TINY fraction even visit a fansite ... the number of actual bans has to be HUGE. This is a problem that should be addressed.
|
Thomas Valheru
twicky_kid
Originally Posted by Pandora's box
If you are 100% sure you can sue them. In that case they will have to prove that you violated the user agreement. If you win it won't cost you anything, and you will have your account back. If you loose however... Also you can contact a customer organization. No need to say its useless to try further if you're not 100% sure you are not to be blamed for violating the user agreement.
|
Thallandor
Ricebox
Originally Posted by Thomas Valheru
Yay, I'm finally unbanned, I got the unbanned mail written in spanish but that's what babelfish's for
lol, all my correspondecne with them had been in english before, I wonder what made them chose spanish ![]() *dances all day cuz I have my account back* |
Thomas Valheru
Big_Iron
Originally Posted by Thallandor
anyone has any strong ideas on why exactly we have theses wrongfully banned account all of a sudden?
Maybe it had to do with that Drok monk invasion thread that went on forever....hmm maybe ANet does read these......on second though i have been seening lesser monks zoning to Talus Chute recently......*shivers* scarry isnt it, Big brother is watching...better shut up now. |
Thomas Valheru
Tuoba Hturt Eht
Originally Posted by db0y
I found a connection, the OP posted this on 4/16, the OP at
http://www.guild-hall.net/forum/showthread.php?t=39544 also got banned on 4/16. Something is definately screwy. I'm sure this affected much more people. |
felinette
leprekan
Originally Posted by Thomas Valheru
Yay, I'm finally unbanned, I got the unbanned mail written in spanish but that's what babelfish's for
lol, all my correspondecne with them had been in english before, I wonder what made them chose spanish ![]() *dances all day cuz I have my account back* |
leprekan
Originally Posted by WoodyDotNet
Has anyone detected a pattern? What do the wrongfully banned accounts have in common? Or do they even have anything in common?
|
Stabber
Gaile Gray
leprekan
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
Hi,
You're right, a word or two isn't a bad idea. What I think we've seen happen is a refinement of a process intended to "weed out" the players who are engaged in item sales. This would include not just the actual sellers, but those who farm for them, sometimes on shared accounts working 24/7. As you know, we must control the game economy--that is a benefit for all legitimate players--and we're obliged to do whatever we can to enforce the User Agreement, too. So we work regularly to design practices to enable us to do just that. We recognized there was a glitch in that process, and while it may seem signficant, in the overall percentage of accounts handled, it was really very small. Regardless of numbers, though, when it's your account, it hurts! We are always willing to address issues and re-examine the data to assure that the actions taken are fair and appropriate. As you can see, we have no problem with reversing ourselves if a reinstatement needs to happen. It's a fine line. You want to remove all those who cheat, hack, exploit, abuse, or break the User Agreement, especially those who impact other players directly or even indirectly through damanging the game economy. On the other hand, you want to assure that you don't disrupt the accounts of innocent players. Please forgive us the occasional error that we make, knowing that we'll always be willing to listen, reinvestigate, and reconsider, and will right those errors that are made as quickly as possible. The actions we're taking are incredibly helpful and we're confident that they are necessary, even while we watch for improvements to the process. |
Josh
Originally Posted by coldplay
Grats to you , Ricebox.
I choose the wrong side to believe and I am happy about I was wrong. Now, the question is can we sue A-net when they made false action or we lost the right to sue when we start to receive their service(game play) |
Big_L
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
What I think we've seen happen is a refinement of a process intended to "weed out" the players who are engaged in item sales. This would include not just the actual sellers, but those who farm for them, sometimes on shared accounts working 24/7.
|
Pandora's box
Loviatar
Originally Posted by Pandora's box
Question: Would you accept to make the anti cheat/abuse modules catch less cheaters/abusers if that would guarantee that innocent players are at lower risk to be banned? |
Stockholm
Originally Posted by Pandora's box
From what we read in this thread we can learn at least a few things:
-Banned players hate to get seemingly automatically generated replies. It would be better if they knew in an earlier stage what action will be taken by real persons. -The meganism that determines whether someone abuses an account relies on too many variables of which some are questionable, given the fact that honest players are banned as well. It seems in GW players who have been 'marked' as Ebay traders are not banned right away, but are being followed to catch the ones who trade with them. With the result of honost people getting banned. Correct me on this if I'm wrong. -Its not possible to 100% guarentee innocent players won't be banned. -Arenanet does what it can to find out if players were banned without reason. Question: Would you accept to make the anti cheat/abuse modules catch less cheaters/abusers if that would guarantee that innocent players are at lower risk to be banned? |
jomten
master_ranger_matt
Guardian of the Light
allience
Hell Raiser
Originally Posted by Arena.Net User Agreement
Subject to the terms of this Agreement, NC Interactive grants to you, for your personal use only, a non-exclusive, revocable, nontransferable (except as permitted in Section 4(a)) license to use the Service, and a non-exclusive, nontransferable (except as permitted in Section 4(a)) license to use the Software in connection with the Service, for a duration as defined in Section 5 for so long as you maintain an authorized and fully-paid Account.
|
Originally Posted by Arena.Net User Agreement
NC Interactive reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to (1) delete or alter any Account ID or (2) terminate any license granted herein, for any reason whatsoever, including, without limitation, any suspected or actual infringement of any trademark or trade name right, copyright, or other proprietary right or (3) delete any content published on any electronic boards without notice. You have sole liability for all activities conducted through your Account or under your Account ID.
|
apokolipsuk
Markaedw