Suggestion: Allow Runes to stack in inventory
Tarun
Plain and simple idea. Scrolls now stack in your inventory, so let runes stack in your inventory as well. It would definitely beat having a bunch of runes crowding your storage. I personally buy some runes and save up in case of price changes. Look at prices of Superior Vigors lately, their price is getting to be that of what Superior Absorbtion used to be.
Replicant
/sign don't see why they haven't done this already.
I once had 15 Major Vigors i was holding for guildies, finally decided they took up too much space and sold all to the rune trader.
I once had 15 Major Vigors i was holding for guildies, finally decided they took up too much space and sold all to the rune trader.
shaolin mind trick
I had heard that facitons would introduce a bigger storage, but since that didn't happen, anything to save space is a good idea imo
/signed
/signed
quickmonty
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cjlr
From the title I thought you meant stacking effects...
|
Good thing some of us read before posting
/signed
romO
Hahaha, I had the same reaction as many of the posters above and I was about to ragequit the forums for the day. Luckily enough I actually got around to reading the thread rather than just the name ^^. Anyway, this is a great, logical, and many times, necessary improvement that needs to be implemented. Thanks for bringing it up.
/signed
/signed
dargon
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shaolin mind trick
I had heard that facitons would introduce a bigger storage, but since that didn't happen, anything to save space is a good idea imo
/signed |
TGgold
/signed
Glad I read the thread
I dont see why it should be so hard to set the runes to stack, but my only concern for this would be runes becoming another type of currency.
"WTS Perfect Sword Of Pwnage for 100k+40 Ecto+17 Superior Abs.
Glad I read the thread
I dont see why it should be so hard to set the runes to stack, but my only concern for this would be runes becoming another type of currency.
"WTS Perfect Sword Of Pwnage for 100k+40 Ecto+17 Superior Abs.
Cjlr
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TGgold
... my only concern for this would be runes becoming another type of currency.
"WTS Perfect Sword Of Pwnage for 100k+40 Ecto+17 Superior Abs. |
bilateralrope
One the one hand, I dont see why you should have any more than a few runes of each type at a time, and preventing people hording them seems benificial to everyone else as they can't horde alot of runes if they expect their price to rise.
Then again, storage is limited, and stacking items togeather eases off that pressure. So making something stackable helps there.
So on runes I'm staying netural
Then again, storage is limited, and stacking items togeather eases off that pressure. So making something stackable helps there.
So on runes I'm staying netural
Winterclaw
If runes stack, mods and scrolls should stack too.
quickmonty
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Winterclaw
If runes stack, mods and scrolls should stack too.
|
fiery
I would say Runes don't stack to the due fact of people stocking up on runes to get quick rich. Right now they don't stack cause either, you make the decision.To either get rich or you want invent space.
Tarun
Bump.
Dumbassturtle
/signed
I can see why they wouldn't but if they do I won't complain.
Maybe a new tab on storage that lets you hold one of each type of rune (i.e. one of each atribute type for each class wheter its minor, major or sup is your choice) or a Guild storage? I hold onto runes to outfit my guild its getting a little crazy. ;P
I can see why they wouldn't but if they do I won't complain.
Maybe a new tab on storage that lets you hold one of each type of rune (i.e. one of each atribute type for each class wheter its minor, major or sup is your choice) or a Guild storage? I hold onto runes to outfit my guild its getting a little crazy. ;P
pork soldier
/notsigned, this would allow people to game the supply/demand mechanic by hording extreme numbers of popular (sold out) runes. Remember how hard it was to get a superior dagger rune for the first week of factions, now extrapolate that and imagine that someone can store up to 250 of them per free inventory slot. This btw is the same reason that celestial sigils don't stack.
legion_rat
I dont collect runes unless I have a char in mind that may need them. laziness and storage problems stop that. how bout instead of stacking runes for the sake of people have 250 runes of vigor and because whats the point? we let people pay to increase storage. like the material storage just added, lets be fair and say for 1k you can add 10 spaces to storage. allow up to 3-4 upgrades. I had to mule one of my chars because I have taken to collection greens and storage wont hold them. would gladly pay 1k or maybe more for the extra space.
How bout being able to store full bags in storage? fill a bag (with rune of holding) and then drop it in storage) this could allow all the ~pack rats~ as much space as the could need.
~7}{3 148 R47~
How bout being able to store full bags in storage? fill a bag (with rune of holding) and then drop it in storage) this could allow all the ~pack rats~ as much space as the could need.
~7}{3 148 R47~
Pkest
/not signed
I believe that runes don't stack in inventory because Anet doesn't want speculators to be able to easily control the economy of something so vital and basic to gameplay.
I believe that runes don't stack in inventory because Anet doesn't want speculators to be able to easily control the economy of something so vital and basic to gameplay.
Syklone Xaos
/not signed
Yes, I would personally find it a very useful feature. No, I don't think the benefit to me personally is great enough to outweigh the drastic effect on rune prices stacking them would eventually create.
Yes, I would personally find it a very useful feature. No, I don't think the benefit to me personally is great enough to outweigh the drastic effect on rune prices stacking them would eventually create.
gwjunkie
This doesn't affect me in any way, but if some people have too many runes to stand not stacking them, then it's fine with me.
/signed
/signed
shifting shadows
/sign this requires the use of my [GOOD IDEA] stamp
Antheus
"I'm using Animate Thread Minions"
Stormcloud
/not signed for hording reasons
Saryn
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dumbassturtle
/signed
I can see why they wouldn't but if they do I won't complain. Maybe a new tab on storage that lets you hold one of each type of rune (i.e. one of each atribute type for each class wheter its minor, major or sup is your choice) or a Guild storage? I hold onto runes to outfit my guild its getting a little crazy. ;P |
Good idea, limiting the number of runes one can hold in storage would limit hoarders (grrr to those people
)"Play the game, not the players."
Tarun
I figured this would be most useful for those who farm runes for profit. A lot of times people salvage as they farm and if they can stack it would help save a lot of space.
Shady79
omg are you crazy at all????????
WORST IDEA EVER. Rune prices will EXPLODE. I don't want to pay more than 11k for necro runes.
/NOTSIGNED
WORST IDEA EVER. Rune prices will EXPLODE. I don't want to pay more than 11k for necro runes.
/NOTSIGNED
Loviatar
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
that is exactly why the farmers have zero chance on this one.
MithranArkanere
This could be done only if the stack where something like 10, not the usual 250.
Drelias Melaku
/SIGNED!!!!!
Why haven't they done this yet? ;_;
Why haven't they done this yet? ;_;
Exterminate all
/Signed Yea.. pretty good idea, lessen up the cluster
DarkGanni
Since the new thread for same idea was closed its time to resurrect this one with a nice /signed to it
- Ganni
- Ganni
Witchblade
there is a way to stack runes already, it's called Rune Trader, check your outposts 
greenreaper3
/signed i dont see why not
P.S.
i thought u meant the effects stack.. i mean imange a monk with 4 prot runes :P
P.S.
i thought u meant the effects stack.. i mean imange a monk with 4 prot runes :P
Yawgmoth
I rarely store ~any~ runes in inventory/storage, and having multiples of the same doesn't make sense. Rune Trader is really very useful, I never bother with selling runes to other players, it's just not worth the time. I even don't keep any runes I know I may use in near future, I sell immediately to trader and buy when needed. And who would use multiples of the same rune?
For my hoarding needs the addition of Heroes in Nightfall was more than enough - their armors don't break when salvaging so I had heroes with multiple Sup Vigors on them (and then losing a lot on them dropping from 30k to about 10)
I'd say this feature is not needed for runes and it may only help those who for some shady reason wants to hoard dozens and dozens pieces of the same rune.
One thing much more needed than this - all the Inscriptions to be stackable! There aren't any npc trader for them and some are well worth keeping in multiples, all those 15^50s and other useful ones are pretty common, and there are also those Measure for Measure ones, worth alot when put into certain items but one of them takes a precious inventory slot is just not worth it.
For my hoarding needs the addition of Heroes in Nightfall was more than enough - their armors don't break when salvaging so I had heroes with multiple Sup Vigors on them (and then losing a lot on them dropping from 30k to about 10)
I'd say this feature is not needed for runes and it may only help those who for some shady reason wants to hoard dozens and dozens pieces of the same rune.
One thing much more needed than this - all the Inscriptions to be stackable! There aren't any npc trader for them and some are well worth keeping in multiples, all those 15^50s and other useful ones are pretty common, and there are also those Measure for Measure ones, worth alot when put into certain items but one of them takes a precious inventory slot is just not worth it.
Hyper.nl
/signed to make runes stack. It's the way it always should have been imo.
VinnyRidira
/signed
For those who object because of price hoarding. Please can we have Black and White Dye not stack. lol
For those who object because of price hoarding. Please can we have Black and White Dye not stack. lol
Xue Fang
I realize the age of the age of this thread, but this 2.75 year old problem still needs consideration.
HawkofStorms
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xue Fang
I realize the age of the age of this thread, but this 2.75 year old problem still needs consideration.
|
Xue Fang
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
No it doesn't. The arguements against it are still valid. Doing this will allow for people to intentionally hoard runes and control market prices.
|
p.s. People hoard Ectos and Armbraces, and the value has found a constant.
MithranArkanere
The problem to stack runes is that they are upgrades.
And so, they can be identified and have their own Value attribute.
You can stack only things with fixed Values attributes (1gold for dyes, 100g for Ecto).
On top of that, unlike dyes and rare materials, runes are something that everyone need to be as effective as the rest of players.
So it's better is the less used cost just 100g and people can't hoard too much Superior Vigor runes to use them as currency.
They drop much less than ectos.
And so, they can be identified and have their own Value attribute.
You can stack only things with fixed Values attributes (1gold for dyes, 100g for Ecto).
On top of that, unlike dyes and rare materials, runes are something that everyone need to be as effective as the rest of players.
So it's better is the less used cost just 100g and people can't hoard too much Superior Vigor runes to use them as currency.
They drop much less than ectos.
Biostem
Here's what I would suggest: just like we have crafting material storage in our Xunlai chest, also add a page for armor & armor-related items, (runes, insignias, & armor itself). Keep the non-stacking aspect of runes, but giving that 1 extra page would add some rune storage if you want it, and also satisfy the need of people who want to store several suits of armor as well.