Complain or learn to counter?
Lykan
A well placed Diversion will halve a touch rangers damage output, if you get a second one on as well all they can do is run.
Spiteful spirit will sort em out too as most wil be spamming and not watching their status bar.
Spiteful spirit will sort em out too as most wil be spamming and not watching their status bar.
zulu123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lykan
A well placed Diversion will halve a touch rangers damage output, if you get a second one on as well all they can do is run.
Spiteful spirit will sort em out too as most wil be spamming and not watching their status bar. |
Here are skills that are anti-warrior but dont work against touch rangers:
Empathy,
Insidious Parasite,
Enfeeble,
Throw Dirt,
Blinding Flash ,
Ward against melee,
Kinetic armor,
reckless haste,
price of failure,
spirit of failure,
Protective Spirit,
Shield Guardian
Being a 'noob' that cannot learn to counter I am sure I have missed tons of other anti-warrior skills that dont work against touch rangers. Even then, please at least give me 12 skills that are purely anti-touch ranger.
S!carius
^^ your post is quite off topic. (mine is too, sorry)
Anyway, why do you need 12 skills that are anti-touch ranger? Why not just have a necro throw on SS (anti-warrior and anti touch all in one skill). Also, take a snare, most groups will have a snare with them (again, anti-warrior and anti-touch ranger). You only need a skill or two, that most people will bring anyways, to counter them.
Anyway, why do you need 12 skills that are anti-touch ranger? Why not just have a necro throw on SS (anti-warrior and anti touch all in one skill). Also, take a snare, most groups will have a snare with them (again, anti-warrior and anti-touch ranger). You only need a skill or two, that most people will bring anyways, to counter them.
zulu123
Quote:
Originally Posted by S!carius
^^ your post is quite off topic. (mine is too, sorry)
Anyway, why do you need 12 skills that are anti-touch ranger? Why not just have a necro throw on SS (anti-warrior and anti touch all in one skill). Also, take a snare, most groups will have a snare with them (again, anti-warrior and anti-touch ranger). You only need a skill or two, that most people will bring anyways, to counter them. |
Dravyn
Quote:
Learn to play is no defense whatsoever when the build you're playing against can only be properly countered in a way that would reduce your effectiveness against any other build. For people who feel like this is a valid argument, give examples of successful ways to deal with a build like touch rangers that are generally available across the board, or stfu (I'm sorry to be so blunt, but I'm getting tired of this psuedo-elitist 'you should counter me' attitude). Generally a good build will have interrupts, snares, damage reduction and hex/enchantment/condition removal. A good player in all circumstances, except against a touch ranger or similarly out of control build, will be able to apply a skill bar so designed to deal with a balanced build. An occassional blind spot is understandable. Touch rangers (to my knowledge the only build like it) ARE the blind spot. Touch rangers are countered well by one class (mesmers), and GOOD touch rangers are not so easily destroyed by e-denial and snares. (I made a touch ranger that laughed at snare builds, then killed them because I could). In my opinion, a build is out of balance when the meta-game must adapt to deal with that build even though, were it not for that build, such adaptions would otherwise be broadly undesirable, considering every other build extant. For example, warrior hate is a broad strategic area that should include strategy applied by (nearly) every class and build. There is almost no cross-class, cross build hate for touch skills and stances (nor do I think there should be, as this is the appeal of skills and stances). The problem isn't so much touch rangers as an idea, however, as it is the ability of the class to accomplish goals that every other build wishes it could achieve but doesn't, because they have been balanced to prevent such accomplishments. |
lyra_song
Quote:
Originally Posted by shardfenix
Psychic Distraction Mesmers. Why is it broken? Because it can't be stopped. Mantra of resolve and glyph of concentration do not affect PD.
|
Its a powerful skill with a HUGE cost, so i think its balanced.
Kriel Drache
All most uber builds need to be countered is one skill. I shut down Touch Rangers on a regular basis with just one spell. However, my current build of choice is also very weak against certain builds. There is a counter for every skill. It just takes some thinking to find it.
MSecorsky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mai
Moving, Snaring, Learning to play, etc etc
All of the above can easily kill a touch ranger since one has to "touch" you to do any damage. |
Binding Chains.
Go kill someone else and leave them stuck there.
Navaros
Only people who are not good at the game call people who beat them newbies or insult their build.
Over the history of Guild Wars Anet has always way over-nerfed things that did not need nerfing at all. Ie: smiting, IWAY.
This makes the game less fun because any common build that does not completely suck will cause mass hysteria amongst bad players who make illegitimate complaints about it until Anet caves to them and nerfs it.
That trend leaves people with even less quick-party builds to choose from, and just makes Guild Wars PVP even more uninteresting because every time Anet nerfs the latest common build that bad players complain about, everyone will just migrate to the newer one until Anet unjustly nerfs that too. Then the cycle continues, resulting in one single build dominating PVP as a direct result of Anet's unnecessary nerfing. Whereas if they stopped nerfing things due to mass hysteria of bad players, there would be many common quick-party builds to choose from by now and much more variety and fun in PVP.
Touch rangers do not need nerfing. A time for the end to the nerfing madness must come. That time is now.
Over the history of Guild Wars Anet has always way over-nerfed things that did not need nerfing at all. Ie: smiting, IWAY.
This makes the game less fun because any common build that does not completely suck will cause mass hysteria amongst bad players who make illegitimate complaints about it until Anet caves to them and nerfs it.
That trend leaves people with even less quick-party builds to choose from, and just makes Guild Wars PVP even more uninteresting because every time Anet nerfs the latest common build that bad players complain about, everyone will just migrate to the newer one until Anet unjustly nerfs that too. Then the cycle continues, resulting in one single build dominating PVP as a direct result of Anet's unnecessary nerfing. Whereas if they stopped nerfing things due to mass hysteria of bad players, there would be many common quick-party builds to choose from by now and much more variety and fun in PVP.
Touch rangers do not need nerfing. A time for the end to the nerfing madness must come. That time is now.
Symbol
Quote:
Knew that would come up, my bad for not limiting the focus of that statement. A good touch ranger is difficult, if not impossible, to kite. Kite me and I will use Escape to rush hit you, back off when you least expect, and run over to your monk (or appropriate priority soft target) who's position I've been keeping track of on the map (if playing a touch ranger). |
Quote:
Kiting works well on an assassin (limited chase mechanisms, need to combo), but a touch ranger has enough tricks to mitigate kiting concerns. |
Quote:
Note also that Crippled is a condition, that is transferrable by PT, so that's not happening (In my Touch Ranger experience I once went up against a monk, a ranger, a warrior and an elementalist. The ranger and warrior smacked me with multiple conditions (crippled, blind, deep wound, bleeding), hoping to kill me early ... I just dropped those conditions off on their monk, and proceeded to suck him dry.) |
Sanji
There's a fine line between covering all bases with legitimate reasons why a build is broken and going "It's broken because I can't beat it."
While there ARE legitimate uses of "it's fine, learn to play" of course there are some people who say that when they actually mean "It's not broken because I play this build."
While there ARE legitimate uses of "it's fine, learn to play" of course there are some people who say that when they actually mean "It's not broken because I play this build."
Gargle Blaster
i just wish people could have a real discussion about skill balancing. for example the thread on touch rangers... it seems to have turned into a bitch fest over the fact that people dont like nerfs... i notice none of the facts about touch rangers ever came up(yea i know i started it... i am almost regretting it now)... like what is the DPS of a touch ranger? how does that compare to the dps of degen? what are the standards to determin how one skill balances another? there are alot of real issues we could be talking about --but yall like to complain about complainig too much.
Eviance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorian Direspell
Eviance, I was hardly angry at you. Generally, I agree with your posts.
|
However I think if every class worked at it they could find a counter. I mean look at IWAY, there are still so many people shouting this exact same argument, it's broke, over powered, should be fixed and so forth..... But while all this might be true and not every team or person can over come an IWAY - it IS possible and that was my only point, that if these people who complain so much work at it they can find a way to beat it. The problem with randoms is that it is random and teams are often thrown together with a monk and damage. I am sure tho that a really good practiced guild team could come up with some way. Ya can't counter everything all the time and this is the biggest issue in all areas, but that is part of the game. You are never going to find anything that can counter across the board.... and if you do.... PM ME Cause I have indeed looked into this and our guild came up with a viable way to deal with most in HoH but we still have issues with ranger spike -_-
But it seems that more knowledgable people have come into the debate so I will indeed step out *bows* Thanks for the pleasant response and I hope you don't think I was flaming you, I just always seem to come across like that (Honestly it's a habbit -_-)
Lykan
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulu123
There we go... more skills that are anti-warrior too. Can anyone make a list of skills that are anti-touch ranger and NOT anti-warrior?
Here are skills that are anti-warrior but dont work against touch rangers: Empathy, Insidious Parasite, Enfeeble, Throw Dirt, Blinding Flash , Ward against melee, Kinetic armor, reckless haste, price of failure, spirit of failure, Protective Spirit, Shield Guardian Being a 'noob' that cannot learn to counter I am sure I have missed tons of other anti-warrior skills that dont work against touch rangers. Even then, please at least give me 12 skills that are purely anti-touch ranger. |
There are no anti-touch ranger skills because a touch ranger is not a class it is a build, to counter a build you look for the weaknesses in it.
You list skills that are anti-warrior but dont work against touch rangers? Why on earth should they? A touch ranger is nothing like a warrior. Every skill you have listed is a counter to a melee attack, touch rangers are not melee.
To counter you have to stop them touching you. Kite or shut down their skills.
Zorian Direspell
Quote:
So your solution to kiting is switching targets and/or a speedboost? How is this unique to touch rangers? Kiting is effective whether you're up against a warrior or a touch ranger. |
Quote:
You have exactly one trick, a speedboost. That's it. Touchers aren't any harder to kite than any other melee range class. |
Quote:
Anyone who isn't retarded isn't going to stick around once they've crippled you... |
Kiting warriors is more effective because they lose adrenaline while they are being kited. Touch rangers gain energy. Touch rangers actually benefit from having enemies run away (because if you're running, you're doing nada and the TR is gaining energy, while flipping through a list of potential targets).
jummeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tijger
A lot of if's there. Now lets go back to the starting point, what damage does a plain sword hit do in PvP to a warrior wearing AL 90 armor? I'm willing to bet its 0 more then a lv 24 creature does in PvE.
|
An intellegent player knows when to hit you with their adreno spike, so the effect is often more deadly. Eg. KD hit hit KD hit hit. An AI boss might get lucky, but it is done by design in PvP.
Edenial quite happily neuters touchers, they are rangers so have lower e-regen anyway, so you can plop surge, burn and weariness and slap ether lord, they are bottomed out and will stay bottomed, if thats not enough, blackout and boom they are useless.
If its a team, then you pick them off one by one, its tricky but it can be countered by normal balanced teams reasonably. The mesmer in question is a shutdown anti monk mesmer, so its not a special build either.
zulu123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lykan
You think Diversion and Spiteful are purely anti warrior? Diversion is anti caster if anything and Spiteful works on every class going.
There are no anti-touch ranger skills because a touch ranger is not a class it is a build, to counter a build you look for the weaknesses in it. You list skills that are anti-warrior but dont work against touch rangers? Why on earth should they? A touch ranger is nothing like a warrior. Every skill you have listed is a counter to a melee attack, touch rangers are not melee. To counter you have to stop them touching you. Kite or shut down their skills. |
Please tell me how kiting or shutting down or degen is any different from using them against warriors? I listed anti-warrior skills to show how many counters exist against a them. The point was there are too many counter skills for warrior builds where as you or anyone has not been able to show me even 1 pure anti-touch ranger skill.
Every anti-warrior skill gives me a weakness in warriors. A simple excercise can prove that touch rangers are unbalanced. Simply list all skills that are anti-warrior. Then list skills that are anti-touch ranger. You will see for yourself how unbalanced those lists are.
Chicken Ftw
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorian Direspell
Escape has evasion. Evasion may not be unique to touch rangers, but it is unique to rangers. The evasion rate is 75%. For the most part, you shouldn't get hit with any crippling attacks. When you are, escape takes you back up 25%, so you may catch the crippler, or, more likely, you'll catch one of their team mates who didn't watch you get crippled. If it's rare that a good crippler sticks around to admire the job, it's rarer still that a good player gets kited away from the rest of the action.
Kiting warriors is more effective because they lose adrenaline while they are being kited. Touch rangers gain energy. Touch rangers actually benefit from having enemies run away (because if you're running, you're doing nada and the TR is gaining energy, while flipping through a list of potential targets). |
This "touch rangers benefit from kiting" is really quite stupid. They benefit from getting less touches off on people, and gaining less health/dealing less damage? Don't think so. Besides, OoB is for energy management, relying on kiting to regain energy is...dumb. Oh, and this "kiting shuts down the person running" statement works both ways... they've shut you down too.
Lykan
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulu123
The point was there are too many counter skills for warrior builds where as you or anyone has not been able to show me even 1 pure anti-touch ranger skill.
|
Anet didnt think about touch rangers and stick in a secret special skill just to counter them which will turn them into whimpering kittens.
To beat them you have to use what is available to you.
Gargle Blaster
Quote:
Originally Posted by jummeth
An axe can crit at around 80 on a 100AL. I don't understand your point. Bosses in PvE have double damage because they are dumb, and need to be buffed.
An intellegent player knows when to hit you with their adreno spike, so the effect is often more deadly. Eg. KD hit hit KD hit hit. An AI boss might get lucky, but it is done by design in PvP. Edenial quite happily neuters touchers, they are rangers so have lower e-regen anyway, so you can plop surge, burn and weariness and slap ether lord, they are bottomed out and will stay bottomed, if thats not enough, blackout and boom they are useless. If its a team, then you pick them off one by one, its tricky but it can be countered by normal balanced teams reasonably. The mesmer in question is a shutdown anti monk mesmer, so its not a special build either. |
zulu123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lykan
Warriors are a character class which is why there are skills which can be called anti-warrior and as I said there are no skills which are specifically anti-touch ranger because they are not a class they are a build. The question your asking is like asking why are there no skills specifically made to work against blood spike or earth ele's or boon prots.
Anet didnt think about touch rangers and stick in a secret special skill just to counter them which will turn them into whimpering kittens. To beat them you have to use what is available to you. |
And no, the question I am asking is nothing like your example. I wish I PvPed a little more to answer that in depth. But suffice to say there are tons of skills that can counter a blood spike, earth ele or boon prot.
Ghull Ka
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lykan
a secret special skill just to counter them which will turn them into whimpering kittens.
|
"I'm using Whimpering Kitten on X!"
*poof*
"Meow??"
Zorian Direspell
Quote:
Cripshot cannot be blocked/evaded. Semi-spammable. Gg? Besides, good touch rangers don't use escape, they use OoB. Energy is touches, which = life. Mesmer/ele snares, no evading those either. This "touch rangers benefit from kiting" is really quite stupid. They benefit from getting less touches off on people, and gaining less health/dealing less damage? Don't think so. Besides, OoB is for energy management, relying on kiting to regain energy is...dumb. Oh, and this "kiting shuts down the person running" statement works both ways... they've shut you down too. |
Good touch rangers don't use OoB*. Having lots and lots of energy in lieu of damage mitigation for a damage spike class is just a bad idea. Without OoB you can still toss off 7-8 bursts of 65 damage, with intermittant wanding regaining you energy (because you're not using it) and finishing fleeing targets. If you can't kill someone with that, your team must not be clicking together very well at all. Tossing OoB should generally save you 75% of the damage you would take from warriors, rangers, and, most of all, assassins (where you may save even more than that by shutting down combos). The resultant gain in endurance makes the touch attacks even more effective as self heals, and saves your team as a whole lots of energy that otherwise would have been spent protecting you. You won't touch as often, but your touches will be better timed and more ably applied. (and in any other conversation, that line would sound horribly inappropriate. :P)
I never said that they benefit from touching people less. I said that they benefit from you running from them, letting them recover. If you're running, they're at least shutting you down until they can gather enough strength to perform a feat that may very well destroy a member of your team, and will leave them in great shape following it. What are you gaining from running that compares to what they will do when they're fully recovered (assuming you're not a toucher yourself)?** Simple logic suggests that if your recovery doesn't result in at least as impressive a gain to you as it does to them, you're losing the 'attrition war' that is inherant in kiting.
* At least from my experience, OoBers*** tend to drop properly (usually from assasins after one of their more limited stances ends) while escapers (and I wasn't the only one) tend to hold up longer, and know how to engage in psychological warfare well enough to lull others into thinking their energy has been depleted.
** I should note that an Escape using build will fall to an OoB using build 1v1 (from what I've seen of it). This only makes sense of course, as both have armor/evasion/blocking ignoring attacks, but one has a greater pool to draw from. However, having another variant of a build as a limitation on that build hardly seems suggestive of either balance or build superiority.
VGJustice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorian Direspell
Crip Shot = Elite. That's also only one profession, with a specific build probably for anti-touch tactics. That goes to the heart of the problem right there, the over-specialization borne by touch rangers. And that still doesn't solve speed boost + plague touch concerns provided you're near some other enemy.
|
Heh, kinda like the touch rangers. :P
Symbol
Quote:
Escape has evasion. Evasion may not be unique to touch rangers, but it is unique to rangers. The evasion rate is 75%. For the most part, you shouldn't get hit with any crippling attacks. When you are, escape takes you back up 25%, so you may catch the crippler, or, more likely, you'll catch one of their team mates who didn't watch you get crippled. If it's rare that a good crippler sticks around to admire the job, it's rarer still that a good player gets kited away from the rest of the action. |
Quote:
Kiting warriors is more effective because they lose adrenaline while they are being kited. Touch rangers gain energy. Touch rangers actually benefit from having enemies run away (because if you're running, you're doing nada and the TR is gaining energy, while flipping through a list of potential targets). |
Tijger
After reading all the blurb here how overpowered touch rangers are I decided to spend a couple of hours in RA to see what its all about.
I encountered 6 touch rangers and (I'm playing W/N) purposely sought them out and went one on one with them, of those 6 only 1 managed to inflict serious enough damage to me that I ran from him. The other 5 I killed without too much difficulty.
Having said that, the amount of atrociously bad players, and especially warriors, in RA is astounding, out of 8 teams I was in only *1* that was able to get 10+ wins, if the monk hadnt left we'd have gone on to a lot more I suspect.
I encountered not a single warrior who had Hamstring, most of them were Wammo's with the occasional W/E, and none of them had any way to deal with conditions.
Before anyone calls me elitist or experienced, I earned my first Gladiator title point today, I have *1* fame, I consider myself a total noob in PvP.
I'm sorry but if touch rangers are nerfed because of the complaining done by these people it will be a seriously sad day for GW. There is nothing amazingly good or overpowering about them.
I encountered 6 touch rangers and (I'm playing W/N) purposely sought them out and went one on one with them, of those 6 only 1 managed to inflict serious enough damage to me that I ran from him. The other 5 I killed without too much difficulty.
Having said that, the amount of atrociously bad players, and especially warriors, in RA is astounding, out of 8 teams I was in only *1* that was able to get 10+ wins, if the monk hadnt left we'd have gone on to a lot more I suspect.
I encountered not a single warrior who had Hamstring, most of them were Wammo's with the occasional W/E, and none of them had any way to deal with conditions.
Before anyone calls me elitist or experienced, I earned my first Gladiator title point today, I have *1* fame, I consider myself a total noob in PvP.
I'm sorry but if touch rangers are nerfed because of the complaining done by these people it will be a seriously sad day for GW. There is nothing amazingly good or overpowering about them.
Zorian Direspell
Last post and I'm calling it a day:
Fair enough. Wouldn't say that touch rangers of today are the same as yesterday though.
Crip dagger has 'if it hits' in its description. I'd assume its subject to evade. Haven't used it though, so I have no idea. Caltrops is a ten energy hex for an assassin that doesn't contribute to your damage payload, or any strategy in general as assassins have better ways to kite. Return is one of the least efficient ways to teleport, which makes its utility limited. This is the problem I'm seeing. R/N dual touchers are paragons of efficiency (damage and heal, remove and cause conditions, evade and increase speed, evade and damage, nothing but hexes stick.) Answers to R/N touchers are not as efficient (cripple, and that's it, snare and maybe a little (very little if water hex v. ranger) damage, and so on. (Mesmer hexes, particularly degen, are effiicient, however, because they can be used as part of an overall effective plan.)
1. The point isn't so much that a warrior must run out of adrenaline every time he gets kited as that a warrior not hitting is a resource waste while a touch ranger not hitting is resource gathering.
2. A sword attack has a 0.17 shorter delay than a vamp touch. Fine. A sword attack doesn't heal you.
3. Physical attacks of all kinds are still subject to a healthy stable of counters. The same is true of spell/hex counters, etc. The same is not true of touch attacks and stances. TRs use touch attacks and stances while other builds do not to accomplish the same thing.
4. I'm done arguing the point for now. I see both sides fairly well entrenched. Besides, the OP didn't even care about touch rangers (or so he said) :P. The issue was balance. My belief remains that a build isn't balanced if it suffers less hate than its competitor builds by nature of the game's design. As has been mentioned by previous posters, when anything that works against a particular build also works against all other builds designed for the same purpose, but the superset of skills that work against all the other builds do not work for that build, that build is superior to all other builds for the same purpose. In a game that is designed to encourage competition in that niche, superiority = imbalance. When someone suspects that such a situation has occurred, they should be able to engage in a conversation about it without resorting to veiled insults and petty witicisms. This is called 'constructive criticism'. Whining, whether for or against something, requires the extra element of pre-emptive personal attacks and the denigration of others. (I'll admit it before someone brings it up ... I began posting on this thread to whine about the whiners who were whining about whining ... proof, I suppose, that whining begets more of itself rather quickly).
Quote:
Wait, what? Cripshot Rangers have been around for a while, and they're anti preasure, anti kiter. Now they have slightly expanded use. That's not over specializing, that's just using what's already there. Heh, kinda like the touch rangers. :P |
Quote:
Cripshot, caltrops, crippling dagger, return, |
Quote:
You've got to be kidding me. Do you have any idea how long it takes for you to lose your adrenaline charge? A damn sight longer than it takes to catch up and strike a kiting target, that's for sure. Warriors also benefit from autocrits and the fact that their attacks leave them standing for less time than a toucher (1.33 secs for axe/sword, vs 1.5 for a vamp touch counting aftercast). If anything warriors are superior in the face of kiting. |
2. A sword attack has a 0.17 shorter delay than a vamp touch. Fine. A sword attack doesn't heal you.
3. Physical attacks of all kinds are still subject to a healthy stable of counters. The same is true of spell/hex counters, etc. The same is not true of touch attacks and stances. TRs use touch attacks and stances while other builds do not to accomplish the same thing.
4. I'm done arguing the point for now. I see both sides fairly well entrenched. Besides, the OP didn't even care about touch rangers (or so he said) :P. The issue was balance. My belief remains that a build isn't balanced if it suffers less hate than its competitor builds by nature of the game's design. As has been mentioned by previous posters, when anything that works against a particular build also works against all other builds designed for the same purpose, but the superset of skills that work against all the other builds do not work for that build, that build is superior to all other builds for the same purpose. In a game that is designed to encourage competition in that niche, superiority = imbalance. When someone suspects that such a situation has occurred, they should be able to engage in a conversation about it without resorting to veiled insults and petty witicisms. This is called 'constructive criticism'. Whining, whether for or against something, requires the extra element of pre-emptive personal attacks and the denigration of others. (I'll admit it before someone brings it up ... I began posting on this thread to whine about the whiners who were whining about whining ... proof, I suppose, that whining begets more of itself rather quickly).
Dahl
Just because you can't figure out the touch ranger weakness, doesn't mean it needs to be nerfed, it means you need to use your brain.
The ONLY build i feel needs to be nerfed (again) is iway. Not because of the power or lack of skill to use, but because it's near impossible to find a PUG in HA if you don't play iway.
I personally will not play iway, its degrading and an embarrassment, but at the same time that's all anyone ever plays there, so unless I'm in a guild that plays HA often, there's no way to even enter halls. And people wonder why I hardly have any rank, making it that much harder to get INTO good guilds. Thank god for my immense gvg experience or I would be toast.
The ONLY build i feel needs to be nerfed (again) is iway. Not because of the power or lack of skill to use, but because it's near impossible to find a PUG in HA if you don't play iway.
I personally will not play iway, its degrading and an embarrassment, but at the same time that's all anyone ever plays there, so unless I'm in a guild that plays HA often, there's no way to even enter halls. And people wonder why I hardly have any rank, making it that much harder to get INTO good guilds. Thank god for my immense gvg experience or I would be toast.
eternal pho
by far the cheapest build in RA/TA/AB ^^
Chicken Ftw
I give up on debating about whether or not anything needs nerfing. No matter how many counters exist, people refuse to use them, and just say the build needs nerfing. Fine, whatever. Nerf it all to hell, for all I care. I'll just play another game, because this one is infested with subpar players who somehow always get their way. ;p
Zui
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Ftw
I give up on debating about whether or not anything needs nerfing. No matter how many counters exist, people refuse to use them, and just say the build needs nerfing. Fine, whatever. Nerf it all to hell, for all I care. I'll just play another game, because this one is infested with subpar players who somehow always get their way. ;p
|
ANET should add a skill that counters only life stealing skills with a touch description, and make it about as playable as Keystone Signet and Otugyhs Cry are. This way all the scrubs who complain there are "less counters" can get a specific counter that's totaly unsuitable for PvP play and be happy. Even though the counters to warriors and such are a class counter, not a build counter... This skill could be named "z0mg wtf I'm a total scrub anet couldn't nerf my scrubness, so they gave me this skill instead."
Ensign
Quote:
Originally Posted by shardfenix
What is the counter to touch rangers?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shardfenix
Apostasy iway...The counter?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shardfenix
Either run through trap bombs and 8 melee damage dealers to kill the necro, or stack literally 10 enchantments on each member of your party.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shardfenix
Psychic Distraction Mesmers. Why is it broken? Because it can't be stopped.
|
Psychic Distraction guys are annoying, not good. Remember playing against those dumb mesmers in arena with 6 interrupts and Wastrel's Worry or the like? Did you think they were any good? A typical Distraction guy isn't any better. After hit interrupts a skill you get a freebie with a cast time of two seconds or less that he can't even touch. Distraction costs 10, and he can't use emanagement to power it unless you let him. It is the most predictable template around because you know exactly what he has available after an interrupt. He's one trick. If you can't outthink one trick you have problems.
Distraction is a good skill against ritualists, water/fire elementalists, and death necromancers - it's a poor skill against virtually every other template. If for whatever reason he is annoying you can blast him with warriors to force a skill through. The main use of the skill is to interrupt Ghostly Heroes, for obvious reasons - everywhere else, it's a goofy template that a team's trying to ferry into the hall.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shardfenix
The point of all this is to show you that people complain because if they don't
|
That's not to say that defensive measures are bad. It's just that your defense needs to be used to feed your offense. You cannot be using Ward Against Melee to create a bubble to hide in, for instance - you need to be pushing the Ward into the other team's face, setting up a defended spot from which to hit him even harder. The point of defense is to keep your offense alive long enough to beat the other team. Always keep that in mind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulu123
Touch rangers are not unbeatable but they have way FEWER counters than warriors.
|
The big issue with a touch ranger in arena isn't that he's hard to counter, as much as his effectiveness is dictated more by the build than the player. That level of effectiveness is much, much higher than what a typical warrior in random arena will dish out. A touch ranger is going to Vamp Touch for 65 and Touch of Agony for 50. The warriors you find might not have even specced their weapon attribute.
Peace,
-CxE
Dravyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Ftw
I give up on debating about whether or not anything needs nerfing. No matter how many counters exist, people refuse to use them, and just say the build needs nerfing. Fine, whatever. Nerf it all to hell, for all I care. I'll just play another game, because this one is infested with subpar players who somehow always get their way. ;p
|
Tijger, I'd like some insight on how you withstood 65 dmg spam while doing enough dmg to outdo 65 dmg heals linked to the 65 dmg spam being done to you. Either you did nothing but kite the touchers with your W/N, or you spent all day knocking him down while someone else killed it. I too figured out a way to kill Touch Rangers with a W/N and it involved Virulence and I had a ton of fun doing it, but most of the time I was either dead or very near it by the time they dropped.
Chicken Ftw
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dravyn
Sounds like a touch ranger to me.
|
Numa Pompilius
I have no opinion on Touch Rangers, but just want to point one thing out: that there are counters to something has no bearing at all to whether that something is overpowered or not.
Consider: let's say Wastrels Worry did 600 points AoE damage over a wide area, but the delay before it 'triggers' was 10 seconds. If you were the target of WW, you would just have to use any skill within 10 seconds, but if you failed to do so it'd likely wipe the whole team. It's pretty obious this hypothetical neutron-bomb WW would be overpowered and in need of a nerf, even though it'd be easy to counter.
Consider: let's say Wastrels Worry did 600 points AoE damage over a wide area, but the delay before it 'triggers' was 10 seconds. If you were the target of WW, you would just have to use any skill within 10 seconds, but if you failed to do so it'd likely wipe the whole team. It's pretty obious this hypothetical neutron-bomb WW would be overpowered and in need of a nerf, even though it'd be easy to counter.
Numa Pompilius
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gargle Blaster
the problem with a shutdown mesmer is that they are only a support char... they will not be able to kill a touch ranger alone...
|
The thing with being a mesmer in RA is that they're fragile, get targeted first (or second, if there happen to be a monk around), and get zero support.
Another problem is that hexes are if not useless so at least not as powerful as they used to be before Factions, because there are so many new & cheap ways of removing hexes, and mesmers don't have many unconditional direct damage spells.
Mai
These threads continue to leave my speechless. Just wow is all I have to say. Touch rangers can not kill you in one hit, nor can they solo a million people and they are definetly not the boogeyman soooo many players portray them as to be. Reasons people die to Touch Rangers usually goes into one of the following reasons:
A.) Lack of snares
B.) Player has no clue how to kite
C.) Player has no idea how to play and wants to be hand fed on how to play this game.
D.) Player just sucks. Period
I'm really sick and tired of seeing nerf threads in general due to lack of players being able to think of a counter on their own. Touch Rangers are in my opinion far from overpowered due to the fact that they are easy to counter as long as you continue kiting and your team has some general idea of how to PvP in general.
A.) Lack of snares
B.) Player has no clue how to kite
C.) Player has no idea how to play and wants to be hand fed on how to play this game.
D.) Player just sucks. Period
I'm really sick and tired of seeing nerf threads in general due to lack of players being able to think of a counter on their own. Touch Rangers are in my opinion far from overpowered due to the fact that they are easy to counter as long as you continue kiting and your team has some general idea of how to PvP in general.
Symbol
Quote:
Crip dagger has 'if it hits' in its description. I'd assume its subject to evade. Haven't used it though, so I have no idea. Caltrops is a ten energy hex for an assassin that doesn't contribute to your damage payload, or any strategy in general as assassins have better ways to kite. |
Quote:
Return is one of the least efficient ways to teleport, which makes its utility limited. |
Quote:
This is the problem I'm seeing. R/N dual touchers are paragons of efficiency (damage and heal, remove and cause conditions, evade and increase speed, evade and damage, nothing but hexes stick.) Answers to R/N touchers are not as efficient (cripple, and that's it, snare and maybe a little (very little if water hex v. ranger) damage, and so on. (Mesmer hexes, particularly degen, are effiicient, however, because they can be used as part of an overall effective plan.) |
* No endurance. With OOB you have around 30 seconds of touching before you run dry (at least with the dual vamp touch variant). Without it you have much much less.
* No spike
* A self heal that relies upon you being in melee range
* Severely vulnerable to disruption (diversion in particular).
People can and do exploit all of them, it's just that they don't want to because they've been carrying mass melee hate for so long (in the arenas at least) and don't want to change.
Quote:
1. The point isn't so much that a warrior must run out of adrenaline every time he gets kited as that a warrior not hitting is a resource waste while a touch ranger not hitting is resource gathering. |
shardfenix
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
Snares and energy debilitation. Touch of Agony isn't scary and they aren't going to keep it up, and Vampiric Touch every 5 seconds is largely irrelevant. They don't have any sort of disruption and can't spike.
|
Against rangers they have dodge (touch skills are not attacks), and against casters, they have elemental defense on their armor and with skills. The only effective way to beat a touch ranger group is with blood spikers (or as I said, snares) Caster spikes would also destroy them, but I'm not arguing that it's unbeatable, I'm arguing that it's broken, which it is. They have all the advantages of necro spikers, plus armor/evade bonuses. Their only drawback is that they have small range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
See, there's your problem with facing iWay. You're attempting the two worst strategies possible against it. Chasing their necros is a waste of time, one of those guy's jobs is to mitigate damage by running away, and it's always a good trade for them to make. Similarly falling into defensive mode is a recipe for disaster, they have eight guys dedicated to offense and that will eventually break all but the most extreme of defenses. Against iWay you're on a short clock to kill a team with minimal defenses. You'd better learn to race. If you're wasting time on things that don't matter instead of racing it's no wonder that you're losing.
|
4 warriors + 4 pets on a ghost with a portable well of profane = gg. those 8 warriors and pets probably do close to 400 damage per second WITHOUT speed boosts, which is just rediculous. You need a team of 6 monks to stop that much damage without the use of bonds/seeds/other damage reduction skills.
Not to mention order of apostasy has mapwide range. since there is no way to kill the apoc necro, the only way to beat it is by killing 2 trappers (which is easy) and 4 warriors, half of which usually have sentinel armor. And you have to do this while your casters are kiting their butts off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
An interrupt that can't be stopped by Mantra of Resolve is broken? Power Block has a nice history of being used to shut people down through a Mantra, and blacking them out on top of it. But why does that break a skill when very few people run Mantra of Resolve or Concentration in the first place? Mantras aren't the counter to interrupters. Never have been. The counter to an interrupter is a warrior. If he's getting blasted he can't interrupt.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
]Psychic Distraction guys are annoying, not good. Remember playing against those dumb mesmers in arena with 6 interrupts and Wastrel's Worry or the like? Did you think they were any good? A typical Distraction guy isn't any better. After hit interrupts a skill you get a freebie with a cast time of two seconds or less that he can't even touch. Distraction costs 10, and he can't use emanagement to power it unless you let him. It is the most predictable template around because you know exactly what he has available after an interrupt. He's one trick. If you can't outthink one trick you have problems.
|
JR
Do we really need another thread about Touch Rangers?