From another website, there is a suggested "possible" duping exploit which involves zoning and logging out/in (and something else which isn't considered as normal gameplay) with another person. I think the OP is testing it. Lucky for him he was only hit with 1-week ban. Anet should permenantly ban all hacking offenders.
Here's Something NOT All Players Will Know
4 pages • Page 4
T
The ArenaNet staff aren't the narrow-minded idiots some people are describing as far as Banning goes, for these reasons:
1. They check the logs, get reports of scammers, and notice exactly what you type to other players and such.
2. They don't just ban people because of a lot of logins. Sounds to me like you were duping a bunch of noobs into giving you items or somehing, and then quickly switching your char name in hopes of fooling ArenaNet with different names... but of course im only guessing, and you would never admit to it.
3. Don't you think they have better things to do then listen to your lame ass emails about unfair banning when they only ban a handful of players a week which are the biggest abusers of the system and such.
4. They want your money, and they know that doing things such as unlawful bannings would entice you to not buy the expansion
.
You say unlawful banning, and I say sit down, shut up, and wait the week; It's not gonna kill you. Although it will postpone your trips to the new areas.
oh damn Gaile already responded, guess I didn't have to say nething.
1. They check the logs, get reports of scammers, and notice exactly what you type to other players and such.
2. They don't just ban people because of a lot of logins. Sounds to me like you were duping a bunch of noobs into giving you items or somehing, and then quickly switching your char name in hopes of fooling ArenaNet with different names... but of course im only guessing, and you would never admit to it.
3. Don't you think they have better things to do then listen to your lame ass emails about unfair banning when they only ban a handful of players a week which are the biggest abusers of the system and such.
4. They want your money, and they know that doing things such as unlawful bannings would entice you to not buy the expansion
.You say unlawful banning, and I say sit down, shut up, and wait the week; It's not gonna kill you. Although it will postpone your trips to the new areas.
oh damn Gaile already responded, guess I didn't have to say nething.
E
T
X
Can you give a legit copy of the emails sent or something? If you have personal information, just wipe it off the screenshot. But if you post the general point of this to the public, Anet will be forced to rectify this error.
This might sound nosy, but it'd be nice if any of these replies you give come with solid proof. If you could give some logs of what this player was doing, shown in the publics eyes, provided that both sides seem to agree with each others proof being valid, then there shouldn't be any problems. I find it ridiculous though I can't do anything about it, that people can make claims without any sufficient proof. How much is many more? 50? 100? 100000? You say you gather logs, may the public see it to prove justice? Or is this just a test of faith? As credible as you may be seeing as your a employee of Anet, I don't think the topic poster should be taken for less just because he is a simple player while you are the PR of Anet.
Ultimately, a thread like this has people like me wanting to get the the bottom of this, and while it may end up gruesome, seeing as only three things can happen ( being either the OP is wrong, Anet is wrong, or a truely honest mistake ), it doesn't seem to be impossible to do.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ultimately, a thread like this has people like me wanting to get the the bottom of this, and while it may end up gruesome, seeing as only three things can happen ( being either the OP is wrong, Anet is wrong, or a truely honest mistake ), it doesn't seem to be impossible to do.
F
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
I guess it's appropriate to hop in with a bit of information. You can be very, very sure that we would not block an account without a good reason. The number of logs would have to be exceptional for us to even note the situation.
I am not talking 5 or 10. I am not talking dozens. I am talking many more than that. One way that people try all sorts of cheats -- hacks, dupes, account stealing -- involves log-in tricks. When we see what appears to be an enormous number of logins, we investigate. When we see other supporting information, we take action on the account. Yes, we gather logs and they are very detailed indeed. I don't think we need to apologize for doing this. In fact, I think we would need to apologize for not taking action to keep the game secure. |
Another point is that there is no message to hint that logins can be construded as a "hack attempt". So without a message to alert and suddenly "temporarily banned" I should be "happy" with my 1 week ban?
Even if ANet does decide to provide proof, let's just hope they are honourable enough to provide the exact and not the manipulated version to work in their favour. Big corporation aren't exactly famous for thier "customer interest" nor "honesty" when it comes to covering their mistakes / reputation
.On the off topic, it's amazing to find some people such as Takkun to "idiolise big coporation", thinking because they're big they must be right... Well if ONLY this is the case, wouldn't the world be a better place
Here's a reality check, big coporation does NOT mean they are always right or honest, and yes they DO make mistakes but are too stubborn to admit.Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FX8
The ONLY way to switch character is to log out and back into your own account, and this is what I do when a player requests such item.
... "banned for attempting to hack GW & banned for 168 hours (1 week ban)!". |
While my elementalist has collected lot's of bows for my ranger chars, I have to do a lot of switching chars too.
It's utterly stupid to ban an account for logging in and out.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FX8
It took me 4 emails before "actually" finding out what was wrong with my account. The first 3 replies were useless and were patronising (e.g. accusing me of cheating...). By the 4th email, someone actually "bothered" to check what happened to my account and told me that my account was temporarily suspended for the logins.
|
They can't even do simple tasks like removing ridiculous terms from the word filter list.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FX8
So far I've been banned for 6 days for a ridiculous reason. I've sent them a total of 8 emails, received 9 replies and still NO ONE has actually done anything useful (e.g. appologies for the mistake & unblock my account).
|
Your support-story is no surprise to me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FX8
I'm surprise that ANet & GW Support think it's ok to ban fair and abiding players!
|
Welcome to my world anyway.

Why is it that everyone assumes that ANet is -always- to blame? It is NOT in their best business interest to ban accounts/people without ample evidence. Given the rampant bot situation and the presence on the Net of all sorts of ideas for game exploitation and hacking, they MUST take an aggressive stand against it. A lot of you posting in this thread are also people who complain about bots and exploiters. I would rather have them banning accounts (and as Gaile said, only with ample evidence) and shutting down exploitative loopholes than the converse.
No one needs to be logging into and out of their account hundreds of times at a sitting. And this wasn't just the one time, according to what Gaile indicates ANet looks for -- it was MANY more times than that. The red flags aren't going to go up on a single incident. While the OP might have been giving this new exploit a try and was otherwise a "law abiding" player, it doesn't change the fact that he/she tried to exploit the game.
If you HONESTLY didn't, email ANet or, better, give them a telephone call and ask for more explanation specific to YOUR situation. You're not going to get it here on a public forum and, really, would you want that? They are the ONLY ones who can answer your question. Trying to garner support for your cause here doesn't do you a whole lot of good.
No one needs to be logging into and out of their account hundreds of times at a sitting. And this wasn't just the one time, according to what Gaile indicates ANet looks for -- it was MANY more times than that. The red flags aren't going to go up on a single incident. While the OP might have been giving this new exploit a try and was otherwise a "law abiding" player, it doesn't change the fact that he/she tried to exploit the game.
If you HONESTLY didn't, email ANet or, better, give them a telephone call and ask for more explanation specific to YOUR situation. You're not going to get it here on a public forum and, really, would you want that? They are the ONLY ones who can answer your question. Trying to garner support for your cause here doesn't do you a whole lot of good.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aniewiel
they MUST take an aggressive stand against it.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aniewiel
No one needs to be logging into and out of their account hundreds of times at a sitting.
|
No one needs farming.
No one needs to do the bonus on missions.
No one needs to do anything.
If exessive logging in-out is banishable: why isn't that included in the EULA?
Why isn't it stamped on the box: Beware: logging in too often will get you baned.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aniewiel
...according to what Gaile indicates ANet looks for -- it was MANY more times than that.
|
"many more times". What's that? Fuzzy logic for 50? 60? 70? 200? 300?
Do you REALLY think that the devs anticipated every hacker's potential for exploitation? That's pretty naive. And, given that we're not talking about the death penalty here, I do think a few false positives are fine if it shuts down bots and other exploiters who, in the long run, will spoil the game for everyone.
It is not our place here to make a judgement as to the "rightness" or "wrongness" of the OP's or ANet's claims. I leave that up to the people that know what the entire situation is rather than basing my decision on the OP's or Gaile's posts. If he has a problem with the decision, he needs to appeal to ANet or NCSoft and find out more detail. Obviously, Gaile's response here indicates that -she- is aware of his personal situation. I am sure that, asked the right way and to the right people (NOT tech support since this isn't a technical issue), he will get the answer he needs...though he might not like it. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
I don't want to know every instance of banning or the whys. It serves no purpose to come here, or to any other forum, and make a lot of noise about being banned. As with naming names, there is little or nothing that can be done from HERE. The only ones who can solve the situation are the people who run the servers. All a post like the OP's does is stir the collective angst of people.
It is not our place here to make a judgement as to the "rightness" or "wrongness" of the OP's or ANet's claims. I leave that up to the people that know what the entire situation is rather than basing my decision on the OP's or Gaile's posts. If he has a problem with the decision, he needs to appeal to ANet or NCSoft and find out more detail. Obviously, Gaile's response here indicates that -she- is aware of his personal situation. I am sure that, asked the right way and to the right people (NOT tech support since this isn't a technical issue), he will get the answer he needs...though he might not like it. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
I don't want to know every instance of banning or the whys. It serves no purpose to come here, or to any other forum, and make a lot of noise about being banned. As with naming names, there is little or nothing that can be done from HERE. The only ones who can solve the situation are the people who run the servers. All a post like the OP's does is stir the collective angst of people.

F
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ashley Twig
If exessive logging in-out is banishable: why isn't that included in the EULA?
Why isn't it stamped on the box: Beware: logging in too often will get you baned. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aniewiel
Do you REALLY think that the devs anticipated every hacker's potential for exploitation? That's pretty naive. And, given that we're not talking about the death penalty here, I do think a few false positives are fine if it shuts down bots and other exploiters who, in the long run, will spoil the game for everyone.
|
Aniewiel & Gail post's make total sense to me.
Since "we" do not know the full details of Arena-Net's actions it is real hard to make a judgment.
All I know is if something like this happened to me I would email to A-Net, Snail Mail to A-Net, and use up my cell phone battery calling A-Net (Figuring I would be on hold most of the time).
I would be a bulldog and not let go until I had results.
Oh...And I would be very pleasent but Firm when dealing with Arena-Net.
Since "we" do not know the full details of Arena-Net's actions it is real hard to make a judgment.
All I know is if something like this happened to me I would email to A-Net, Snail Mail to A-Net, and use up my cell phone battery calling A-Net (Figuring I would be on hold most of the time).
I would be a bulldog and not let go until I had results.
Oh...And I would be very pleasent but Firm when dealing with Arena-Net.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FX8
Yes bots are bad and may ruin the economy of the game. However banning people who have not done wrong does not help the game in anyway.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheGreatBoo
Yeah thats a great idea. First of all, they had reasonable evidence, players just disagree with this. I can understand the need for frequent character changes, but due to what I just read from gaile, theres no reason for 100 or more.
Second of all, if you hate the game community and developers so much, please leave the game. Theres no point in revolting over a one week ban. Even if they did make a mistake. It's a mistake, everyone makes them. Also, filling their inbox will do nothing but take time away from the unread and possibly urgent mailings. It may also get your email automatically sorted out and trashed. Sending continual and useless mail is childish and only proves that you would rather start problems, as opposed to fixing them. And since you're a consumer, you have to right to be a griefer? Grow up. So having a problem of your own, warrants creating problems for others and the guildwars team? Once again, grow up and if you're this angry over the matter and at the guildwars staff, please leave the game. We have enough griefers and whiners as is. |
Granted, my post looks a little OTT in a certain perspective but at least we have learned a valuable lesson from the topic....don't relog into your own account many times.
The OP got a decent reply to his problem which would have been better resolved if he had got a proper reply from support in the first place instead of Gaile having to do it.
Calling someone a griefer and a whiner and telling them to grow up isn't very productive either.
Nevertheless, i won't take offense. I am better than that.
I'm glad FX8 will have his account back soon.
X
Quote:
| Why is it that everyone assumes that ANet is -always- to blame? It is NOT in their best business interest to ban accounts/people without ample evidence. |
Quote:
| I would rather have them banning accounts (and as Gaile said, only with ample evidence) and shutting down exploitative loopholes than the converse. |
Quote:
| No one needs to be logging into and out of their account hundreds of times at a sitting. |
Quote:
| If you HONESTLY didn't, email ANet or, better, give them a telephone call and ask for more explanation specific to YOUR situation. |
Quote:
| All a post like the OP's does is stir the collective angst of people. |
Quote:
| No, banning innocents doesn't help the game. That's why the OP needs to be, as Old Warrior Dude said, a bulldog until he gets the situation resolved. Call ANet/NCSoft. Write ANet/NCSoft. Email ANet/NCSoft. It cannot be solved here. We have neither all the information nor the power to make any change for him. |
F
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheGreatBoo
Second of all, if you hate the game community and developers so much, please leave the game. Theres no point in revolting over a one week ban. Even if they did make a mistake. It's a mistake, everyone makes them.
|
Quote:
| Also, filling their inbox will do nothing but take time away from the unread and possibly urgent mailings. It may also get your email automatically sorted out and trashed. Sending continual and useless mail is childish and only proves that you would rather start problems, as opposed to fixing them. |
Quote:
| And since you're a consumer, you have to right to be a griefer? Grow up. So having a problem of your own, warrants creating problems for others and the guildwars team? Once again, grow up and if you're this angry over the matter and at the guildwars staff, please leave the game. We have enough griefers and whiners as is. |
.I don't think that ArenaNet or NCSoft owes US anything. They don't have to prove their reasoning behind bannings or any action they take against player accounts. This is -their- game and those are -their- servers. If they perceive (note the word perceive) that someone is hacking or that someone is exploiting a loophole or that someone is in violation of the EULA, they have every right to ban the account without warning or publicity. They have told us repeatedly that they will NOT give out details on their punative actions against player accounts.
*shrugs* I am not really taking a stand one way or the other. I leave that in the capable hands of the people who have all the information: FX8 and ANet/NCSoft.
*shrugs* I am not really taking a stand one way or the other. I leave that in the capable hands of the people who have all the information: FX8 and ANet/NCSoft.

