[QUOTE=Loviatar]
Quote:
Originally Posted by User Name
If Tabula Rasa is released anywhere around the Quarter 1 2006 release date of Guild Wars: Chapter 2...you'll likely see Guild Wars fall into obscurity.
QUOTE]
what most people are missing is that this game is not meant to be played constantly.
you get a good fun time out of it and put it away until the next chapter/big update.
did you get 50 dollars of good quality timewise out of it or not?
|
No, in fact I did NOT get my money's worth out of this game. As has been said many times before, but many other former players, we were lied to. I realize that doesn't matter to all of you who came later, because you were never mislead. We were.
There are few complaint threads now days because the PvP players have moved on. It became obvious Anet was never even going to admit there was a problem. Gaile Gray never went into any posts that hinted at a negative comment, and she almost never responded to any questions that were not openly kissing Anet's ass. She is the worst CSR I have ever come in contact with.
Look on the ladder for any of the top guilds. Fi, LOTD, War Machine, IVEX... They're all gone. It takes like 15 wins to make the top 50 now, and that shows you how far the quality of competition has fallen.
And just how exactly do you assume to know what this game was designed to be? You say it was never meant to be ..., but the truth is you havn't a clue WHAT it was meant to be. Even if you happened to be sleeping with Anet's resident mouthpiece, you wouldn't know. She's clueless, and seems incapable of anything other than add speak.
Gaile can play games like "the number of active accounts" if she likes. Until she explains what exactly constitutes an "active" account, it's meaningless. Are my accounts "active"? I havn't played a single second in more than a month, and probably played 2 hours in the last 2 months total. Whenever a person starts talking like a politition, your B.S. meter should be sounding the alarm.
Yes the game has gotten some positive reviews. Have you read any of them? Does it look like any of them were based off of more than 1 hour of gameplay? Do any of the reviewers sound like they even bothered to play all the way to L.A.? Why does every single one of those reviews list Anet's official line as if it were gospel? Isn't the first rule of journalism to seek the truth, and publish it? When did it become acceptable to simply quote the spokesperson and treat that as the truth unchallenged?
I've been seeing excuses for all the dead zones from the moment the game went live. First it was "it's not released in Korea yet", then it was "schools not out yet", followed by a few I can't seem to remember at the moment. Now we have come full circle and we're back to "school" as the logical culprit.
A good game doesn't need excuses, and it doesn't need a CSR to tell us it's popular either. The fact that Gaile Gray felt the need to issue that statment, in marketspeak no less, says more than has ever come out of her mouth.