Originally Posted by Mormegil
I can't see that blatant decrease in players, apart from school starting. Again, I'm amused by people who state this, since I remember people saying the same thing (in a more vibrant way also) after 1 year of D2.
It's the oldest rule of the world: say something like this and you'll find hundreds of people who have "slight impressions", "sensations", who "noticed something strange and less people to play with" and so on. Districts are still crowded, I can't see what youre talking about, frankly. |
NONE of us have access to the data. MY point was this: If everything really is just rosy, why does Anet keep the proof top secret? Are they perhaps working with the Bush administration on a method to find Bin Ladin? The way they act you'd think they were involved with Homeland Security in SOME way at least. When I pointed to D2, my main point was to show that Bliz gives us access to the numbers. We don't have to ask things like "just what does Anet consider an 'active account' anyway?".
By the way, your comments about the falloff after year 1 with D2 are taking FAR out of context. With that game a huge number of players bailed on the game because of a massive number of nerfs, which wiped out the 2 most popular builds with no way to reskill. Then, right on top of that they released the expansion, and it was seen as a betrayal.
If you're going to take a lesson from that experience, it would seem GW is in for a very rocky road over the next 6 months.
What is this need to assert that you KNOW EXACTLY what is going on in this game anyway? I and many others say that player numbers are falling off based on in game experience. Certainly it is anecdotal, but it's not hard to compare what was to what is. I'm not sure why you feel it's so dangerous to admit that there MAY be a problem.
Yes, it's clearly true that the success of Gw does not depend on anything related to Blizard, nor does it depend on anyone actualy playing GW. If nobody EVER played this game, and simply tossed their unopened boxes in the trash, Anet would still have sold that box.
HOWEVER, the media DOES follow player numbers, and occasionaly comments on them. This DOES seem to influence players future purchasing decisions. You argue nonsense like "this game is meant to be played for a while and then set aside" as though you can read the minds of the dev's. You claim that all the disgruntled PvP players that have left are whiners and good riddance, because YOU don't miss them. But you don't seem to be able to conceive of a world where they tell others to stay away from chapter 2. I currently have 2 copies of this game, and 1 friend I am now banned from ever recomending a game to again. And I myself have been out of the game for over a month. There is simply no way I would ever recomend this game to anyone else.
If you don't think my oppinion amounts to anything, what do you think the guys at LOTD or Fi are going to say about this game they seem to have abandoned entirely? Fi was not only featured in Anet's own guild of the week, but was written about in a print magazine. They're not exactly nobody, and if you don't think they can influence the future you're high.
If I were jumping into a new game that had multiple chapters, I sure as hell would do my homework before I dropped the kind of cash it takes to get fully up to speed. There is no way I'd get into Magic the Gathering now, when the player base is 1/10 of what it was when I quit. The expense of getting restarted is not met by the rewards.
Finaly, lets notice something right now. I don't claim to KNOW the future, nor do I claim to KNOW what's in the minds of the dev's. So could you please stop acting like you're active members of the Psychic Friends Network?
To take one of my favorite quotes completely out of context: "I don't know and you don't know either". We are all entitled to express an opinion, but some of you have decided that your own opinion is scientific fact and anybody who happens to disagree with you is not entitled to express it after all.