CHampion title tells it all. If someone has champion (1) he must have even some skills in gvg. (pug thumpways didnt invite random noobs from la eng1).
Champion 2 is gvg farmer with some skills.
N
|
Originally Posted by Nadine
CHampion title tells it all. If someone has champion (1) he must have even some skills in gvg. (pug thumpways didnt invite random noobs from la eng1).
Champion 2 is gvg farmer with some skills. |
|
Originally Posted by Nadine
Protector titles aren't exactly hard to get. I've seen many bad players sporting Protector titles, esp. Protector of Tyria. Grandmaster Cartographer just shows that you are very good at highly boring tasks such as wall hugging at 60 DP. What these titles have to do with success in a mission is a mystery to me.
|
|
Originally Posted by Dougal Kronik
Grandmaster Cartographer is hugging the walls at -60DP.
That is funny - especially since the poster obviously doesn't have the title either in Tyria or Cantha. I can show you screenshots of almost every area I've explored and none of them have me at more than -13 DP. Most are +10 Morale Boost. I really couldn't care less about a PvP title that you got IWAYing your Fame during the Double Fame Weekend Events. Give me a Protector or Grandmaster Cartogtropher any day of the week! |
|
Originally Posted by Relambrien
I don't care about titles at all. Here is my test, and it usually weeds out the jerks who don't want to listen.
GLFM [x mission], whisper me! Anyone who self-invites is rejected. Generally, the ones who actually do whisper are the ones who can do what they need to without being a jerk. Works fine for me ^^ |
|
Originally Posted by Tetris L
I still go by the names and typing style of people more than titles or anything else.
|
|
Originally Posted by Numa Pompilius
Yeah, same here. I wonder how many of the guys who have difficulty finding groups have 'cool' names and/or advertise for groups with leetspeek.
I sometimes think it would be interesting to make a kewl dewd named '| UR NUBZ |" & try to offensively leetspeek my way around tyria, just to see if that experience is different from using rp-names & actual English. But then I sober up again. |
| A pvp will always outperform a pve monk in all situations. They have better energy mangement and can withstand so much more shutdown and pressure. They will also usually have superior reaction times than pve monks. |
| PVP is just a much higher level of play and those that pvp will most likely be decent at pve which is so much easer. |

|
Originally Posted by nethrandr
Looking at a person's rank is a decent way of finding out whether that player is a complete noob or not. At least i know a rank 6 player will not bring mending and healing hands in his build.
A pvp will always outperform a pve monk in all situations. They have better energy mangement and can withstand so much more shutdown and pressure. They will also usually have superior reaction times than pve monks. PVP is just a much higher level of play and those that pvp will most likely be decent at pve which is so much easer. And for those that say the person could have just iwayed his rank....it still takes skill the run iway. If iway is so easy why dont you go try run iway and win the halls with it. |
|
Originally Posted by Lynxius Pardonus
i shouldve screenshoted his ass and emailed to anet to ban the noob fascist.
|
| Anyway back on topic, did you ever think that their english writing skills could simply not be very good? |
|
Originally Posted by baz777
Totally disagree with that comment. I play pve and pvp and in both I use energy management
|
|
Originally Posted by gabrial heart
Most PUG's i find don't even know how to use thier skills outside of a few cookie cutter builds. Some great examples, necros that can only mm, ritualist that can only ritlord, eles that can only do fire, monks that can only go heal, tanks without any stances....
|
|
Originally Posted by gr3g
That's pretty bottom-of-the-barrel even for pugs. Have you tried being a bit more selective in forming your groups? It's not that hard to form relatively competent pugs.
|