Originally Posted by Sir Skullcrasher
Why can't we just leave A-Net alone and let them do what they must for GW2?
|
Best post in this entire thread.

I MP I
Originally Posted by Sir Skullcrasher
Why can't we just leave A-Net alone and let them do what they must for GW2?
|
Frostlight
Originally Posted by I MP I
Quote:
![]() |
Originally Posted by Alex Weekes
It's worth the wait, everyone. Definitely. I'm bursting at the seams holding everything in waiting for a subscriber to post. I'm itching to see the discussions that erupt afterwards.
|
Agyar
Lyonette
Originally Posted by FelixCarter
I'm actually extreamily curious what ANet has planned for this thing. Will it be a "one time" switch from GW1 to GW2? Or is it constantly updated, while you continue to play GW1?
|
clawofcrimson
Croix_Raul
exiled mat
Originally Posted by fRag_Doll
That's exactly how it reads to me too.
All these people that are thinking "Yay, I'm going to keep my FOW/minipet/titles!" had better get ready for a disapointment. OK maybe, just maybe, it will turn out that we will unlock replica FOW for our GW2 toons, but I'd bet a Superior Vigor rune that anything we unlock will be cosmetic only. |
Mordakai
Originally Posted by Frostlight
Or, they could do a transfer like what other RPGs have done: make the story fit, strip all items from the transferred characters, and make all new and imported characters start at the same level.
Anet certainly would be making the right choice if it's between what they said they were going to do, and what you suggested (which is by no means the only way to go about it). |
Spartan117
Frostlight
Originally Posted by Mordakai
If you take away everything from your character, all that's left is the Name. And you can keep that.
So I'm sorry, but if my choice is between letting Anet decide how they will remake my character with the same name, or letting me remake my own character with the same name.... I'm sure I'd prefer the latter. |
lacasner
Thallandor
shoyon456
Originally Posted by Croix_Raul
Well for me and some of my friends GW:EN may well be the official end point.As for GW2 holding a wait and see stance if nothing much is change i guess we will very much move to WoW or something new after all we are starting back from scratch may as well try something new...
|
Firestone
Croix_Raul
Originally Posted by Firestone
i don't understand why anet refuses to let charc port over to GW2. IMO, this is the biggest block that PVE charcs are hesitating in getting a confirmation buy in GW2.
Meh, according to the story, its only 100 years. Shiro even managed to come back to life after 200 years. What i think should be, is for the dev. to make a side quest that allow players to port their old charcs from GW1. At least give people an option whether they wanna port their old charcs |
Originally Posted by shoyon456
started my free trial on WoW 2 days ago... im not all that disappointed
I'll be following up on what goes down, but looks like i may buy GW:EN a bit late and stop there (given that i feel like blowing the money at the time) otherwise "meh" |
Zaganher Deathbane
Originally Posted by Croix_Raul
Well for me and some of my friends GW:EN may well be the official end point.As for GW2 holding a wait and see stance if nothing much is change i guess we will very much move to WoW or something new after all we are starting back from scratch may as well try something new...
|
Croix_Raul
Originally Posted by Zaganher Deathbane
GW 2 is a new game. Would that qualify for "something new" that you would like to try about?
GW 2 would be an entirely new game. Carry over of titles and or weapons doesn't matter IMO. Trying to play another game? Why don't you try GW 2. For me, Anet listening to players' wants is what Anet separates it from other games. So they have my trust on this one |
Thallandor
Originally Posted by Croix_Raul
he he Ya burning crusade rather tempting at this point of time
|
Croix_Raul
Originally Posted by Thallandor
Come beta LOTRO with me lol. Founders $USD 199 Lifetime membership FTW.
|
Zaganher Deathbane
Originally Posted by Croix_Raul
Like i said before i am holding a wait and see stance and hope Anet delivers it
|
Lonesamurai
Marth Reynolds
Lonesamurai
Originally Posted by Marth Reynolds
I'm more curious to the transfering of character slots my self.
would be fun having 9 names preserved for your acount and only being able to make 4 ![]() |
Caith-Avar
Originally Posted by Marth Reynolds
I'm more curious to the transfering of character slots my self.
would be fun having 9 names preserved for your acount and only being able to make 4 |
Croix_Raul
Originally Posted by Marth Reynolds
It's all up to anet how theyre gonna implement it.
They might even allow us to use some armour/items from our old chars but they can also limit that number. I'm more curious to the transfering of character slots my self. would be fun having 9 names preserved for your acount and only being able to make 4 ![]() |
Knightsaber Sith
Croix_Raul
Knightsaber Sith
Croix_Raul
matt_longbow
Emi Noree
VectorGrey
Loviatar
Originally Posted by Emi Noree
With the transfers in the Hall of Monuments, do you guys really think they're going to just give your uber armor to a freshly rolled character? |
clawofcrimson
nice looking starter axe you have but here is a better stat axe i just picked up you can have for free |
Croix_Raul
Originally Posted by Emi Noree
My question to all of you is "why would you even want to transfer your characters over"? .
|
Originally Posted by Emi Noree
I mean honestly I think the most fun I ever had playing guild wars was that first week or so, when everyone was playing at about the same pace and we were all making newb mistakes, like charging into battle against the charr out at the flame temple corridor. Making this uneven playing field to make the vets somehow an "elite" class of player not only alienates new players who feel there aren't many people to play with, but just kind of harbors the exact sentiment that ANet wanted to avoid with the first GW. Remember? "Skill is what matters, not hours played"? How are you going to keep that sort of dogma when you have the vets looking down on the newbs instead of helping them out?
With the transfers in the Hall of Monuments, do you guys really think they're going to just give your uber armor to a freshly rolled character? do you even want that? I don't know what ANet is going to do any better than any of you guys, but I can tell you this: chances are likely that anything that our GW2 characters get will be either random cool junk (like the divine aura or the extra dances) or something in the vein of the pre-order bonuses we've already seen in the past (special weapons). The only thing I can think of transferring over is titles and names, and even that will likely be changed. Since it does take place 100 years later, I'd think that having a bunch of titles would give your new character an "Honorary Title", so to speak, like "Legendary Family" or the like. If you guys seriously think ANet will give you something more than a cosmetic change, something more than bragging rights to say "Hey, I've been around a long time and have random cool stuff to prove it", something that would keep the playing field from being level before we even get out of the gate...you're out of your minds . |
Originally Posted by VectorGrey
You're still going to be able to use your FoW armor on your GW1 character.
For the person who said that if achievements do not transfer directly, then GW2 is a waste of money, I have this question: How did you ever end up in Guild Wars in the first place. Since your Super Pong achievements didn't transfer to your Atari 2600, shouldn't you still be playing Pong? |
Mordakai
Croix_Raul
SotiCoto
Originally Posted by Croix_Raul
Reason being effort spend only to see it down the drain. The feeling is like kind of owning a car you customized it you brave bad weather and finally tune it till it top of the line only to see that it can no longer be driven and just waiting for time.
|
Croix_Raul