PETITION to change HoM monuments to Account Based!
Fear Me!
/signed, after so many pages of obvious reasons. It's your HOM, but ironically, you can't store anything there. I also agree with it being account based.
gone
well I'm not a big fan of the HoM (didn't use a single tapestry yet) but it's a go status for me.
all I want to request is a "HoM storage chest" (separate from Xunlai) be added to the HoM. might be worth it for me to use(HoM) for something besides replay.
all I want to request is a "HoM storage chest" (separate from Xunlai) be added to the HoM. might be worth it for me to use(HoM) for something besides replay.
MirkoTeran
/notsigned for n-th time (about making it account-based). And I don't care about storing stuff.
Phoenix Denfer
/signed make it account based.
Solas
make it account based ftw!
/signed
/signed
/signed
/signed
/signed
/signed
Reflect
/not signed
lameeeeee.... if u have done somehing on 1 character why shall all characters get it ?!
lameeeeee.... if u have done somehing on 1 character why shall all characters get it ?!
An Saighead Is Gear
/signed
12 chars
12 chars
N1ghtstalker
/signed to make mini's, weapons and titles account based in your HoM
but armors and heroes should still be the old same
but armors and heroes should still be the old same
BlackSephir
I don't really care about HoM but it's another step in our eternal fight with grind and character based crap.
/signed - For Great Sanity and Common Sense!
/signed - For Great Sanity and Common Sense!
llsektorll
/signed - Victory Is Mine... x_X
Konig Des Todes
the mini part should be account based, the other parts should be character based. Maybe, since they changed the mini pets from being customized to "dedicated" that they change it so that if a mini pet is dedicated, it can be put in other HoM of the account it is dedicated to *but that idea would screw over a ton of people who sold dedicated mini pets, myself included*. Maybe to prevent lots of QQ if this idea is done would be to make it "placed in one HoM, placed in all of that account" which could also be done for current account titles.
For the weapons, I just say let Tormented be added as well, and MAYBE endgame/elite greens.
As for complaints about the "Honor" part, just make the grind titles account based, it can be done *and imo should of been that way from day 1*.
/half-signed
For the weapons, I just say let Tormented be added as well, and MAYBE endgame/elite greens.
As for complaints about the "Honor" part, just make the grind titles account based, it can be done *and imo should of been that way from day 1*.
/half-signed
Haodu
/signed
Why won't they just do this?
Why won't they just do this?
vamperik
/signed
Since the Hom I’ve only really played on my main char as I don’t want to grind the same titles over and over.
I can see why people say that making a title account based would be wrong as that means many gw2 chars could benefit from one hall, well to get round this I would make it so once a character gets a benefit from the hall no other character can.
For example say my hom has max light bringer, max sunspear and Canthan guardian, and I have three gw2 chars I could have it so that each one could take a benefit or 1 could take three benefits.. Well something like that anyways.
Haven’t read through all the posts so hope this hasn’t already been said.
Since the Hom I’ve only really played on my main char as I don’t want to grind the same titles over and over.
I can see why people say that making a title account based would be wrong as that means many gw2 chars could benefit from one hall, well to get round this I would make it so once a character gets a benefit from the hall no other character can.
For example say my hom has max light bringer, max sunspear and Canthan guardian, and I have three gw2 chars I could have it so that each one could take a benefit or 1 could take three benefits.. Well something like that anyways.
Haven’t read through all the posts so hope this hasn’t already been said.
The Guna
I HATE the fact that everithing in HoM is costumized.. weapons and minis are the things that get on my nerve.... do i need 8 of the same minis?? hell no!!!
do i need 8 of the same weapons??? hell no!!!
GW is getting worse every day... the nerfs the constant changes in the game
just make one good change ANET plz!
do i need 8 of the same weapons??? hell no!!!
GW is getting worse every day... the nerfs the constant changes in the game
just make one good change ANET plz!
Yuhe Ji
/signed
It's almost like they're trying to encourage us to just play one character. I want to play all of mine, but that means I won't be spending time on getting that "reward" when GW 2 comes out. As of now, I'll still be on my dervish.
It's almost like they're trying to encourage us to just play one character. I want to play all of mine, but that means I won't be spending time on getting that "reward" when GW 2 comes out. As of now, I'll still be on my dervish.
Jiub
/signed because im lazy and theres no way i could max my HoM on more than one char
but, with 2+ years to GW2 i think that the majority of people have enough time to be able to max their HoM for most if not all their chars...
but, with 2+ years to GW2 i think that the majority of people have enough time to be able to max their HoM for most if not all their chars...
jcobe18
/signed
though im sure the GW2 goodies received will be based on all the HoMs on an account rather than character...i would hope spending gold on elite armor for different chars rather than one is not a bad decision
though im sure the GW2 goodies received will be based on all the HoMs on an account rather than character...i would hope spending gold on elite armor for different chars rather than one is not a bad decision
Kiragi Yagami
........
/signed. as it is, none of my characters are even CLOSE to a full hall, but if i put them together, i would be pretty close.
/signed. as it is, none of my characters are even CLOSE to a full hall, but if i put them together, i would be pretty close.
Tokar Terrius
100%
/notsigned
/notsigned
freaky naughty
/Signed, ubersigned greatest suggestion ever.
assassin shaun
/signed
its a great idea
its a great idea
nocluenoose
/Signed
its a pain to dedicated minis when u hv 10 characters
its a pain to dedicated minis when u hv 10 characters
Varkovsky
/signed... again
ScoobyDooby Dooo
im with witchblade on this only for titles, pets i wudnt even dedicate my rare 1's only have few in there....
/SIGNED
/SIGNED
Hyper.nl
/signed before.
/signed again.
This is the way I imagined HoM to be from the time of it's announcement. As a place for the achievements of a player rather than a character.
/signed again.
This is the way I imagined HoM to be from the time of it's announcement. As a place for the achievements of a player rather than a character.
Monk Gsb
/signed for this,
why exactly would i make a destroyer staff on my warrior AND customise it :S ?
why exactly would i make a destroyer staff on my warrior AND customise it :S ?
Arduin
What if your single-character-HoM unlocks stuff for your GW2-account?
hippo942
/signed
this is the reason i dont ded my pets
this is the reason i dont ded my pets
Drews0
/Signed
Some people just don't play enough to get the some 1000ectos required to a) fill 10 char's destroyer weapons display case and
b) same goes for elite armor sets
oh and some people would really enjoy not having to spend 3000hours/char to get godlike ranks
Not that I'm against the idea of investing effort... just that if Arenanet really wants us o put that much time into it, they shouldn't make huge advantages for people with no life but who get 10 full halls.
Some people just don't play enough to get the some 1000ectos required to a) fill 10 char's destroyer weapons display case and
b) same goes for elite armor sets
oh and some people would really enjoy not having to spend 3000hours/char to get godlike ranks
Not that I'm against the idea of investing effort... just that if Arenanet really wants us o put that much time into it, they shouldn't make huge advantages for people with no life but who get 10 full halls.
MithranArkanere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drews0
/Signed
Some people just don't play enough to get the some 1000ectos required to a) fill 10 char's destroyer weapons display case and b) same goes for elite armor sets oh and some people would really enjoy not having to spend 3000hours/char to get godlike ranks Not that I'm against the idea of investing effort... just that if Arenanet really wants us o put that much time into it, they shouldn't make huge advantages for people with no life but who get 10 full halls. |
Sjeng
Sorry for the thread resurrect, but here's my solution to al the HoM issues:
I really like the idea mentioned here of GW2 having a HoM displaying the weapons you placed in it in GW1, and then any character you make in GW2 could choose to take them out in the form of a "token", which can be exchanged for a "Legacy" weapon corresponding with the type of weapon in the HoM. The Legacy weapon would be a unique GW2 skin.
This would mean that the GW2 HoM would have to be ''account-wide'', so you can choose which character you created in GW2 is going to "inherit" a weapon. And you'd have to be able to choose any weapon you placed in the HoM.
This way you could create multiple classes and select the Legacy weapon you can best use on your new character(s) out of one account-wide HoM.
There is another thing I would like to see:
* Make weapons placed in the HoM ''dedicated'' and not ''customized''.
* Make the HoM's of all your characters add up in the GW2 account-wide HoM.
Why? Because now in Gw1 the HoM's are character based. We currently don't know how the Gw2 HoM will work. The way it looks now, it's not wise to spread out all your accomplishments, minipets, hero alite armor and valor weapons across your characters, because you'll end up with multiple half-filled HoM's. So to be on the safe side, people collect stuff like mini's, elite armor for heroes and themselves and destroyer weapons, and add them in the HoM of their MAIN character. This results in two problems imo:
:* Because valor weapons get customized, you can only use them on the selected main character and his/her heroes. This makes no sense to me, as I'd like to be able to use these elite weapons on my own characters, not my main characters' heroes. Make them either dedicated or, better yet, make sure all Gw1 HoM's are added up in the Gw2 HoM (which therefore should need to be account wide!), and problem solved.
:* As long as we don't know how the Gw2 HoM will work, people that like to hunt for titles and stuff to place in their HoM, will start using their secondary characters less, and their main character more. This results in less variety in classes in the game being played, which is bad imo.
So to conclude: Making the Gw2 HoM account wide AND adding up all achievements, minipets, hero armor, valor-weapons and elite armor from all your GW1 HoM's into the Gw2 HoM would ensure multiple positive things:
:* people would no longer feel the need to play ONE main character in Gw1, making the game more diverse again. (title hunting on multiple characters is more fun too imo, unless you want to have a high KoaBD title)
:* you could customize whichever weapon you like on whichever character you have on your Gw1 account to their respective HoM's, and continue using them on those characters instead of the main characters heroes. The Gw2 HoM would display them all anyway.
:* Having Elite armor on multiple characters would pay off. Of course, elite armor of a certain profession would only be availabe as "legacy" armor in Gw2 to a character of a corresponding class (which doesn't necesarily have to be the same profession, as Gw2 will probably have entirely different classes)
:* Double achievements would just be available as "legacy" titles in Gw2 as many times as you achieved them in Gw1. You could choose which characters in Gw2 inherit which titles. Same with double weapons.
Lastly I'd like to see it possible to add ALL end-game greens from ALL campaigns to the HoM. Possibly also tormented weapons.
I really like the idea mentioned here of GW2 having a HoM displaying the weapons you placed in it in GW1, and then any character you make in GW2 could choose to take them out in the form of a "token", which can be exchanged for a "Legacy" weapon corresponding with the type of weapon in the HoM. The Legacy weapon would be a unique GW2 skin.
This would mean that the GW2 HoM would have to be ''account-wide'', so you can choose which character you created in GW2 is going to "inherit" a weapon. And you'd have to be able to choose any weapon you placed in the HoM.
This way you could create multiple classes and select the Legacy weapon you can best use on your new character(s) out of one account-wide HoM.
There is another thing I would like to see:
* Make weapons placed in the HoM ''dedicated'' and not ''customized''.
* Make the HoM's of all your characters add up in the GW2 account-wide HoM.
Why? Because now in Gw1 the HoM's are character based. We currently don't know how the Gw2 HoM will work. The way it looks now, it's not wise to spread out all your accomplishments, minipets, hero alite armor and valor weapons across your characters, because you'll end up with multiple half-filled HoM's. So to be on the safe side, people collect stuff like mini's, elite armor for heroes and themselves and destroyer weapons, and add them in the HoM of their MAIN character. This results in two problems imo:
:* Because valor weapons get customized, you can only use them on the selected main character and his/her heroes. This makes no sense to me, as I'd like to be able to use these elite weapons on my own characters, not my main characters' heroes. Make them either dedicated or, better yet, make sure all Gw1 HoM's are added up in the Gw2 HoM (which therefore should need to be account wide!), and problem solved.
:* As long as we don't know how the Gw2 HoM will work, people that like to hunt for titles and stuff to place in their HoM, will start using their secondary characters less, and their main character more. This results in less variety in classes in the game being played, which is bad imo.
So to conclude: Making the Gw2 HoM account wide AND adding up all achievements, minipets, hero armor, valor-weapons and elite armor from all your GW1 HoM's into the Gw2 HoM would ensure multiple positive things:
:* people would no longer feel the need to play ONE main character in Gw1, making the game more diverse again. (title hunting on multiple characters is more fun too imo, unless you want to have a high KoaBD title)
:* you could customize whichever weapon you like on whichever character you have on your Gw1 account to their respective HoM's, and continue using them on those characters instead of the main characters heroes. The Gw2 HoM would display them all anyway.
:* Having Elite armor on multiple characters would pay off. Of course, elite armor of a certain profession would only be availabe as "legacy" armor in Gw2 to a character of a corresponding class (which doesn't necesarily have to be the same profession, as Gw2 will probably have entirely different classes)
:* Double achievements would just be available as "legacy" titles in Gw2 as many times as you achieved them in Gw1. You could choose which characters in Gw2 inherit which titles. Same with double weapons.
Lastly I'd like to see it possible to add ALL end-game greens from ALL campaigns to the HoM. Possibly also tormented weapons.
Turtle222
Rezzingthread after about 9 days because i want to say:
/signed
it is rather frustrating having to do HoM for all of your characters. I left the others and just focused on my main.
/signed
it is rather frustrating having to do HoM for all of your characters. I left the others and just focused on my main.
RyXXed
/signed
It's annoying focusing everything on one character because of GW2.
It's annoying focusing everything on one character because of GW2.
Solas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyper.nl
/signed before.
/signed again. This is the way I imagined HoM to be from the time of it's announcement. As a place for the achievements of a player rather than a character. |
This is how it should have been from the start, at least for titles armor and weapons.
Hero's and mini's im not sure but it would be great if it was all account-wide
/signed X 1 Trillion ( think thats the most that its been signed so HA!)
GW should be remembre for the great game it was and not what you did on 1 char.
Gregslot
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyXXed
/signed
It's annoying focusing everything on one character because of GW2. |
The whole system of titles and adding stuff to the HoM should be changed.
Everyone that has multiple characters would be pleased not having to play with only one character BECAUSE YOU WILL GET ANOTHER TITLE BY FOCUSING ALL YOU DO IN ONE CHARACTER (kind of a big deal).
The whole title counter should be account wide. Whats the point of vanquishing an area with one character and having to do it with another character to count? The same goes for exploring and mission and dungeons, and about everything.
Doing something with one character already proves I (the player) did it.
This way ppl who have multiple characters can be happy by plaing with all their characters if he feels like it and people who play with only one character will feel no change at all.
Like i said, titles, kind of a big deal, HoM and GW2 "rewards" killed my other 4 characters! Great!
shoyon456
yeah, /signed
Really, I enjoy my new paragon I started...however,
It seems pretty pointless to work on getting her because my derv doesn't even have many maxed titles and isn't complete.
Oh well, it won't change...
Really, I enjoy my new paragon I started...however,
It seems pretty pointless to work on getting her because my derv doesn't even have many maxed titles and isn't complete.
Oh well, it won't change...
Nightmares Hammer
/notsigned.
Just to be an asshole.
/signed
Just to be an asshole.
/signed
MithranArkanere
Well, if the grind titles were made account-wide, and since Dedicated miniatures are usually used by all characters in the account, and since armor and heroes are exclusive to characters, then only Devotion(miniatures) and Valor(weapons) are left.
Those two are the monuments that should be account wide.
Then, heroes, pets, armors and achievement titles (protector, guardian, etc) would be character-based.
Those two are the monuments that should be account wide.
Then, heroes, pets, armors and achievement titles (protector, guardian, etc) would be character-based.
Maria The Princess
/signed defenetly
i hate feeling that by maxing out/grinding a title on one character is a waste cuz i shoudl have done this onmy main
i hate feeling that by maxing out/grinding a title on one character is a waste cuz i shoudl have done this onmy main
legion_rat
/signed
To much time to grind that many chars.
~the rat~
To much time to grind that many chars.
~the rat~