Don't want to from with a secondary profession
isamu kurosawa
There realy isn't anything else we can say on this. If he absolutely refuses to see the point then he is beyond help.
Flem
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyla salanari
You took a peak in my GWG Account and seen "Occupation: Schoolin'", and over in England the ages at secondary school are minimum 12, so you chose that age because it's the lowest of that school. I know, people do it to others ALOT.
Please tell me that wasn't a blatant cheap shot - you're arguments are bad, face it. Along with your assumptions.
Bad is an opinion.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by - Tain -
"Standing there picking your nose" is an expression used to convey doing nothing useful. I sure hope you aren't lumping me in with your immaturity comments.
I already addressed this though, you are just recycling your topics.
Pressing 1-8 for offensive skills or def. skills results in the same out come.
Flem
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earth
If everybody disagrees with you, don't you think you may be wrong after all? |
Knowing what is best in a video game is an opinion.
Everyone doesn't agree with me, just this forum's vets. In game far more teams use tanks then imbagon.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by isamu kurosawa
There realy isn't anything else we can say on this. If he absolutely refuses to see the point then he is beyond help.
LOL, how is it that it's ME that doesn't see the point. It's YOU that doesnt understand versatility
Tyla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem
LOL, I totally did not do that. I also did not know that part about England. It was a figure of speach in which I apologized for, until my last post got deleted... for some reason.
Bad is an opinion. Then if your post got deleted I see it right for my post to be deleted aswell, as it has no point at that moment. You should watch yourself, and not use stupid, immature flames like that... But I don't believe what you said there. At all.
- Tain -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem
Everyone doesn't agree with me, just this forum's vets. In game far more teams use tanks then imbagon. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flem
LOL, how is it that it's ME that doesn't see the point. It's YOU that don't understand versatility
How is it "not understanding versatility" to say that using a dedicated tank is less effective? There is nothing versatile about a player loaded with 8 defensive skills.
Flem
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyla salanari
But I don't believe what you said there. At all. |
I have no way to prove it. All I have is my word. Take it or leave it, I guess.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by - Tain -
It's also a known fact that there are far more bad players in the game than good ones.
How is it "not understanding versatility" to say that using a dedicated tank is less effective? There is nothing versatile about a player loaded with 8 defensive skills. What makes Guru posters not "bad players". Also, that is not a known fact, that is your opinion. Once again (I have said this about 30 times) there are all forms of tanks, and some might not need to have a full bar of def. skills. And versatile not specifically about a tank, about other options INCLUDING tanking. Why is this concept so hard for you to grasp.
Dr Strangelove
I find it completely hilarious that he's arguing for tanknspank, a notoriously cookie cutter build with no flexibility imported from every other game in the genre, yet still keeps throwing out statements about diversity. Meanwhile, the "elitist build dictators" are arguing for more diversified bars.
Tyla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem
I have no way to prove it. All I have is my word. Take it or leave it, I guess. |
Quote:
It's about people knowing, what's tried tested and works best.
Quote:
|
Once again (I have said this about 30 times) there are all forms of tanks, and some might not need to have a full bar of def. skills. And versatile not specifically about a tank, about other options INCLUDING tanking.
Yeah, a Monk throwing enchants on you and you covering aggro, if it breaks, who cares? The Monks should be able to handle it. - That doesn't = Tanking. It's PvE after all.
Flem
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Strangelove
I find it completely hilarious that he's arguing for tanknspank, a notoriously cookie cutter build with no flexibility imported from every other game in the genre, yet still keeps throwing out statements about diversity. Meanwhile, the "elitist build dictators" are arguing for more diversified bars.
As I have said SO MANY TIMES!!! HOLY FREAKING CRAP!! I am not arguing JUST FOR TANKING! I am arguing for the fact that it is a viable option among many others.
Also, there are lots of dif. ways to tank. Tyla
No there isn't different ways to tank - grab aggro on a 100% defensive bar.
Nothing you can change there.
Flem
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyla salanari
Sorry? I'm biased? You're just stubborn.
There are some bad GWG posters, believe it or not. It's about people knowing, what's tried tested and works best. Yeah, a Monk throwing enchants on you and you covering aggro, if it breaks, who cares? The Monks should be able to handle it. - That doesn't = Tanking. It's PvE after all. One could argue that you are as/or more stubborn then me. I don't find that hard to believe at all. One player taking aggro/dmg = tanking...no matter how you slice it. Tyla
And when aggro breaks, it isn't tanking. It's a char spot even more useless than it already is.
It's usually a party-wipe for a Tank&Spank. Isn't really tanking when you're doing damage now, is it?
Div
I can safely say the OP's question about secondary professions has been answered and that he is satisfied with the answer. I take fault in letting this thread continue to get derailed by not closing it after the first few posts.
|
