Who doesn't have a warrior?
Spaced Invader
Judging from your avatar, it doesn't really matter, does it?
shure
I'm playing almost from the beggining (3 years next month) and I never made a warrior untill two months ago. But I've made it only for farming, so I got myself quick run to the Rata sum and started farming event items. Never bothered to do any missions with him, I prefer my monk 
Metalmaster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Destro Maniak
my fav sin is already fow and best stuff
EDIT: BTW my sin can kill any warrior 1v1. |
Balrock Sofang
Ive played over 2 and a half years, warrior was my second character, since then ive made one of every class(to level 20) ...and 4 mesmers all to 20, lol.
If you think warriors dont have good damage, you honestly shouldnt be playing a warrior.
If you think warriors dont have good damage, you honestly shouldnt be playing a warrior.
~ Dan ~
I've rolled PvP only warriors, but never PvE.
Sparda
I do not wish to play wammo.
And i do not care about it.
And don't waste my char slots on them
I always think of one word when i see one "stupid wammo"
greetzzzz
And i do not care about it.
And don't waste my char slots on them
I always think of one word when i see one "stupid wammo"
greetzzzz
Zahr Dalsk
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Destro Maniak
EDIT: BTW my sin can kill any warrior 1v1.
|
Spaced Invader
I you know the Assassin build beforehand, you will always be able to create a Warrior build to defeat it.
And vice versa.
[e]Of course this holds true for every Class X vs. Class Y duel, which is why A.Net never has and never will support (real) 1 vs. 1 PvP in GW1.
And vice versa.
[e]Of course this holds true for every Class X vs. Class Y duel, which is why A.Net never has and never will support (real) 1 vs. 1 PvP in GW1.
BlackSephir
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sparda
I do not wish to play wammo.
And i do not care about it. And don't waste my char slots on them I always think of one word when i see one "stupid wammo" greetzzzz |
Kattar
I have one.
But the only reason I have it is because someone gave it to me along with an account.
And I don't play it that much either.
So there, give me my cookie damnit.
But the only reason I have it is because someone gave it to me along with an account.
And I don't play it that much either.
So there, give me my cookie damnit.
bhavv
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlackSephir
And when you look at other warriors than wammos?
|
Dark Kal
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhavv
There are far better skills to take in PVE, most of which are in hammer mastery.
|
Shadowhaze
I have one. Now where is my cookie?!
Spaced Invader
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shadowhaze
I have one. Now where is my cookie?!
|
Please double check the OP's options.
legacyofkain85
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drey2k
Another question:
Why wouldn't you have a warrior? It looks the coolest and totally kicks arse  |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ulterion
I have one of every profession. It's wise to immerse yourself knowedge-wise to become more proficient at the game in both PvE and PvP aspects.
Also, what's with having multiples of the same profession? I think it's a waste of a character slot to have more than one. Kewl Avatar, Faer. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FlamingMetroid
I made a warrior but assassins are better so.....
*runs away with flame shield on* |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fenix
You're in ZoS, don't you mean R/Ds kick more ass?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GloryFox
Yes I have a Warrior, but I don't play him anymore since stances suck big time. There was a time where a Stance Warrior kicked serious butt. Now days any Dervish or Assassin can mop them up. Paragons in Groups can out Fight Warriors in Groups any day of the week.
Yeah... Warriors suck now. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by therangereminem
warrior is worse class in the game i dont have one never will have one think they should be taken out of the game they should make a warrior for guilds that is act a good tank prof and does damage there toons other wasy to tank and you dont even use warrior skills
example my ranger tnaked goa areas before ursan alot faster then any other build and didnt die liek a warrior die and take forever |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bart
I have 3 warriors, 1 sword, 1 axe and 1 hammer.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cuthroat Dibbler
Necros and mesmers....proof that flashy armor aint worth squat! |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by t00115577
No, warriors are lame meele chars, sins and dervs own them every time, in every situation
|
sorry i could not help not posting that,btw u are a bit off with that statement
Sparda
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlackSephir
And when you look at other warriors than wammos?
|
i admit i have seen others W/R W/E W/P but farmost all are Wammos
And not many are good in playing it i rather play with killroy
reanimatorX
I play guild wars, first character is a warrior, I play him alot.
I play world of warcraft, first character is a warrior, I play him ALOT.
I play diablo 2, first char was a barb, I played him alot.
some people like casters, I would rather bash some skulls.
I play world of warcraft, first character is a warrior, I play him ALOT.
I play diablo 2, first char was a barb, I played him alot.
some people like casters, I would rather bash some skulls.
Shadowhaze
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spaced Invader
I am sorry to inform you that you do not qualify for the receipt of a cookie.
Please double check the OP's options. |
Aww, I thought we could get one anyway.
But anyway, I think my war was like my second char I started.
bhavv
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dark Kal
Learn to play. Seriously, you have no idea what you're talking about.
|
zeekay
34 months and never made a pve war before ... only pvp
Dark Kal
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhavv
I obviously know more then you lol. If you disagree that Hammer Mastery > Swords and Axes, your a crap warrior.
|
Orange Milk
Once, long ago, 3 of said, "let's all make new cahracters and meet in Pre and do this all again" so we did, and when we met in Pre we were all on Warriors. So I said "BRB" deleteed the Warrior and rolled a Necro. That is the extent of my PvE Warrioring in a little more than 2 years in GW, in fact in that time I've only ever taken 1 (one) PvE character to lvl 20, a Ranger.
I do have a PvP Only Warrior though.
I do have a PvP Only Warrior though.
inf3st
I've played since GW creation and I don't have a warrior. They bore me.
moriz
yes i do have a warrior.
as for all the arguments about warriors vs assassins vs dervishes: here's the definitive answer:
if you are bad, your warrior will be bad, and you'll play the assassin and dervish to greater effect.
if you are good, your warrior will be >>>>>> your assassin and dervish.
----
the assassin is made so bad players can compete, and good players can play one while doing their programming homework. the dervish is nothing more than a mending wammo's wet dream.
as for all the arguments about warriors vs assassins vs dervishes: here's the definitive answer:
if you are bad, your warrior will be bad, and you'll play the assassin and dervish to greater effect.
if you are good, your warrior will be >>>>>> your assassin and dervish.
----
the assassin is made so bad players can compete, and good players can play one while doing their programming homework. the dervish is nothing more than a mending wammo's wet dream.
Jeremy Untouchable
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FireFox
played from day 1 and have no warrior
|
ThunderStruck
I have a warrior, and this thread is hilarious. I love the uniformed people hating on warriors who get shot down and don't even respond.
drey2k
Ye I'm surprised at all this hate...
I personally think many of the classes are cool. Assassins freegin rule. I'm probably going to start one after I finish working on my new necro.
But my warrior is my main character and I love it too. A lot of the armor looks awesome, they're big, and have cool looking weapons. They're pretty vital to PUGS too.
I think people who say that warriors are newbie characters are seriously uninformed, or they're just jealous that they never had the time to make a warrior or sucked at playing one when they made one. There's a huge difference between playing a warrior for 1 month, and playing one for a year, just like for any other profession.
I personally think many of the classes are cool. Assassins freegin rule. I'm probably going to start one after I finish working on my new necro.
But my warrior is my main character and I love it too. A lot of the armor looks awesome, they're big, and have cool looking weapons. They're pretty vital to PUGS too.
I think people who say that warriors are newbie characters are seriously uninformed, or they're just jealous that they never had the time to make a warrior or sucked at playing one when they made one. There's a huge difference between playing a warrior for 1 month, and playing one for a year, just like for any other profession.
bhavv
Well I can do everything in the game without warriors. Its funny that a lot of people that post that they like playing warriors also say that they find mesmers confusing lol.
It takes far more skill to play mesmer then any other class, and Sins are the most skillful melee class.
Really, what I hate most about warriors is that they are epic boring. Click on target, press Power Attack. Click on next target, press Power attack. Oh noes enchant drain! Press mending. Oh noes Im on 25% health. Frenzy heal sig.
I was playing RA earlier and a warrior clicked on frenzy inside my savannah heat and just stood there attacking our monk. He died in 2 or 3 seconds.
It takes far more skill to play mesmer then any other class, and Sins are the most skillful melee class.
Really, what I hate most about warriors is that they are epic boring. Click on target, press Power Attack. Click on next target, press Power attack. Oh noes enchant drain! Press mending. Oh noes Im on 25% health. Frenzy heal sig.
I was playing RA earlier and a warrior clicked on frenzy inside my savannah heat and just stood there attacking our monk. He died in 2 or 3 seconds.
netniwk
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhavv
I was playing RA earlier and a warrior clicked on frenzy inside my savannah heat and just stood there attacking our monk. He died in 2 or 3 seconds. |
your point?
bhavv
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netniwk
And I met an IW mesmer trying to take on my warior with a hammer(!) today.
your point? |
And frenzying in a savannah heat isnt the same as a crap build. I could run an IW hammer mes for fun if I wanted, but I still wouldnt stand still in AoE.
Heroes and hench are better at kiting then the majority of warriors.
Bryant Again
Wow. There is seriously no reason for this flame fight. Bad players exist in all professions.
Warriors may have the most "newbies" in them, but that's because the Warrior is a universally popular class - meaning not just in Guild Wars. I'm very confident you'll find the sword-and-board fighter class the most popular in nearly every RPG.
Warriors may have the most "newbies" in them, but that's because the Warrior is a universally popular class - meaning not just in Guild Wars. I'm very confident you'll find the sword-and-board fighter class the most popular in nearly every RPG.
bhavv
Well, the medal for the class in RA least likely to have or remember to use a res sig...
Warriors.
This isnt flaming. Its a clear observation of how people play the game. There are some very good (hammer) warriors in arenas too, but they are vastly outnumbered, and far more then in any other class, by people that are bad at the proffesion. This in turn gives warriors a bad name.
Also whenever I used to pug and I got a warrior, they were ALWAYS a tank. Your in a team with 2 or 3 monks, you dont need survival skills, you need to do damage.
Warriors.
This isnt flaming. Its a clear observation of how people play the game. There are some very good (hammer) warriors in arenas too, but they are vastly outnumbered, and far more then in any other class, by people that are bad at the proffesion. This in turn gives warriors a bad name.
Also whenever I used to pug and I got a warrior, they were ALWAYS a tank. Your in a team with 2 or 3 monks, you dont need survival skills, you need to do damage.
Bryant Again
By "clear observation" I'm assuming the observation and game experience of a large amount of people. Just because you run
That said my experience has been rather mixed. I do run into a lot of bad warriors, but I see so many bad players in other professions that class no longer matters.
That said my experience has been rather mixed. I do run into a lot of bad warriors, but I see so many bad players in other professions that class no longer matters.
bhavv
The only warriors that I have seen that play it right are ones in my HA groups or from my alliance for HM. There are people bad at every class yes, but in simple terms, there are far less monks with mending then there are warriors.
Squishy ftw
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bhavv
The only warriors that I have seen that play it right are ones in my HA groups or from my alliance for HM. There are people bad at every class yes, but in simple terms, there are far less monks with mending then there are warriors.
|
Shadowmere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moriz
yes i do have a warrior.
as for all the arguments about warriors vs assassins vs dervishes: here's the definitive answer: if you are bad, your warrior will be bad, and you'll play the assassin and dervish to greater effect. if you are good, your warrior will be >>>>>> your assassin and dervish. ---- the assassin is made so bad players can compete, and good players can play one while doing their programming homework. the dervish is nothing more than a mending wammo's wet dream. |
That being said keep in mind that warriors have a lot more options as far as what they can do to an enemy, I still maintain that Earth Shaker is one of the most devestating things a warrior can do, nobody can match that kind of AoE KD (not to mention hammers pack a wicked punch in the first place).
As far as dervs they're what you do instead of playing W/Mo, lots of enchantments and a primary att that actually works with the enchanting. I enjoy them as well they're an interesting bunch.
drey2k
I've played with many PvE assassins in my parties... and most of them were horrible. I think it takes skill, a good build and an appropriate situation to be a good assassin in PvE. In the whole time I played the game, and in all the pugs i've been in, I think I came across 2 decent assassins.
Warriors are more versatile, and I think they're easier to play in PvE.
I really don't think sins are better for PvE. I've never played one yet personally, but from what I've seen, warrior just seems to fit more situations. For PvP, I prefer sin because it is just more fun to play.
Warriors are more versatile, and I think they're easier to play in PvE.
I really don't think sins are better for PvE. I've never played one yet personally, but from what I've seen, warrior just seems to fit more situations. For PvP, I prefer sin because it is just more fun to play.
bhavv
Sins are FAR better for PVE. Moebius and death blossom are better then the whole line of skills warriors have. They do just about everything better then warriors except for knockdown. No one ever wants sins or mesmers in their party though, thats why people assume that warriors are better because its easier to find a group.
Bryant Again
DS Dps is still uber-deadly, though (now that I researched).
bhavv
Ive tried E/A with the following bar in H/H:
Asuran Scan
Glimmering Mark
Fox Strike
Wild Strike
Nine Tail Strike
Whirlwind
Tenais Wind
Conjure Lightning
126 damage per second over 5 seconds, 94 damage per second over 30 seconds. Sins would be even more powerful.
Asuran Scan
Glimmering Mark
Fox Strike
Wild Strike
Nine Tail Strike
Whirlwind
Tenais Wind
Conjure Lightning
126 damage per second over 5 seconds, 94 damage per second over 30 seconds. Sins would be even more powerful.