Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavv
Dervishs truly made warriors obsolete. They accomplished what sins couldnt. Why have a warrior (besides the looks and hammer knock downs) when you can have the much more versatile dervish?
|
Look at the Warrior bar you usually see in GvG.
3 second KD's, 2 of them on a bar (Bull's Strike, Shock).
Interrupt, D-Chop.
Then you have your common skills.
Evis, Exe Strike, Frenzy, Rush and ofcourse, Res Sig.
With Dervs, sure you can use secondary professions, but they don't get a movement stance, an 100% upkeep IAS, 3 second KD's (two on the bar) and a 20 disable interrupt.
Warriors also have higher armour.
Now let's take a full look at Dervs. HoF, not 100% upkeep. Unless you hit the bonus on your 20% Enchantments staff. AoM, which can't be kept up indefinately unless in PvE. Lack of Stonefist Insignia.
But yeah, Dervs make a better (What I like to call) Energy Spiker.
On the other hand, again, Warriors get 100% upkeep IAS, cheap speedboost, more KD time, and a sexy interrupt.
Dervs aren't nearly as versatile in competetive play, because people usually carry certain counters (e.g - Enchantment Removal) that are common. And AoM isn't 100% upkeep, if it was, it would be imba. Also HoF isn't 100% upkeep. Which also poses a problem.