Who doesn't have a warrior?
10 pages • Page 7
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by therangereminem
warrior is worse class in the game i dont have one never will have one think they should be taken out of the game they should make a warrior for guilds that is act a good tank prof and does damage there toons other wasy to tank and you dont even use warrior skills
example my ranger tnaked goa areas before ursan alot faster then any other build and didnt die liek a warrior die and take forever |
I don't have a Warrior, never will until they take Paragon out of the game
D
s
o
I have one...but i never play her and she is now officially my mule as i deleted my paragon to make a sin...i really gotta build her up, but am too immeresed in titling up (and it's a word if it makes sense to you : ) my main char an ele
gotta seriously get used to running in and attacking..my brain always say *wtf are you doing get back you retard*
i like my derv better
she's low level cause i'm making her survivor...being real carfeul lol
gotta seriously get used to running in and attacking..my brain always say *wtf are you doing get back you retard*
i like my derv better
M
T
I want my cookie. Now.
I do have one but he's standing next to a bin.
Warriors have sexy damage. Although I prefer screwing things up instead of killing them. I just help them out sometimes.
I'm trying so hard to not /point /laugh at this, and then top it off with a few flames.
Edit -- This thread is hilarious! Keep up the "Warriors suck" posts!
I've not disagreed with you much before, Fenix, but...if you think Paragons are only good because of SY and TNTF I think you need to learn about Paragons...
I do have one but he's standing next to a bin.
Warriors have sexy damage. Although I prefer screwing things up instead of killing them. I just help them out sometimes.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by t00115577
No, warriors are lame meele chars, sins and dervs own them every time, in every situation
|
Edit -- This thread is hilarious! Keep up the "Warriors suck" posts!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fenix
Pretty sure if you have to stance tank, or tank of any kind, you're bad.
Also, Paragons have FAR less dps than a Warrior. They reason they're good is because of their SY! and TNTF spam. That is all. |
D
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drey2k
Another question:
Why wouldn't you have a warrior? It looks the coolest and totally kicks arse ![]() |
I got a warrior, 3rd char I created, been my main ever since.
There should be one more option on the poll: I have a "tank" not a warrior - that way everyone who chooses that can get an IP ban.
The level of idiocy of some of these posts show that some people either 1. have a warrior and have no idea how to use it or 2. dont know what a warrior is supposed to do or 3. dont understand Guild Wars.
Anyone who says wars dont do much damage or dont do as much as other professions, have no idea how to play a warrior. Its no wonder there are so many bad warriors when you read alot of the posts in this thread.
Those who say 1 on 1(not that there are any in this thread i didnt read all posts but i hear this alot) a warrior will loose against any other class or what not, doesnt understand Guild Wars. Theres a reason theres no 1v1 arena (the 1v1 we have isnt true 1v1 you still have 3 heros), 1v1 doesnt belong in Guild Wars, it proves nothing, and means nothing.
Now if you find the playstyle boring and thats why you dont have one thats fine, but the ones who dont like wars cause they do crap damage, should be removed, suck, or whatever other absurd things are said in this thread should just shut the hell up until they know what they are talking about.
some of these posts (like the one Mickey quoted) should go in the You Laugh You Lose thread.
There should be one more option on the poll: I have a "tank" not a warrior - that way everyone who chooses that can get an IP ban.
The level of idiocy of some of these posts show that some people either 1. have a warrior and have no idea how to use it or 2. dont know what a warrior is supposed to do or 3. dont understand Guild Wars.
Anyone who says wars dont do much damage or dont do as much as other professions, have no idea how to play a warrior. Its no wonder there are so many bad warriors when you read alot of the posts in this thread.
Those who say 1 on 1(not that there are any in this thread i didnt read all posts but i hear this alot) a warrior will loose against any other class or what not, doesnt understand Guild Wars. Theres a reason theres no 1v1 arena (the 1v1 we have isnt true 1v1 you still have 3 heros), 1v1 doesnt belong in Guild Wars, it proves nothing, and means nothing.
Now if you find the playstyle boring and thats why you dont have one thats fine, but the ones who dont like wars cause they do crap damage, should be removed, suck, or whatever other absurd things are said in this thread should just shut the hell up until they know what they are talking about.
some of these posts (like the one Mickey quoted) should go in the You Laugh You Lose thread.

