22 Jan 2006 at 02:48 - 60
I don't even have R3, I'm just above the beginning of R2. However, I usually don't do tombs in full PuGs unless someone is advertising an unusual (maybe fun) group, which I know probably doesn't have chances. I, instead will PM other players in my list (PvE and PvP players I have met) to start a group, then pick the last one or two from the district (helps to meet new people). I almost never pick anyone new who is advertising their rank, though. I don't know if rank is good or bad. I think the people that rely on rank to build their groups just don't have enough friends in the game (which they should if they've been playing well enough to get that much rank) to start their own party. If we run into an idiot (not read as n00b or unskilled, because that can be taught in time) that won't listen or goes haywire, well, the rest of the group is still there when I kick him.
In the past when I have picked randomly to fill our group, I've experienced people with higher rank lack the tolerance to stick with a group if things don't go well at first. Usually the last word from them would be n00bs before they quit (before the round is even over), much like people who quit in missions when things don't go perfect in pve. I'm sure there are tons of PvP players with high rank that don't do this (probably the majority), but I suspect that those do have enough friend and don't spend their time advertising LFG with so and so rank. In essence, rank may not mean too much at all. Those that have high rank and do well probably have friends (like I saw a poster (EDIT: It was JR I believe) says he PM's someone on his list, asks if they need a monk, and takes his monk). I like to pick up one or two people in the district just because it allows my list to grow a bit and may give someone a chance.
Like I said, though, I'm not even rank 3 and play PvE as well as PvP. I am not in the 100,000 dollar championship, either. I like the challenge, but sometimes I like to just have fun (even with stupid builds - aka atog and old-skool magic:tg theme builds that were fun). I am not a casual player (I play PvE too much to really be casual), but I do play PvP casually. So the quiestion about how this is handled by ANet (if it even needs to be) is more or less, are they targeting casual play or more hardcore play...
As far as suggestions (since I don't want to post without offering a suggestion), I think that varied arenas (read: effects/terrain) would be interesting instead of just straight build vs build. If you think it should be more like basketball (where the arena differences are minor), then this is already perfect for you. If you think it should be more like offroad racing, golf, or the likes, then varied arenas (not just looks, but effects on play) would be a nice alternate tournament, something similar to the various levels in Dragon's Lair in PvE, or the random/team arena where you encounter poison and/or lava, or quicksand in the GvG arena (desert isle). Now that would not only show a team's ability to design a build (or copy one), but to even adapt it to different arenas while fighting.
Of course I'm sure someone will say it's Player vs Player and that terrains (read: environments) belong in PvE. Well, then make it like a big basketball court with nothing in it but walls and go at it. An yeah, both sides have a few idiots here, a few ppl who want things like Burger King gives it to them with a few ppl on the other side who are indeed elitist asses. Unfortunately, when people from either side tell people to run off to another game or if they don't like it they can leave, it hurts the rest of us that enjoy the larger numbers of people here. Take a look at any massive world that's lost their userbase (aka ghost towns). Even whiners can be more useful than a henchie sometimes (and I really do mean sometimes lol).
As far as the elitism goes (I don't see it all the time, just like the burger king people in these forums), that is the quickest way to kill a game. Being elite does no good when you're the only one there. ANet has explained time and again they are targeting a wider audience than traditional massive games (the casual player). Though with the tourney and all going on in taipei, that may just be a statement of intent and not fact. Plz don't ask for proof of anything btw. If you want proof, send me a subpoena. This is a forum, not a courtroom. If something is outlandish, call them on it and let everyone else make up their minds. Calling for proof is almost as bad as Godwin's Law. If they are wrong and you don't have a strong enough argument to show they are wrong (and if you think that people will ACTUALLY believe them if they are so wrong), show the proof yourself to prove they are wrong.
I love the Battle Isles :-)