A solution to negativity: Charge a monthly fee

Talesin Darkbriar

Talesin Darkbriar

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2005

California - irrigated desert...

The Myrmidon

E/N

/dodges missiles and flaming objects

I know, I know! ANet said the game is "free" once you purchase it and will only charge for future expansions and such.

Here's why they should charge a modest monthly fee to play:

1.) It immediately removes 99.9% of the complete morons currently polluting the game. Don't even get me started; there's been enough threads on the average IQ of the atypical GW player, and its in the single digits.
(No, your normal or high IQ doesn't compensate for the other 99%)

2.) It adds positive reinforcement to naming policy and bannable offenses.
Who cares how they act once they've steamrolled through the game once with their Warrior/Monk already? This is the consensus I get from GW idiots everywhere. Add a monthly fee - something to lose - and they will be better behaved.

3.) It provides ANet with the operating capital to ramp up operations if desired.How many posts here are asking for more expansions?
Look, EQ2 charges $15.00 a month PLUS incidentals for what is by all accounts a broken, unbalanced, worthless slug of a game. They still have players in the 10's of thousands who just can't part with their cash quick enough.
If ANet charged even a modest $7.00 per month it would still be the online deal of the 21st century. If you can cough up $50 for the game, $7 is skipping one lunch at McDonalds - come on, its not unreasonable.

4.) A monthly fee adds a "legitimacy" to Guild Wars that non-players assume does not exist.
My dork friends are all still playing EQ2.
Why?
First of all, they spout "Guild Wars only has 20 levels - how could it possibly be any good." (I send screenshots and they tell me they are doctored lol...)
Secondly, their logic follows, "And they don't even charge a fee to play it, so we know it's not any good."

Charge a fee, and these players will suddenly raise their eyebrows and say collectively, "hmm...maybe I will check that out."
Simple human psychology 101.

In closing, flame at will if you must, but the possibility of ANet adding a modest monthly fee would actually improve the gaming community as well as provide them with the resources to do bigger and better things.

/dons firesuit

Talesin

Jwh6913

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Apr 2005

Death Infernal Evil

Mo/R

the day they start charging, I will leave GW forever

Slade xTekno

Slade xTekno

Rawr.

Join Date: Apr 2005

Read or Die Stooge Forum

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talesin Darkbriar
/dodges missiles and flaming objects

I know, I know! ANet said the game is "free" once you purchase it and will only charge for future expansions and such.

Here's why they should charge a modest monthly fee to play:

1.) It immediately removes 99.9% of the complete morons currently polluting the game. Don't even get me started; there's been enough threads on the average IQ of the atypical GW player, and its in the single digits.
(No, your normal or high IQ doesn't compensate for the other 99%)

2.) It adds positive reinforcement to naming policy and bannable offenses.
Who cares how they act once they've steamrolled through the game once with their Warrior/Monk already? This is the consensus I get from GW idiots everywhere. Add a monthly fee - something to lose - and they will be better behaved.

3.) It provides ANet with the operating capital to ramp up operations if desired.How many posts here are asking for more expansions?
Look, EQ2 charges $15.00 a month PLUS incidentals for what is by all accounts a broken, unbalanced, worthless slug of a game. They still have players in the 10's of thousands who just can't part with their cash quick enough.
If ANet charged even a modest $7.00 per month it would still be the online deal of the 21st century. If you can cough up $50 for the game, $7 is skipping one lunch at McDonalds - come on, its not unreasonable.

4.) A monthly fee adds a "legitimacy" to Guild Wars that non-players assume does not exist.
My dork friends are all still playing EQ2.
Why?
First of all, they spout "Guild Wars only has 20 levels - how could it possibly be any good." (I send screenshots and they tell me they are doctored lol...)
Secondly, their logic follows, "And they don't even charge a fee to play it, so we know it's not any good."

Charge a fee, and these players will suddenly raise their eyebrows and say collectively, "hmm...maybe I will check that out."
Simple human psychology 101.

In closing, flame at will if you must, but the possibility of ANet adding a modest monthly fee would actually improve the gaming community as well as provide them with the resources to do bigger and better things.

/dons firesuit

Talesin
1] I don't know. America lacks a form of alternate payment for online games like this. We'd still have the dumb ones, and, since the parents are now paying, maybe even dumber. Our average IQ may drop to that of the British royal family.

2] True. One of the reasons we have such a collection of brats in Guild Wars is the fact that there is nothing to lose. I'd be crying if I lost an account I'd been paying a monthly fee for.

3] Again, America lacks an alternative form of easy payment. Most of the online gaming fees in this country are paid by credit card, most of which are by parents.
This could work in Korea, though. There, phone companies will pick up the monthly fee and simply add it to your bill every month for convenience [and business]. It allows those with even just a cell phone [which everyone there has] to pay for any game they wish to play.

4] But, who wants those guys? I recall someone posting somewhere on this forum "the point of an rpg is to show off your gear and level." He could've used a suit like yours.

liuzg

liuzg

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

W/N

"There are two thing that are infinite-human stupidity and the universe,and i am not even sure of the latter."
---Albert Einstein

rwt2006

rwt2006

Academy Page

Join Date: Jun 2005

Texas

American Border Patrol

W/

im going to agree/disagree

yes it will remove the lame ppl, but i have to disagree because i'm already paying for 1 monthly fee, i can't afford 2. but all in all if i could id be 110% for it, id probably switch to GW even if they did now that i think about it...

Slade xTekno

Slade xTekno

Rawr.

Join Date: Apr 2005

Read or Die Stooge Forum

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by liuzg
"There are two thing that are infinite-human stupidity and the universe,and i am not even sure of the latter."
---Albert Einstein
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
~Albert Einstein

crazy diamond

crazy diamond

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Jun 2005

I somehow doubt that adding a monthly fee will somehow reduce the amount of complaints.

If people pay a monthly fee they'll expect to get things their way even more.

Swampgirl Inez

Swampgirl Inez

"I love reading trash!"

Join Date: May 2005

Home Again

I was in a "paying" MMO for two years. If anything, the whining/complaing/etc was even worse. Much worse. If people pay for something, they feel they have the right to 'demand' anything and everything.

rwt2006

rwt2006

Academy Page

Join Date: Jun 2005

Texas

American Border Patrol

W/

Quote:
I was in a "paying" MMO for two years. If anything, the whining/complaing/etc was even worse. Much worse. If people pay for something, they feel they have the right to 'demand' anything and everything.
I had completely forgot about that too, guess i tuned it out over the course of 2 years, well another reason to disagree

liuzg

liuzg

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

W/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slade xTekno
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
~Albert Einstein
Means the same thing.......

crazy diamond

crazy diamond

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Jun 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by liuzg
Means the same thing.......
One is an accurate quote, the other one isn't.

Talesin Darkbriar

Talesin Darkbriar

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2005

California - irrigated desert...

The Myrmidon

E/N

Please feel free to be specific.
This topic does not seek to address the fact that some people complain period.

liuzg

liuzg

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

W/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy diamond
One is an accurate quote, the other one isn't.
Yeah,though the msg conveyed is there.

oostdyk

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Jun 2005

A fee does not remove idiots per se. It might remove them. Lineage 2 had a monthly fee... it was littered with idiots nonetheless...

liuzg

liuzg

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

W/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talesin Darkbriar
Please feel free to be specific.
This topic does not seek to address the fact that some people complain period.
Well,dont think it would work,dont forget the motto of the game at the start is "No Monthly Fees".

Rieselle

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: May 2005

Melbourne, Australia

E/Rt

With regards to raising money...
Why dont they add some generally useless but fluffy services, and make them cheap, so people can use them as "donations" to GW? (like how charities sell pens, stickers, badges, etc.)

I'd pay $5 to be able to send one "suggestion" email to the devs and get a real reply, for instance. Or get access to more hairstyles, more faces, more skin/hair colors.

As for the "making them pay a price to keep jerks out"... well, I'm not really in favour, but why not have "Elitist Bastard Districts", which you have to pay $10 every 4 months or so to be able to access?
I had some trouble figuring out a name for the district - it needs to be derogatory, making it totally clear that these people have paid SOLELY for the privilege of seperating themselves from the unwashed masses :P
"Premium" or "Paid" districts make it seem like those districts are something good that you need to buy. :P

Then again, they're not even adding the RP districts despite the long petition, so who cares?

psychogears

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Jun 2005

Exiles of Azeroth [XWoW]

Mo/Me

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOoooooooooooooo

psychogears

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Jun 2005

Exiles of Azeroth [XWoW]

Mo/Me

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!

drowningfish999

drowningfish999

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: May 2005

Awakened Tempest [aT]

Monthly fees are just gonna pile up the complaints even more. Now people actually have a reason to complain that PvP isn't fair, or farming is too hard or what not. When your not spending money on something, you don't really lose anything except time spent. Once you have to pay, people are gonna demand more and more, and if GW doesn't meet the demands, they're gonna lose more and more players.

liuzg

liuzg

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

W/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by drowningfish999
Monthly fees are just gonna pile up the complaints even more. Now people actually have a reason to complain that PvP isn't fair, or farming is too hard or what not. When your not spending money on something, you don't really lose anything except time spent. Once you have to pay, people are gonna demand more and more, and if GW doesn't meet the demands, they're gonna lose more and more players.
Yes,you cant please everyone,and that goes for the game system itself.......
However,enacting a monthly fees would surely please no one,and piss almost everyone.

silvertemplar

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: May 2005

Me/N

A.Net will firstly have to TOTALLY revamp PvE , essentially you will be paying a monthly fee for the PvP part of the game for it's the only part that will last you longer than 2 months [and even then, it is like paying a monthly fee to play Unreal Tournament...]. They will be forced to raise the level cap, remove instant travel, remove/change the linear mission system into freeform travel. Possibly change the PvE instanced zones effect to somehow include non-grouped players [i.e. throwing at least 2 groups into the same instance , with a moderate respawn system]. Totally redoing the communication system to allow proper trading and auctioning and various other activities. Have to bring back Grinding and Farming, change how armor/items/weapons are traded and generated....goes on and on?

Talesin Darkbriar

Talesin Darkbriar

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2005

California - irrigated desert...

The Myrmidon

E/N

/steers the topic back on subject...

The main idea of charging a monthly fee (as described above) is that it rids the game of many (if not most) of the undesirable people who are not playing Guild Wars to enjoy it, but rather to cause the grief of everyone else present.
Plenty of posts here regarding this. It's common.

In California, we have some really nice parks and they used to be free admission.
After years of people defacing monuments, vandalizing park property and features, and generally making asses of themselves to everyone else's detriment, the parks instituted a entrance fee.

Problem solved.

You see, griefers on a whole don't want to pay a fee to destroy something for everyone else. They'd rather go where its free admission.

Talesin

Talesin Darkbriar

Talesin Darkbriar

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2005

California - irrigated desert...

The Myrmidon

E/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by silvertemplar
A.Net will firstly have to TOTALLY revamp PvE , essentially you will be paying a monthly fee for the PvP part of the game for it's the only part that will last you longer than 2 months [and even then, it is like paying a monthly fee to play Unreal Tournament...]. They will be forced to raise the level cap, remove instant travel, remove/change the linear mission system into freeform travel. Possibly change the PvE instanced zones effect to somehow include non-grouped players [i.e. throwing at least 2 groups into the same instance , with a moderate respawn system]. Totally redoing the communication system to allow proper trading and auctioning and various other activities. Have to bring back Grinding and Farming, change how armor/items/weapons are traded and generated....goes on and on?
Why?
Everything you list is viewed as a negative in any other game.

liuzg

liuzg

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

W/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talesin Darkbriar
/steers the topic back on subject...

The main idea of charging a monthly fee (as described above) is that it rids the game of many (if not most) of the undesirable people who are not playing Guild Wars to enjoy it, but rather to cause the grief of everyone else present.
Plenty of posts here regarding this. It's common.

In California, we have some really nice parks and they used to be free admission.
After years of people defacing monuments, vandalizing park property and features, and generally making asses of themselves to everyone else's detriment, the parks instituted a entrance fee.

Problem solved.

You see, griefers on a whole don't want to pay a fee to destroy something for everyone else. They'd rather go where its free admission.

Talesin
The point is in this case the funds can go to maintenance and prevention, like employing security guards(if there is,to look out for troublemakers and vandals) and repairing and all those stuff.
But how is that going to improve GW in this sense?
How does it help in the virtual damage done as in a lousy community?

GraceAlone

GraceAlone

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: May 2005

Phoenix, AZ

Semper Reformanda [SeRe]

I haven't read through the entire thread, sorry, but here is my 2 cents. If ANet starts charging for the game, then I will no longer play. The entire appel of GW for me was the no monthly fee. Personally I'm of the opinion that I bought the game, why should I have to continue, monthly, to buy the game? But that's just me. Personally it is easier to drop $50 once a year on a game then to spend $20 a month for a total of $240, over the course of a year. So I'm very glad that ANet will never charge

silvertemplar

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: May 2005

Me/N

I've experienced grievers/idiots in subscription games more often than on free games btw. Why? They tend to believe because they are paying they have the RIGHT to be there and do whatever it is they are doing. Secondly, it's harder to get them banned, as it is effectively lost money to the company....

Now if this is only about getting people with access to credit cards to play online, then asking $1 subscription fee would be sufficient wouldnt it? I believe they do it at at plenty of places merely to prove your age or consent of a parent....

That i wouldn't have a problem with, but merely putting up a $15 fee for the sake of eliminating certain types of players sounds rather absurd :P

Swampgirl Inez

Swampgirl Inez

"I love reading trash!"

Join Date: May 2005

Home Again

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talesin Darkbriar

You see, griefers on a whole don't want to pay a fee to destroy something for everyone else. They'd rather go where its free admission.

Talesin
Wrong. Being a griefer and having the money to play have nothing to do with each other. The people who want to play and can afford it will, regardless of their attitude. People who grief in a game aren't like vandals in a public park. The griefers you get in a game think they have a 'right' to be there doing what they do because they pay it. In fact, many of the griefers I've seen or heard of don't think they are griefing. Stupid kids in a public park know they are doing wrong.... usually.

I'll say it again. I played a paying game. We had just as many griefers there as here. Those griefers were WORSE because they used this arguement... "I pay for this! I can do what I want!" etc, etc. And as someone said above, it was harder to get them banned or reprimanded in any way because the game loses money if they start kicking out paying customers.

silvertemplar

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: May 2005

Me/N

Quote:
Why?
Everything you list is viewed as a negative in any other game.
Not from my perspective, but yes, one of the selling points of GW was the removal of the negative points of MMORPGs ...but those same negative points are currently the only means of increasing the longevity of the game. At this stage i seriously doubt GW created the game with the intention of making you play in PvE fashion longer than 2 months, i'm sure they knew this and probably used the "no-monthly" fee as an additional sales point even though it is the LOGICAL thing to do.

Plus i do not believe GW actually solved the MMORPG-casual-no-grind problem. GW is not going to kill any MMORPG and it basically just became alot more apparant WHY Sony/Blizzard/etc are asking monthly subscriptions and GW not :P

Although this is as close to a "rock-the-MMORPG-boat" as can get at this stage. Anet went for a gap, and i honestly believe they scored already.

Pevil Lihatuh

Pevil Lihatuh

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Apr 2005

Yorkshire, UK

R/Me

Yes some idiots will be removed... but not all idiots are poor or kids that have to ask for their parents cash. There are plenty of people out there old enough and rich enough to play it that are STILL morons.

Many people who are griefers or idiots don't believe they are idiots. That's why they are so idiotic! lol. They are convinced they're right (although some of course do it just to wind you up) and they're not gonna suddenly think 'oh im wrong' because they're paying.

Plus you would drive away many people from teh game. The only reason I play it is because its free; I can't afford to pay for it. Well that and the fact I love it, but I completely refuse to pay to play something I already paid for. You get just as much of a community in games like Sacred or Black and White, and those are free simply because they are primarily singleplayer games.

Not to mention all the threads now about "such adn such skill sucks" or "I want this in the game" or "so and so is so unbalanced" etc. Right now, A.net would be perfectly in the rights to say "Well sorry we can't afford to do anything about it" and all they would get is a few grumbles. Pay for playing the game and immediately if they say that they get "OMFG YOU SUCK! I PAY FOR THIS GAME SO GIVE ME WHAT I DEMAND NOW!". Not to mention that if you are paying they will no doubt have to make extra sure to stop scams, flaming and other abuse, which would mean employing Gamemasters to roam the game constantly and fix bugs/unstick people/take note of bots etc.

And on the banned thing, no matter how nice a company is, if they ban someone they already got the money out of, well so what? They have the money and the community thinks "yay they care". If they can still squeeze some more money out of an idiot for a few months though, its more likely they'll get a temp. ban and we'll all think... "hmm..."

Don't forget even if you charge for it, there will be free servers appear. While its free, there's no need for anyone to crack the software or make an emulator. But start charging... I don't know of a single mmo that charges which doesn't have a free version somewhere on the net. And that will draw people away who stayed despite the charges as well as those who simply can't afford it.

I've played UO and I've played GW, and whilst I love GW, it doesn't have the staying power. Start charging, people feel they have to play very regularly to keep up with their spenditure on it, and will reach the boredom limit much quicker. Right now I can put it down for a month and when I come back I've lost no money and gained some of my enthusiasm back. Charge for it and IF i somehow decide to waste my months fee, I'll be worrying the whole time about wasting that money. I'll feel forced to constantly play it. Either that or I don't pay and the account gets wiped. Yay I get to start all over again.

OneArmedScissor

OneArmedScissor

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jun 2005

currently Texas =[

Court Of The Fallen [CotF]

I will never pay to play a game.
I already spent $50 on the game, and now you want me to pay monthly fees?
No way, Jose

Varcon

Varcon

Academy Page

Join Date: May 2005

London

Divine Awakening

W/E

I bought this game due to the fact there was no monthly fee - I simply couldn't afford the prices most games offered. However I would not consider myself an "idiot" or whatever you want to call them.

Moreover, if the game was paid for, people would feel as though they deserve more, after all, they're paying a lot for it, and so demand, complain and whinge would be on the increase.

It is also not hard to get a group together that is not full of idiots and retards who run in, or spam the map; However I have been in a group with them quite a few times, and many of them have changed their ways after I told them how annoying they actually were.

Kalrakhi

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

I used to play Legend of Mir which is a pay monthly game, I reached lvl 40 (considered high lvl) after power lvling nearly every day. The fact that I paid to play each month made me play the game more, to get my moneys worth and alas, I'm bored of that game. With guild wars, its just a nice little game you can have sat on your pc which allows you to play whenever you want.

Heres an offer for you though, not sure if its being mentioned but if Anet made this game a pay monthly game then the only way to possibly prevent a crisis would be to allow the game to be played offline with Henchmen or by allowing you to do a IP connect game. This is simply because if Anet made the game pay monthly, after a fair few people buying the game with the knowledge it is free (one of the reasons I was lulled in - don't get me wrong I have the money to be able to pay monthly but I wouldnt want to as there have being times were I go 3 weeks without playing) then Anet has changed its contract with the buyer and has technically sold them a duff program. If it could run offline then this would be solved.

Stev0

Stev0

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Apr 2005

Halifax, NS, Canada

From the stories I have heard. People who played SW Galaxies had just as much to complain about as we do but things were even worse with features non-existant, missing and non-functional. They pay and monthly fee. I dont see it getting better for it.

Silmor

Silmor

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Mar 2005

I've seen a similar train of thought for Ragnarok Online. During open beta whiners, idiots, botters, scammers and griefers were rife, and all the 'good' players were sighing and pining for the moment it would finally go live and the requirement to pay would finally rid them of that nonsense. Oh, how much more fun the game would be!

Then it went live (well, it became paid beta), they paid their money, and soon discovered the situation was pretty much unchanged. Conclusion: it ain't going to happen. The only thing a monthly fee adds is people who become that much more vocal about their whining, constantly announcing they're going to leave/cancel subscription, i.e. stack the drama up high. It's not going to filter out idiots, it's not going to filter out whining, it's not going to magically improve things for you.

Sledge

Sledge

Academy Page

Join Date: May 2005

Denver, Co

Doom Brigade

E/Me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slade xTekno
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
~Albert Einstein
The answer is 42

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

I would leave if a monthly fee were charged.

Gerbill

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Apr 2005

The Frozen plains.

The Llanowar Legion [LL]

Me/N

I disagree.. putting on a monthly fee.. won't get away the lamers.
it will only keep away the people who can't afford/be arsed to pay a monthly fee for games.

what bout rich stuck up kids .. I mean.. who says lamers aren't rich kids in real life ?
Lamers being the main problem I'd say.

I for one can't afford a monthly fee, thus I'm forced to play this but I don't complain at all since I love it, sure there are lamers.. but they are everywhere.
being able to afford a monthly fee doesn't mean you're not a lamer

I mean.. lamers can nag like hell.. they'll just nag at their parents heads till they pay the monthly fee.

johnnylange

johnnylange

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: May 2005

USA/Near Chicago

The Divine Darkness <TDDG>

W/Me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talesin Darkbriar
Please feel free to be specific.
This topic does not seek to address the fact that some people complain period.
Just like drinking Sprite won't get you into the NBA... Charging a monthly fee just isn't going to breed intelligence, nor bring you the desired results you're looking for.

Tuna

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2005

Dark Horizons

You can only get away with a monthly fee in a MMORPG, an since Guild Wars isn't a MMO...

Morganas

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: May 2005

I have trouble affording food/rent/tuition with the money I make, the main reason I had to stop playing WoW, a game I liked very much. You wouldn't filter out the kids, you wouldn't filter out the parent parasites. You'd only filter out the people who make their own money, and thus value it, have lots of other more important expenses.

DrSLUGFly

DrSLUGFly

Desert Nomad

Join Date: May 2005

European Server or International

to OP:

You're lucky I don't have enough energy left for Meteor Storm, cuz buddy you'd be getting it right on the noggin! I bought WoW but because of my location I'm unable to play. I have to have an English CD if I want to play on English servers (much UNlike the very flexable guild wars set up) and if I have an English CD the account needs to be purchased from the same country as the CD. I'm an expat in Korea and so this is impossible for me... and I tried... for months I tried... then I found guild wars !!! now I hardly ever sleep

I would never play guild wars again if there was a monthly fee. Not because I'm one of these tard kids who holds grudges and not cuz the 10 to 20 dollars/5 to 10 pounds per month would hurt me, but because it would be impossible for me to set up an account...