A Petition to Stop Bait and Switch Scams
Medion
Ok, my point of view is that; if you get scammed, it's also your own mistake.
Ofcourse there are newbies every day, and some will fall for this. But then, as they still are newbies, they will have about a maximum of 1K to trade. (maybe something more, but you get the point: not very much).
Now if they lose that 1K, in the beginning it will be a big thing. But they also learn out of it that there are scammers and how scammers scam. This means they watch out in general, with who they trade.
Now lets say we get this double-accept thingy. People will stop paying attention to what they trade etc, because they think they can't be scammed anymore. There will always be new ways to scam, this accept-thingy, will only cause that people have the feeling they can't be scammed, while in reality, they can be.
I don't say that the accept-thingy is bad, but only want to show that there might be another disadvantage.
It's ok if you (and Anet) think this should be done, but I don't think it needs to be done. If Anet changes this, I hope they won't put aside the other priorities, which I think are more important.
Ofcourse there are newbies every day, and some will fall for this. But then, as they still are newbies, they will have about a maximum of 1K to trade. (maybe something more, but you get the point: not very much).
Now if they lose that 1K, in the beginning it will be a big thing. But they also learn out of it that there are scammers and how scammers scam. This means they watch out in general, with who they trade.
Now lets say we get this double-accept thingy. People will stop paying attention to what they trade etc, because they think they can't be scammed anymore. There will always be new ways to scam, this accept-thingy, will only cause that people have the feeling they can't be scammed, while in reality, they can be.
I don't say that the accept-thingy is bad, but only want to show that there might be another disadvantage.
It's ok if you (and Anet) think this should be done, but I don't think it needs to be done. If Anet changes this, I hope they won't put aside the other priorities, which I think are more important.
Damon Windwalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartdude
IMO thats the same type of arrogant statment a scammer would make :/
|
Damon Windwalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrubs Can Die
Really its quite simple. You just need to get a brain. It's not the scammer's fault you're a stupid retard that can't think of mousing over the item(s) involved again to make sure they are the same as what was offered before.
|
Scrubs Can Die
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damon Windwalker
Now now...no need to be insulting about it. I agree with the basics of what you're saying - but just because someone doesn't take the precautions to protect themselves doesn't mean that scamming them is right...
|
ozz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Meh, I've already explained that I don't think some extra security will slow down the production for Chapter 2!
Hell, if you feel that strongly about "wasting" developers time, tell them "No more Holiday surprises!" (which would be a shame). If Anet can't fix the problem, that's fine. I just wanted to suggest a fix, since i think one is necessary (not to help me, I'm not planning on getting scammed again!), but to help the next guy! If my 16,000 loss helps out a fellow GWer, it's worth the price. |
Scrubs Can Die
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Meh, I've already explained that I don't think some extra security will slow down the production for Chapter 2!
|
ozz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartdude
IMO thats the same type of arrogant statment a scammer would make :/
|
Yes the majority opinion in this thread is that you guys did not exercise any proper care during your transaction. Just because you chose to be scammed by not paying attention to the trade does not suddenly make everyone who disents to your and Kai's opinion a scammer.
I am certain enough recommendations have been presented and enough information regarding how to trade effectively that anyone new to GW will be well aware of what not to do.
darkdragon99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrubs Can Die
Of course it's not right. It's a stupid idea however, to try and use a petition, especially one thats online, to try and change something that Arena.Net can't change. A.Net can't increase the average intelligence of Guild Wars players unfortunately. I would be glad to play with people that had more intelligence than your average piece of paper, but that would mean making a game of my own and only allowing intelligent people to play.
|
If your mother steped out side today and got shot would you. A. blame her for being there or B. blame the guy who did it or C. demand something was done about it. I don't know about you but everyone i know would answer C
what you are saying is it's all the vitims fault so screw them thats is overly bullshit and you know it.
Damon Windwalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkdragon99
what you are saying is it's all the vitims fault so screw them thats is overly bullshit and you know it.
|
Think about it this way (if you have the cognitive capacity to do so):
Phishing schemes are huge right now - some estimates (my wife works for the disputes department for a large credit card company) are as high as $90-100 MILLION per year that people lose because of phishing schemes. An article I read yesterday estimates that 70% of all internet users get these emails, and 70% that receive them actually give up their info.
Now anyone with any common sense should know that if you get an email supposedly from your credit card company, saying that they need you te verify your name, address, account number, social security number, date of birth, mother's maiden name, etc. that something is ... well ... fishy about that.
The credit card company has warned all it's members that it would never request any sensitive information by email. There are warnings about it on the news all the time. Yet you still click the link and give them all that information.
Who's fault is that? The credit card company? The government? Your ISP? There *might* be things that each of them could do to prevent it, but probably not - who has the ultimate responsibility for clicking that link?
A lot of people for the past several years have known about the Nigerian E-mail scams. They have been all over the news. Anyone with any common sense should know not to give their bank account information and access codes to anyone - especially to someone they don't know in another country. Yet the FBI estimates that about a half a million dollars per year. Who's fault is that - the government? Your ISP? Your bank? In the end - it's your fault for not protecting yourself.
Everyone knows that scams are not right - in fact, in real life, they are illegal. Yet, again, the only way to get rid of them completely is for people to pay attention to what they are doing. in the game is no different. And just because you think that everyone who says "pay attention and protect yourself" makes them a scammer - believe it or not, it actually means that they realize that no matter what precautions are taken by the makers of the game, by law enforcement, by banks and credit card companies, or by the covernment - people are going to keep trying to scam others until they can't make money at it anymore - and the only way to keep that from happening is if the common person/consumer pays attention to what they are doing, and takes the responsibility to protect themselves.
Scrubs Can Die
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkdragon99
what you are saying is it's all the vitims fault so screw them thats is overly bullshit and you know it.
|
Quote:
Of course it's not right. It's a... |
koj11
I can't believe this thread is still going (yes, I know I'm adding to it now). This whole thing can be summed up with one word. WAAAAAAA! Ok, it's not really a word, but you get the point. This is like rear ending someone and saying it was their fault for slamming on their brakes...nooooooo...you should not be tailgating, or speeding, or whatever. There comes a time when you must take responsibilty for yourself and not blame others for your misfortune. The lack of maturity, reason, and plain old common sense (which is definately not common at all) here is staggering. Time to stop expecting to be coddled.
darkdragon99
what you don't understand is that i know those things what i'm saying is your rubbing that fact in their face it's it's total BS .
i'm a believer that this world is filled with morons but it's not just the ppl who fall for it. it the ppl who do it and it's also the ppl who wont do anything to help.
i have found that 99.99% of the ppl on this planet are stupid but if you tryed workin together it wouldn't be so bad. but no what you hear out of the heartless ashats that are you guys you should have been more careful now shut up and get a brain .
i'm gonna laugh when you find yourself in their shoes and find that there isn't anyone that is even gonna try and help you because this world no longer has a heart.
i'm a believer that this world is filled with morons but it's not just the ppl who fall for it. it the ppl who do it and it's also the ppl who wont do anything to help.
i have found that 99.99% of the ppl on this planet are stupid but if you tryed workin together it wouldn't be so bad. but no what you hear out of the heartless ashats that are you guys you should have been more careful now shut up and get a brain .
i'm gonna laugh when you find yourself in their shoes and find that there isn't anyone that is even gonna try and help you because this world no longer has a heart.
darkdragon99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrubs Can Die
Apparently you have no reading comprehension. You seemed to miss this little line:
But yes, it is the victims fault if they don't have the intelligence to recheck and make sure the item is exactly what was offered. Don't be mad because you got scammed darkdragon99, learn from your mistake, if you can. |
Scrubs Can Die
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkdragon99
what you don't understand is that i know those things what i'm saying is your rubbing that fact in their face it's it's total BS .
i'm a believer that this world is filled with morons but it's not just the ppl who fall for it. it the ppl who do it and it's also the ppl who wont do anything to help. i have found that 99.99% of the ppl on this planet are stupid but if you tryed workin together it wouldn't be so bad. but no what you hear out of the heartless ashats that are you guys you should have been more careful now shut up and get a brain . i'm gonna laugh when you find yourself in their shoes and find that there isn't anyone that is even gonna try and help you because this world no longer has a heart. |
Yakumo
From what I've seen, the 'Accept' button is disabled until both parties have submitted their offer.
If one party decides to modify their offer, the acceptance is cancelled and the 'Accept' button is disabled. The trade window will also inform you that the offer is being modfied.
Once the modified offer is submitted, the offers are displayed and the 'Accept' button is enabled again.
Personally, I think it's fine as it is, there's enough visual clues to alert you that the offer has been modified.
1. The offer by the other party is removed
2. A message is displayed to inform that the offer is being modified
3. You are forced to click 'Accept' again
The system follows the rule that trade can only be finalised when both parties have accepted, which can only occur after both offers have been submitted. The only rule we have to follow is 'check before you accept'. If you have to accept again, then that is a good enough reason for you to check again.
I feel that the use of a 'locked' window (no modification allowed at this point) to be unncessary. If there was a geniune reason for modifying an offer, then that would only be possible if the trade was cancelled and restarted again. This is where I can see this extra step to create more 'hassle'.
As for additional buttons or messages, I've already listed 3 visual clues as examples, and they are either missed or ignored. It wouldn't be long before these new buttons and messages become part of the norm and go in the same way.
There already exist the safeguards necessary, but it would appear that (for whatever reason) they are overlooked or simply not used in the way they should.
If one party decides to modify their offer, the acceptance is cancelled and the 'Accept' button is disabled. The trade window will also inform you that the offer is being modfied.
Once the modified offer is submitted, the offers are displayed and the 'Accept' button is enabled again.
Personally, I think it's fine as it is, there's enough visual clues to alert you that the offer has been modified.
1. The offer by the other party is removed
2. A message is displayed to inform that the offer is being modified
3. You are forced to click 'Accept' again
The system follows the rule that trade can only be finalised when both parties have accepted, which can only occur after both offers have been submitted. The only rule we have to follow is 'check before you accept'. If you have to accept again, then that is a good enough reason for you to check again.
I feel that the use of a 'locked' window (no modification allowed at this point) to be unncessary. If there was a geniune reason for modifying an offer, then that would only be possible if the trade was cancelled and restarted again. This is where I can see this extra step to create more 'hassle'.
As for additional buttons or messages, I've already listed 3 visual clues as examples, and they are either missed or ignored. It wouldn't be long before these new buttons and messages become part of the norm and go in the same way.
There already exist the safeguards necessary, but it would appear that (for whatever reason) they are overlooked or simply not used in the way they should.
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by koj11
I can't believe this thread is still going (yes, I know I'm adding to it now). This whole thing can be summed up with one word. WAAAAAAA! Ok, it's not really a word, but you get the point. This is like rear ending someone and saying it was their fault for slamming on their brakes...nooooooo...you should not be tailgating, or speeding, or whatever. There comes a time when you must take responsibilty for yourself and not blame others for your misfortune. The lack of maturity, reason, and plain old common sense (which is definately not common at all) here is staggering. Time to stop expecting to be coddled.
|
But not for the reason you say.
To me, it's common sense to put some safeguards in place to help people from being scammed. People disagree, that's cool.
But just because you disagree with the idea of some simple safeguards to help prevent bait and switch scams, doesn't mean the idea is stupid!
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakumo
From what I've seen, the 'Accept' button is disabled until both parties have submitted their offer.
If one party decides to modify their offer, the acceptance is cancelled and the 'Accept' button is disabled. The trade window will also inform you that the offer is being modfied. Once the modified offer is submitted, the offers are displayed and the 'Accept' button is enabled again. Personally, I think it's fine as it is, there's enough visual clues to alert you that the offer has been modified. 1. The offer by the other party is removed 2. A message is displayed to inform that the offer is being modified 3. You are forced to click 'Accept' again The system follows the rule that trade can only be finalised when both parties have accepted, which can only occur after both offers have been submitted. The only rule we have to follow is 'check before you accept'. If you have to accept again, then that is a good enough reason for you to check again. I feel that the use of a 'locked' window (no modification allowed at this point) to be unncessary. If there was a geniune reason for modifying an offer, then that would only be possible if the trade was cancelled and restarted again. This is where I can see this extra step to create more 'hassle'. As for additional buttons or messages, I've already listed 3 visual clues as examples, and they are either missed or ignored. It wouldn't be long before these new buttons and messages become part of the norm and go in the same way. There already exist the safeguards necessary, but it would appear that (for whatever reason) they are overlooked or simply not used in the way they should. |
I'll repeat my story because I'm sure people are not reading this whole thread:
I was selling two Black Dye. A player offered me 16 Plat. I opened the trade, saw the 16 Plat, placed my Dyes, and hit accept.
As I was doing that he switched his Plat to Gold. I did not see a warning. I could still hit accept (he did it really fast), so if Accept was greyed out I did not notice.
Obviously, in the future, I won't be so quick to accept.
BUT, after reading other scams and hearing others stories, I realized a "Lock" screen would eliminate the majority of Bait and Switch scams.
For that reason alone, I think it's worth the effort of Anet. Especially with Christmas coming, and a whole bunch of people who are going to be scammed joining the game.
All those hardened vets out there, reach back to your memories, and think about what it was like when you first started playing. Think about how you would feel as a new player being ripped off.
Then vote your conscience.
Damon Windwalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkdragon99
what you don't understand is that i know those things what i'm saying is your rubbing that fact in their face it's it's total BS .
|
Quote:
i'm a believer that this world is filled with morons but it's not just the ppl who fall for it. it the ppl who do it and it's also the ppl who wont do anything to help. |
Quote:
i have found that 99.99% of the ppl on this planet are stupid but if you tryed workin together it wouldn't be so bad. but no what you hear out of the heartless ashats that are you guys you should have been more careful now shut up and get a brain . |
Quote:
i'm gonna laugh when you find yourself in their shoes and find that there isn't anyone that is even gonna try and help you because this world no longer has a heart. |
Look, I've given you real-world examples, and I've given you game-world examples. You refuse to accept that there will always be scammers and scams no matter what anyone does to try to prevent it. You think there's a way to end scams, and there isn't. The only - ONLY- possible way to prevent being scammed is to protect yourself! It's as real in the game world as it is in the real world. It is stupid to think otherwise.
ozz
This entire thread can be summarized thusly:
Bart and Kai were scammed. The trader who scammed them was relying on certain facts about human behavior. In particular, the scammers were hopin that by misdirection, inattention to details, and general malaise they could bait and switch the items and gold traded without Bart and Kai being any the wiser.
This apparently was successful and Kai has admitted he learned a valubale lesson regarding trades and being more careful in the future. Kai thinks Anet/NCSoft should accomodate player inattention and malaise in an effort to protect the player from themselves. It is the majority opinion of this thread that ANet/NCSoft has no clear obligation to do so if the player is unwilling to protect themselves and it is clear no bug is present in the trade system.
Thus, the conclusion of this thread can simply be exercise more caution in the future and be aware of what it is the player is doing. Anything further just does not add constructively to this thread. Instead of focusing on how Anet/NCSoft are liable for player ignorance, suggest methods of avoiding being scammed in the future.
Bart and Kai were scammed. The trader who scammed them was relying on certain facts about human behavior. In particular, the scammers were hopin that by misdirection, inattention to details, and general malaise they could bait and switch the items and gold traded without Bart and Kai being any the wiser.
This apparently was successful and Kai has admitted he learned a valubale lesson regarding trades and being more careful in the future. Kai thinks Anet/NCSoft should accomodate player inattention and malaise in an effort to protect the player from themselves. It is the majority opinion of this thread that ANet/NCSoft has no clear obligation to do so if the player is unwilling to protect themselves and it is clear no bug is present in the trade system.
Thus, the conclusion of this thread can simply be exercise more caution in the future and be aware of what it is the player is doing. Anything further just does not add constructively to this thread. Instead of focusing on how Anet/NCSoft are liable for player ignorance, suggest methods of avoiding being scammed in the future.
Xue Yi Liang
...wait... if you've been victimized by a bait and switch more than once - you've got to take at least some of the blame.
Damon Windwalker
Good example of another scam:
When I was bringing my last character through pre, I noticed that there were always people in the city trying to get black dyes from people. Most common seemed to be the conversational "Hey - does anyone have any black dye? I'll trade an orange for a black..." or offers to buy black for 50 or 100g.
Should ANet be responsible to make sure that someone isn't scamming newbies out of their black dye, too?
When I was bringing my last character through pre, I noticed that there were always people in the city trying to get black dyes from people. Most common seemed to be the conversational "Hey - does anyone have any black dye? I'll trade an orange for a black..." or offers to buy black for 50 or 100g.
Should ANet be responsible to make sure that someone isn't scamming newbies out of their black dye, too?
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damon Windwalker
Good example of another scam:
When I was bringing my last character through pre, I noticed that there were always people in the city trying to get black dyes from people. Most common seemed to be the conversational "Hey - does anyone have any black dye? I'll trade an orange for a black..." or offers to buy black for 50 or 100g. Should ANet be responsible to make sure that someone isn't scamming newbies out of their black dye, too? |
The people "scamming" Black Dye are abusing their knowledge of the game... but so do ALL traders to some extent or another.
The only real solution is to put a Dye Trader in Pre. Since Anet didn't do this, I can only conclude they WANT people to get ripped off!
(BTW, side debate, is it morally wrong to "scam" Black Dye like this? Is it the same crime as a Bait and Switch? IMO, no, because the seller and buyer agreed to the price. A Bait and Switcher offers one thing and provides another, which is obviously fraudulent.)
To make another example, I don't know the price of Gold items to save my life. I've never gotten a "perfect" one, and I've never tried to buy or sell one. If I find a "perfect" Chaos Axe, or whatever is hot, and sell it for 5k, have I been scammed? No, because I got it for more than I could sell it to a Merchant, and could have asked around to find the "correct" price!
On this note, maybe I should try to get some Black Dye in Pre to make up my loss....
nah, I'm not that evil.
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xue Yi Liang
...wait... if you've been victimized by a bait and switch more than once - you've got to take at least some of the blame.
|
Medion
Quote:
Good example of another scam: When I was bringing my last character through pre, I noticed that there were always people in the city trying to get black dyes from people. Most common seemed to be the conversational "Hey - does anyone have any black dye? I'll trade an orange for a black..." or offers to buy black for 50 or 100g. Should ANet be responsible to make sure that someone isn't scamming newbies out of their black dye, too? |
I don't think you should consider this as a scam. This is a totally legal trade, it's not like someone gives 5-10 gold instead of the 50-100 gold.
To the person selling, that black dye obviously was worth only 50-100 gold. Ok, he didn't know about Post-Searing, but he could have asked too.
Now dont start with:
Quote:
i'm gonna laugh when you find yourself in their shoes and find that there isn't anyone that is even gonna try and help you because this world no longer has a heart. |
It's not fun, but in the end, I think you will be happier with your loss of 5-6K and the knowledge about how people scam, and as a result be sure you won't get scammed for that 50-60K later on.
BTW: I saw someone selling ~enslavement stones~ in Lions Arch, for the people who don't know, these are worth about 30gold. This guy is selling them for 60K!!!!
Bartdude
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozz
This entire thread can be summarized thusly:
Bart and Kai were scammed. The trader who scammed them was relying on certain facts about human behavior. In particular, the scammers were hopin that by misdirection, inattention to details, and general malaise they could bait and switch the items and gold traded without Bart and Kai being any the wiser. This apparently was successful and Kai has admitted he learned a valubale lesson regarding trades and being more careful in the future. Kai thinks Anet/NCSoft should accomodate player inattention and malaise in an effort to protect the player from themselves. It is the majority opinion of this thread that ANet/NCSoft has no clear obligation to do so if the player is unwilling to protect themselves and it is clear no bug is present in the trade system. Thus, the conclusion of this thread can simply be exercise more caution in the future and be aware of what it is the player is doing. Anything further just does not add constructively to this thread. Instead of focusing on how Anet/NCSoft are liable for player ignorance, suggest methods of avoiding being scammed in the future. |
koj11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Well, I agree that the "The lack of maturity, reason, and plain old common sense (which is definately not common at all) here is staggering."
But not for the reason you say. To me, it's common sense to put some safeguards in place to help people from being scammed. People disagree, that's cool. But just because you disagree with the idea of some simple safeguards to help prevent bait and switch scams, doesn't mean the idea is stupid! |
I fail to see where I said "the idea is stupid". Actually, I didn't mention the idea of further safeguards at all. But since you brought it up...it is stupid. The safeguards are already in place. Both parties have to submit their offer. Then both parties have to hit accept. It was said that he "didn't notice" the box was grayed out or not. It's not a matter of not noticing. When it's grayed out, you can't click it. The logistics of the situation he is describing are impossible. What happened here is someone accepted a trade for gold when they thought it was for platinum. Whether that was misrepresented to him or not is beside the point now. The bottom line is that the buyer accepted a trade thinking it was something that it wasn't. I'm not saying it was done honestly or that it was right or whatever, but the safeguards are in place already to avoid such situations. People need to stop trying to blame their own lack of judgement, attention, or anything else on others. Take responsibility for your mistake, learn from it, and for God's sake, move on already.
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by koj11
Take responsibility for your mistake, learn from it, and for God's sake, move on already.
|
CKaz
It's obvious there's a hole and that scammers would rather it remain
/signed
also auction house /signed, I can't tell you how many times I gave up trying to sell something and finally merchant it/give it away/whatever, and minutes later I see WTB exactly what I ditched/sold.
buy/sell matchups are abysmal in this game
I suppose I've been lucky enough not to be scammed simply because I dont do nearly the trading others do - I'd rather play than have the patience to line up the sale most of the time.
/signed
also auction house /signed, I can't tell you how many times I gave up trying to sell something and finally merchant it/give it away/whatever, and minutes later I see WTB exactly what I ditched/sold.
buy/sell matchups are abysmal in this game
I suppose I've been lucky enough not to be scammed simply because I dont do nearly the trading others do - I'd rather play than have the patience to line up the sale most of the time.
Mordakai
Honestly, with all the scams out there, I would recommend NOT trading until the implementation of an auction house or something simliar.
Most things can be bought and sold at merchants (how I wish I had done this with my Black Dye - my greed for 2 extra thousand cost me!)
If you have to buy/sell Gold and Green weapons: Good luck! And Buyer beware!
Most things can be bought and sold at merchants (how I wish I had done this with my Black Dye - my greed for 2 extra thousand cost me!)
If you have to buy/sell Gold and Green weapons: Good luck! And Buyer beware!
Damon Windwalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by CKaz
also auction house /signed, I can't tell you how many times I gave up trying to sell something and finally merchant it/give it away/whatever, and minutes later I see WTB exactly what I ditched/sold.
buy/sell matchups are abysmal in this game I suppose I've been lucky enough not to be scammed simply because I dont do nearly the trading others do - I'd rather play than have the patience to line up the sale most of the time. |
The only things I've spent any time selling were greens...the only things I ever seem to buy are when I randomly happen to see something interesting when I'm waiting for a party to form up....
Barry Bethell
I've never been scammed myself and of course if your careful it'll never happen, but what's wrong with more security for trading, the extra 'locked' screen would take an extra 1-2 seconds in a trade, new players especially are vulnerable to this and why cant we make the game a better place for all?
/signed
ps. just because someone got scammed doesn't make them 'stupid' 'lazy' and 'dumb' like some less forgiving people are suggesting in here, sure it's careless but that doesn't mean we should ignore the scum bags who scam honest players every day, some people attitude towards this topic astounds me tbh.
/signed
ps. just because someone got scammed doesn't make them 'stupid' 'lazy' and 'dumb' like some less forgiving people are suggesting in here, sure it's careless but that doesn't mean we should ignore the scum bags who scam honest players every day, some people attitude towards this topic astounds me tbh.
PieXags
Seriously, this isn't going anywhere. As much as I'd love to sift through pages more of "It's your fault" and "You must be a scammer", I'm going to have to say it's closing time for this thread. This isn't a "How many times have I been scammed, and was it my fault?" section.
When either side modifies a trade, the other person's "Accept" deactivates incase they're about to click the button. Bait/Switch should not be an issue with trades. You both have to click "submit offer" so both trades have been submitted/modified, and you both have to click accept allowing for plenty of time and oppurtunity to check over the trade before hitting the final "accept" button.
Closed.
When either side modifies a trade, the other person's "Accept" deactivates incase they're about to click the button. Bait/Switch should not be an issue with trades. You both have to click "submit offer" so both trades have been submitted/modified, and you both have to click accept allowing for plenty of time and oppurtunity to check over the trade before hitting the final "accept" button.
Closed.