What is more important to you in a team: Aptitude or Attitude?
5 pages • Page 4
M
I totally prefer polite newbies than jerks ''elitists pro's''.
Sometimes when i see pugs saying ''glf more for x thing NO NOOBS PLZ!'' or something similar i dont ever join them, even if they invite me i don't accept. I never liked that kind of ''elitist pro's'' that thinks that everyone are noobs except themselfs.
Sometimes when i see pugs saying ''glf more for x thing NO NOOBS PLZ!'' or something similar i dont ever join them, even if they invite me i don't accept. I never liked that kind of ''elitist pro's'' that thinks that everyone are noobs except themselfs.
f
I'd prefer to party with friendly people regardless of experience in PvE. PvP is essentially similar, but every now and then I team up with someone who seems like an elitist idiot and put up with it.
Oddly enough, I had quite a bit of fun when I met an elitist who actually spent 10 minutes chatting with me about skills before kicking about 15 people for not being good enough, plus kicking other SS'ers in later occurrences as I was around. So it all really depends on the viewpoint really. To all the people who got kicked rather fast, no doubt the elitist was unbearable.
Oddly enough, I had quite a bit of fun when I met an elitist who actually spent 10 minutes chatting with me about skills before kicking about 15 people for not being good enough, plus kicking other SS'ers in later occurrences as I was around. So it all really depends on the viewpoint really. To all the people who got kicked rather fast, no doubt the elitist was unbearable.
I consider myself to be perma-newb even though I've been playing since July 2006. There is always something new for me to learn; hints, tips and quirks that I can can gather from other players who are willing to share.
So who am I going to listen to? The polite, friendly person or the arrogant jerk; obviously the former
Also I play for fun, I'd rather do a mission/quest with a group of friendly people; having a laugh as we go and fail, than with some arrogant arsehole who'll waltz me through it with masters. Fun is the key, if it ain't fun, I ain't playing. I get enough grief at work every day with having to put up with it in the place I come to to relax and destress.
So for me: Attitude every time.
So who am I going to listen to? The polite, friendly person or the arrogant jerk; obviously the former
Also I play for fun, I'd rather do a mission/quest with a group of friendly people; having a laugh as we go and fail, than with some arrogant arsehole who'll waltz me through it with masters. Fun is the key, if it ain't fun, I ain't playing. I get enough grief at work every day with having to put up with it in the place I come to to relax and destress.
So for me: Attitude every time.
k
f
Well guys sometimes you want to do HM missions and most of those are unhenchable. I'd rather have an elitist that is a lot better than the rest of my team but yells at us. Heck dude I don't care if he screams at me I'll just forget him after the mission is done, maybe pm him some hate till he puts me on ignore but thats all.
If I have a newb who just beat the game and wants to do HM and joins my party, hell dude I want someone who can already play. Call me heartless I don't care.
If I have a newb who just beat the game and wants to do HM and joins my party, hell dude I want someone who can already play. Call me heartless I don't care.
D
If im in a talkative mood, attitude hands down, but if i want to get something done aptitude, since i can just close down the chat or not say anything. Even though those stuck up guys rage quit and stuff and curse off a lot, its usually the fastest way to get through, plus it gives you a good laugh since you KNOW its a little nerdy kid who has no life
Freaky, I understand where you are coming from, but I've grouped with both kinds of people for hard mode and found it easier with those who are "noobs" as they are more likely to listen to what I say then an elitist who thinks they know all. "Noobs" are less likely to rush when told not to rush and more likely to be cautious when the "group leader" is cautious.
Now I'm perhaps taking a more realistic view here, than offered by the OP, in that no everyone will always know everything, and while I'm happy to listen to advice even if it is screamed as abuse, I'm also not afraid of speaking up when something someone says is just plain wrong.
Of course the OP's premise is somewhat extreme and the players you come across are not (usually) going to fit into either group. And then there are the cases of those who are both... But we don't talk about them here
Now I'm perhaps taking a more realistic view here, than offered by the OP, in that no everyone will always know everything, and while I'm happy to listen to advice even if it is screamed as abuse, I'm also not afraid of speaking up when something someone says is just plain wrong.
Of course the OP's premise is somewhat extreme and the players you come across are not (usually) going to fit into either group. And then there are the cases of those who are both... But we don't talk about them here

M
f
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lady Lozza
Freaky, I understand where you are coming from, but I've grouped with both kinds of people for hard mode and found it easier with those who are "noobs" as they are more likely to listen to what I say then an elitist who thinks they know all. "Noobs" are less likely to rush when told not to rush and more likely to be cautious when the "group leader" is cautious.
Now I'm perhaps taking a more realistic view here, than offered by the OP, in that no everyone will always know everything, and while I'm happy to listen to advice even if it is screamed as abuse, I'm also not afraid of speaking up when something someone says is just plain wrong. Of course the OP's premise is somewhat extreme and the players you come across are not (usually) going to fit into either group. And then there are the cases of those who are both... But we don't talk about them here ![]() |
P.S. How many bugs did you have to exploit to make that much Malice?
The elitist with the good bar will play their bar, and do it well, and be an ass about it.
The newbie with the crap bar will play their bar, listen to your directions, execute them poorly, and take much more time than necessary.
If you're going to PUG, aptitude for me is a must.
In HA for me, a bunch of r8 jackasses is way better than going with a bunch of r0-r2's that know squat.
You'll either win 5 matches, lose the 6th and get ragequitted on, or you'll lose 6 matches straight. Sure, everyone's attitude is great, but honestly, who cares?
This applies to PvE as well for me.
The newbie with the crap bar will play their bar, listen to your directions, execute them poorly, and take much more time than necessary.
If you're going to PUG, aptitude for me is a must.
In HA for me, a bunch of r8 jackasses is way better than going with a bunch of r0-r2's that know squat.
You'll either win 5 matches, lose the 6th and get ragequitted on, or you'll lose 6 matches straight. Sure, everyone's attitude is great, but honestly, who cares?
This applies to PvE as well for me.
O

they soon shut up.