KSMod 2.0 - UT99 Sound Effects & High Definition Textures + MORE!
headlesshobbs
Does the mod still seem to be having issues? I was just trying this without the sounds and I've been able to do it no problem accept a few snags here and there. I'm going to take a wild guess that it's just my service acting up as I've been having issues with it in general as of late.
Asuka-
I haven't encountered any issues yet...
Jette Antral
Whenever you get around to it, it would be helpful if the executable was designed in a way that allowed texmod to be used with it.
deadman_uk
Does this mod no longer work? What happens now?
MisterB
The latest version of this mod still works exactly as intended. It's really not hard to test. ANet still has not updated the client to stop the "graphics.dll" from launching this mod, so no change is necessary for its function.
Brett Kuntz
I don't think this change is going through, I'll ask tomorrow.
Covah
Texture mod isn't working since todays update....QQ
headlesshobbs
They haven't done anything in the options menu that replaces the need for this, so back to smeary ****y looking textures again.

Ariena Najea
Confirming that the high-res textures no longer work.
ubikuo
This is so sad .... It's a very strange effect see people in towns and outposts in low-res textures after more than an year using KsMod.
I can understand what's behind this update (disabling autoload of graphics.dll) but I hope ANet can implement this high-res feature as a graphic option (as already suggested -> /signed).
I can understand what's behind this update (disabling autoload of graphics.dll) but I hope ANet can implement this high-res feature as a graphic option (as already suggested -> /signed).
T1Cybernetic
Quote:
I don't think this change is going through, I'll ask tomorrow.
|
Brett Kuntz ask's for a guild wars update and Brett Kuntz receives a guild wars update, I think everyone will be asking you to put forward game suggestions from now on

Ivana Hompalot
is it confirmed that last update prevents KSmod from working ? if yes than any eta when this will be compatible again?
Dzjudz
Of course it's confirmed, go in the game and look at other people's armor.
sunec
KSMod still works fine and alright. Only issue now is that you will have to inject the Graphics.dll with a Dll Injector (google) to get it working.
headlesshobbs
Are you sure that's a safe way to do it? I checked and there's a ton of sites which could carry the risk of either malware or keyloggers.
Ivana Hompalot
I'm still at working once I'm home I'll give it a try. Also any .dll file that's not approved by the dev. of this mod I won't touch :P
Ivana Hompalot
still no news about update for this mod huh? could anyone recommend safe download of dll.injector. I looked up on web but seems like most of them come from unknown sources with bad contents.
Ivana Hompalot
nvm above post, I fixed it myself and works, just had to do some research how to do it, w/o injector.
Andrasta
Obrien Xp
So, any guestimate on the updating of the mod to work with the new patch?
End
Quote:
you guys know better then to be using 3rd party programs from sources you don't know about. Either look for a safe method or wait until Kuntz comes up with a viable solution.
|
@Braxton: I do believe thats what flubbers link was intending to show....
Braxton619
Quote:
Kuntz might not update. Now I cannot speak for him...but anet is purposely trying to prevent anything from editing the .dll they do have a reason. It may not be to prevent mods like this. But if it is anets wishes to not have the dll messed with he might just think about respecting their wishes.
@Braxton: I do believe thats what flubbers link was intending to show.... |
End
Bob Slydell
Lmao, I had been using KS Mod for about 2 hours for the first time ever before it just randomly stopped working....
maxxfury
Anet needs to add the option into the game itself if they blocked this :/
headlesshobbs
I got a nice idea that might provoke that. Say we start with a thread for "ugly-ass" armors and make posts with pics of your warrior (or anyone else) with their low res detail. When that gets closed (I'm looking at you mods), we get others around this community in other sites to adopt the same and build up on it till it boils over. Maybe this is the only way they'll ever be encouraged to fix this when it gets around to places like Massively.com and they start comparing details. I'm sure Anet wouldn't feel pleased with being the laughing stock over something as simple as this.
Of course this depends on you guys.... No really, it does.
Of course this depends on you guys.... No really, it does.
JR
Quote:
I got a nice idea that might provoke that. Say we start with a thread for "ugly-ass" armors and make posts with pics of your warrior (or anyone else) with their low res detail. When that gets closed (I'm looking at you mods), we get others around this community in other sites to adopt the same and build up on it till it boils over. Maybe this is the only way they'll ever be encouraged to fix this when it gets around to places like Massively.com and they start comparing details. I'm sure Anet wouldn't feel pleased with being the laughing stock over something as simple as this.
Of course this depends on you guys.... No really, it does. |
MisterB
Quote:
I got a nice idea that might provoke that. Say we start with a thread for "ugly-ass" armors and make posts with pics of your warrior (or anyone else) with their low res detail. When that gets closed (I'm looking at you mods), we get others around this community in other sites to adopt the same and build up on it till it boils over. Maybe this is the only way they'll ever be encouraged to fix this when it gets around to places like Massively.com and they start comparing details. I'm sure Anet wouldn't feel pleased with being the laughing stock over something as simple as this.
Of course this depends on you guys.... No really, it does. |
Or you could post a request on the wiki feedback space.
Owik Gall
We need kuntz intention of action about this before we can figure out a solution. If he doesn't want to update it then we could be on our own and must find other means of implementing the file. Before I try to do anything, though, I'm going to wait and see what kuntz has to say about this and if he wants to fix it or not.
Bob Slydell
Quote:
Counter-proposal: I have another idea. Create a TexMod package with every possible armor and dye combination to substitute all the low-res textures. Report back when you're done.
|
@topic...
Sucks people ruin good stuff with bots, and people just looking to play with enhanced textures "the good guys" have to suffer.
headlesshobbs
Quote:
Counter-proposal: I have another idea. Create a TexMod package with every possible armor and dye combination to substitute all the low-res textures. Report back when you're done.
Or you could post a request on the wiki feedback space. |
As for the wiki, I wonder how often they get back to you on this?
MisterB
Quote:
As for the wiki, I wonder how often they get back to you on this?
|
TexMod is not a legitimate option. You are both correct that proposal was a joke.
Zebideedee
Wish A-net would add a checkbox or drop down option in graphics menu for high res. armours, also higher shadow res. would be nice.
Andrasta
Lexar
That would be nice, but that would require an update. Changing appearance took about 3 or 4 years, pet storage took 2 to 3 years. Better trade channel was... never.
I'd say the request for high res armor would take anywhere from 3 years to infinity, counting from this moment, if we go by previous requests as an indication.
So that's 2013 at the earliest, but it could also be the year 3476. Yay.
They're probably thinking 'you guys will get high res armor in GW2 anyway'.
I'd say the request for high res armor would take anywhere from 3 years to infinity, counting from this moment, if we go by previous requests as an indication.
So that's 2013 at the earliest, but it could also be the year 3476. Yay.
They're probably thinking 'you guys will get high res armor in GW2 anyway'.
OoO Rift OoO
My two cents, use a .dll injector (if they work with GWs).
If you can find a working one, you will still be able to use this mod.
Also, if you go to Gaile Gray's wiki feedback, she was asked if forcing a .dll was against the EULA, and has not yet responded. Her answer could possibly put this mod into the "illegal" section, which is sad because it was a really nice mod.
If you can find a working one, you will still be able to use this mod.
Also, if you go to Gaile Gray's wiki feedback, she was asked if forcing a .dll was against the EULA, and has not yet responded. Her answer could possibly put this mod into the "illegal" section, which is sad because it was a really nice mod.
Brett Kuntz
I am pretty sure this mod still works fine, I don't have GW installed anymore to check it though. DLL injectors take 3 seconds to make so that wont be an issue. I still have the original injector I used for G-Stats.
Ashantara
Now, if only someone could name a safe DLL injector that is 100% secure. ^^
T1Cybernetic
Quote:
Now, if only someone could name a safe DLL injector that is 100% secure. ^^
|
Quote:
Many people recommend this one :: http://blog.cypherjb.com/2009/10/adv...-injector.html I use it with no problems... |
Ashantara
Hmph. Injection did NOT work, armor textures are still blurry.
