So...no GW2 info at PAX. :(
Winterclaw
Ideally they would have done exactly as you said, perhaps delaying their 4th campaign enough in order to effectively work on GW2. They were on a 6 month release scheduel which they could have pushed back to a year. However they didn't decide to do the right thing.
Age
There has just been news about Star Trek Online look in off topic forum.
NiukNiuk
I fear that ncsoft is preventing arenanet from releasing info about gw2...in order not to "interfere" with the "aion hype"
Stuart444
Seriously, this thread is still going on. ALl it is, is a FLAME REGINA thread now ¬_¬
if everyone is so ****ING worked up about this, then here is a suggestion, post the thread link to Regina's talk page, and perhaps to Galies, Linseys and the rest of the Anet team and even the Anet talk page itself (basically anyone official who is on the wiki) and ask one or two of them to post in here and comment on this crap
it's better to actually BRING this to everyone at Anets attention instead of just flaming Regina. Maybe we will get a comment or two from Anet then?
and just as a side note: Flaming, even to Regina, is still flaming and is against the forums rules
if everyone is so ****ING worked up about this, then here is a suggestion, post the thread link to Regina's talk page, and perhaps to Galies, Linseys and the rest of the Anet team and even the Anet talk page itself (basically anyone official who is on the wiki) and ask one or two of them to post in here and comment on this crap
it's better to actually BRING this to everyone at Anets attention instead of just flaming Regina. Maybe we will get a comment or two from Anet then?
and just as a side note: Flaming, even to Regina, is still flaming and is against the forums rules
pumpkin pie
for your information, this is an elite fansite appointed by arena net, they will tell you to post here if you have anything to say.
so....
so....
EPO Bot
They may have nothing new to say we don' t know already: Working on GW2.
Seems like most whiners here want monthly excuses for the game sucking and GW2 not being out yet. And a refund too. If there is anything that makes me hate this community sometimes its the BS about refunds.
Seems like most whiners here want monthly excuses for the game sucking and GW2 not being out yet. And a refund too. If there is anything that makes me hate this community sometimes its the BS about refunds.
Fril Estelin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart444
and just as a side note: Flaming, even to Regina, is still flaming and is against the forums rules
|
Evil_Necro
WARNING!
This thread has gone off-topic! Everyone involved please evacuate! For your health and security.
I am wishing Regina will come then say something about this, if she can say something good to shut us up, then it is a mark of a skillful CR that adopt less-talk, more-work system.
If she won't even come (read: not even aware) to this thread then I don't know what to say.
〜トラ〜
This thread has gone off-topic! Everyone involved please evacuate! For your health and security.
I am wishing Regina will come then say something about this, if she can say something good to shut us up, then it is a mark of a skillful CR that adopt less-talk, more-work system.
If she won't even come (read: not even aware) to this thread then I don't know what to say.
〜トラ〜
Alex Dimitri
First if Anet makes us wait for 2 years (hope not) for GW2 they will need to do something for GW, because people are running out of content (my case, done things multiple times, not so fun)!
Second i don`t have anything against Regina, but my humble opinion is that when u appoint someone to do CR job u need to choose the person who would be involved (perhaps, game fan herself) and not just on firms payroll (without anything to do at the moment) !
Second i don`t have anything against Regina, but my humble opinion is that when u appoint someone to do CR job u need to choose the person who would be involved (perhaps, game fan herself) and not just on firms payroll (without anything to do at the moment) !
Avarre
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart444
if everyone is so ****ING worked up about this, then here is a suggestion, post the thread link to Regina's talk page, and perhaps to Galies, Linseys and the rest of the Anet team and even the Anet talk page itself (basically anyone official who is on the wiki) and ask one or two of them to post in here and comment on this crap
|
Do you think game developers, or worse, the community representatives are some sort of ivory tower monarchs, where we have to knock on the door and politely bring them news from the game? It's their job to keep an eye on their community.
This is been seriously lacking and its a real issue. I agree that ANet should have not mentioned GW2 so early if they have nothing to show, or at least if they can't show stuff, talk. Collect fansite questions and release Q&As like Blizzard does. Do something to make sure fans don't forget you.
Quote:
Flaming, even to Regina, is still flaming and is against the forums rules |
Faer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avarre
Do something to make sure fans don't forget you.
|
Epic conspiracy, but still. Sew not the seeds, lest the madmen bring forth the watering cans.
Nomme Moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Age
There has just been news about Star Trek Online look in off topic forum.
|
Really, so NCsoft showed Aion stuff when it was announced, as did Blizzard with Burning Crusade and Wrath of the Lich King, Sony with Everquest II, and now Cryptic with Star Trek Online.... I think it's easy to say that ANet *really* announced GW2 too soon.
Esan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avarre
They did not set up an official one.
|
Welcome to early 2007.
Gun Pierson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esan
|
The wiki is more of an encyclopedia.
Btw early 2007 lol? The game was released in 2005. A good thing we had the forums. Free forums for Anet but that doesn't seem enough. Now we have to do their communication too. What's next, make the game ourselves and pay Anet for it? Fix the servers ouselves and communicate about it?
The new communication approach is a brain fart.
Take a look at the official Blizzard forums if you wanne know what Avarre is talking about and compare that with the crap you linked.
Sirius-NZ
The battle.net forums are not really anything to be proud of... they get spammed on a regular basis.
Nevertheless...
Nevertheless...
Gun Pierson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius-NZ
The battle.net forums are not really anything to be proud of... they get spammed on a regular basis.
|
DutchSmurf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avarre
Since when it is the community's job to draw ANet's attention to issues? They should be actively monitoring the forums considering they did not set up an official one.
Do you think game developers, or worse, the community representatives are some sort of ivory tower monarchs, where we have to knock on the door and politely bring them news from the game? It's their job to keep an eye on their community. This is been seriously lacking and its a real issue. I agree that ANet should have not mentioned GW2 so early if they have nothing to show, or at least if they can't show stuff, talk. Collect fansite questions and release Q&As like Blizzard does. Do something to make sure fans don't forget you. |
Problem is that everyone is that used to Gaile saying in at least 3 threads a day that Anet cares (in many more words then strictly needed), that they have problems with someone actually doing what she is supposed to do. They miss Gaile posting another +1 and completely forget how upset they all got when she posted another thing without giving any information at all.
I rather have the CM posting when there is actually something to post. Not posting "we care" (read: I did my job and noted the message). To use the cake designer example, what Gaile did was every time she designed a cake (do her job) she told everyone she designed a new cake.
Esan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Pierson
So why are you posting here on Guru?
|
Vaal 84
I've just read through the whole thread hoping that Regina would respond. Which she hasn't. I take the argument that when Gaile was CR guild wars products were being released but both Gaile and Andrew Patrick would get involved in conversations both serious and fun.
The fact that we have no contact on the forums is a shame, and it kind of feel that we're alone in the dark. Until GW2 comes out and we all fork out the cash for it. Then I’m sure someone will be in contact again!
Oh and i think the CR should be elected. By the community. To try to find out what the community wants to know.
The fact that we have no contact on the forums is a shame, and it kind of feel that we're alone in the dark. Until GW2 comes out and we all fork out the cash for it. Then I’m sure someone will be in contact again!
Oh and i think the CR should be elected. By the community. To try to find out what the community wants to know.
Fril Estelin
Quote:
Originally Posted by DutchSmurf
You can hate the wiki as much as you want, it is a far better tool to give information then a forum.
|
I'm wondering if it's an ok tool for Anet because it puts less stress on the CRs, given that there's less trolling (isn't there?). A situation which can change at any moment of course. But it seems to me that it's a stupid move, given how well managed elite fanforums are (and the breadth of experience that they've got).
Quote:
Problem is that everyone is that used to Gaile saying in at least 3 threads a day that Anet cares (in many more words then strictly needed), that they have problems with someone actually doing what she is supposed to do.she designed a cake (do her job) she told everyone she designed a new cake. |
(on the other hand, the topic of CRs and PvP is a totally different beast, I think this message illustrates why they're behaving differently with this part of the community, but I think IMHO that there's a big lack of involvement/commitment there)
Anyway, it seems we're discussing a point of "history" here and it's a matter of perception. But most importantly, it's useless. I'd like Regina to come here and explain to us in a few words WHY information on GW2 is not coming: part of their strategy? They don't want to delay other stuff? It's not entirely ready but we're close to something interesting? They feel it's not the right time because of reasons X, Y and X (notably their competitors, such as Stargate, Startrek, Warhammer, etc.)? NCsoft requested that information be not revealed because of other games? What about the beta's delays? Sure, these are sensible information and people need to be patient, but I'm surprised that a CR doesn't feel like the community is shrinking (or does she?).
Silverblad3
They will give us information when they are ready to do so, giving us information now when it could change as they are developing the game would be frustrating to such a demanding community (and mainly not informed on the development cycle of software, business processes and marketing).
There is going to be an update soon for Guild Wars, August I read with stuff that they have wanted to put in but been unable to do so, I could be wrong as I will wait to see it before I believe it. Just enjoy Guild Wars and be really excited when you do get GWII information, if and when it comes, but it will come when they are ready to share with us. Asking them for such updates is pointless unless you want to hear, we are still working on it, you will love what we are doing but we cannot tell you...
Just Have Fun!!!!!
Be Happy!!!
Play IT!
Silver
There is going to be an update soon for Guild Wars, August I read with stuff that they have wanted to put in but been unable to do so, I could be wrong as I will wait to see it before I believe it. Just enjoy Guild Wars and be really excited when you do get GWII information, if and when it comes, but it will come when they are ready to share with us. Asking them for such updates is pointless unless you want to hear, we are still working on it, you will love what we are doing but we cannot tell you...
Just Have Fun!!!!!
Be Happy!!!
Play IT!
Silver
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esan
Didn't you say just a couple of posts earlier that Guru wasn't the locus of the problem?
|
When I said that, the portion of your post I quoted assumed that most people here just want her on the Guru. I was stating that the Guru isn't the only place she needs to talk with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esan
You don't need a Ph.D. in common sense to see which is better. You must have some other point.
|
I don't mind if Regina only wants to talk through the wiki. Just don't call her a CR.
tasha
Quote:
Originally Posted by DutchSmurf
<snip> For the community->devs part reading is enough. For the devs->community part she has the main site and the wiki. You can hate the wiki as much as you want, it is a far better tool to give information then a forum. Forums win out when it comes to discussing, but there is no need for her to be part of the discussion. She should be monitoring, not directing. <snip>
|
As an example, remember the Hall of Monuments thread? (I'll dig it out later if its important, I'm at work) When everyone was saying how it wasn't what we expected, Gaile responded (not favourably if memory serves) and that in turn made people respond, spelling out how we envisaged that feature playing out. I remember there being 2 sparkling posts which came out of this discussion with our CR manager. The recent dev update has shown that something productive came from that. The point here isn't that monitoring isn't enough when it comes to a community. Discussion breeds ideas, solutions and yes occasionally more problems, but people at least feel progress. The company they have a relationship with becomes more personal and that makes people want to stay and support their next product.
Point here is the second word in her title - Relations. I don't think I've known of any sucessful relationship where one person talked and the other listened 98% of the time. I hope to be proven wrong.
Snow Bunny
Quote:
Originally Posted by DutchSmurf
They are community managers, not representatives. Huge difference there. Her job is to pass information from the community to the devs and the other way around. Neither of those 2 require posting on the forums.
|
Quote:
For the community->devs part reading is enough. For the devs->community part she has the main site and the wiki. You can hate the wiki as much as you want, it is a far better tool to give information then a forum. Forums win out when it comes to discussing, but there is no need for her to be part of the discussion. She should be monitoring, not directing. |
Quote:
I rather have the CM posting when there is actually something to post. |
Too much useless communication is better than no communication at all - within the useless, you'll get the occasional valuable bit of information.
I do apologize Regina, but the server condition this past weekend was pretty bad. I apologize for my rather harsh remarks.
Stuart444
I am not going to badmouth anyone from Anet but tbh, my main complaint is, I wish there was a proper official forum, even if they kept the wiki, it could be linked to from an official forum
imo, it might sort out some problems, by having an official discussion place than the wiki. I love the wiki but I do find forums much easier to look at when posting/reading
imo, it might sort out some problems, by having an official discussion place than the wiki. I love the wiki but I do find forums much easier to look at when posting/reading
Esan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again
Just don't call her a CR.
|
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esan
You'll be happy to learn, then, that Regina's official designation is not "CR". In other unmarketing news, GW is not a CORPG, polymock is not pokemon on steroids, skill is not over time, and Ursan is not a blessing. Sometimes words are just words.
|
pamelf
I think the lack of official forum is actually a huge issue...
Regina seems to be using the wiki as her official forum, which a wiki is not designed to be...
Without an 'official' forum, the only place she can and should be posting is on the fansites sanctioned by anet. If they don't want to develop their own discussion boards then they need to at lease USE the ones that have been developed by the people who love this game enough to dedicate the time to them.
Regina seems to be using the wiki as her official forum, which a wiki is not designed to be...
Without an 'official' forum, the only place she can and should be posting is on the fansites sanctioned by anet. If they don't want to develop their own discussion boards then they need to at lease USE the ones that have been developed by the people who love this game enough to dedicate the time to them.
Sirius-NZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Anyway, it seems we're discussing a point of "history" here and it's a matter of perception. But most importantly, it's useless. I'd like Regina to come here and explain to us in a few words WHY information on GW2 is not coming: part of their strategy? They don't want to delay other stuff? It's not entirely ready but we're close to something interesting? They feel it's not the right time because of reasons X, Y and X (notably their competitors, such as Stargate, Startrek, Warhammer, etc.)? NCsoft requested that information be not revealed because of other games?
|
Red Sonya
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSephir
Complaining about bad CR makes AN give even worse CR. O right, good logic right there.
|
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Sonya
I don't know why people seem to think Anet or NCsoft owes them something just because they bought GWs lol. Now that's the silly logic of all right there. lol
|
Winterclaw
Are we sure we want ANet to do that right now though? While I think there should be good two-way communication, the sooner the better, a month or two back there was a huge discussion about how ANet lost its vision and merely followed the will of the majority.
Maybe Anet should also focus on rediscovring the vision that got it started as well. What good it is if they listen to all the whiners on the forums and call that CR?
Maybe Anet should also focus on rediscovring the vision that got it started as well. What good it is if they listen to all the whiners on the forums and call that CR?
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterclaw
Are we sure we want ANet to do that right now though? While I think there should be good two-way communication, the sooner the better, a month or two back there was a huge discussion about how ANet lost its vision and merely followed the will of the majority.
Maybe Anet should also focus on rediscovring the vision that got it started as well. What good it is if they listen to all the whiners on the forums and call that CR? |
The way PvE has changed has been controversial because it's been severely dumbed down. But more importantly in my view, it has not been for the majority player. If that were true then I would be a bit more sympathetic, but no less spiteful.
However, more than anything else, many would consider this lack of communication to be part of Guild Wars' overall decline.
Winterclaw
Well how do you keep in mind the casual silent majority if they don't squeak enough to be noticed? I can't think of many companies that did that well. That's why declines happen; they only listen to the people that are speaking and not getting everyone to speak.
I agree that PvE has been dumbed down, but I don't see or hear Anet doing anything about it or even taking note of our concerns... oh wait.
Anyways I can't tell if the lack of communication is a contributing part of the decline or only a sign of what's gone wrong with Anet.
I agree that PvE has been dumbed down, but I don't see or hear Anet doing anything about it or even taking note of our concerns... oh wait.
Anyways I can't tell if the lack of communication is a contributing part of the decline or only a sign of what's gone wrong with Anet.
Fril Estelin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esan
You'll be happy to learn, then, that Regina's official designation is not "CR".
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pamelf
Regina seems to be using the wiki as her official forum, which a wiki is not designed to be...
Without an 'official' forum, the only place she can and should be posting is on the fansites sanctioned by anet. If they don't want to develop their own discussion boards then they need to at lease USE the ones that have been developed by the people who love this game enough to dedicate the time to them. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius-NZ
She already covered this once or twice... things change too much to be able to reveal anything concrete. And people get pissy when you announce something then backtrack, which I agree with all too well...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Sonya
But if you happen to notice it IS the logic that is in the works right now. I don't know why people seem to think Anet or NCsoft owes them something just because they bought GWs lol. Now that's the silly logic of all right there. lol
|
Shakti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Sonya
But if you happen to notice it IS the logic that is in the works right now. I don't know why people seem to think Anet or NCsoft owes them something just because they bought GWs lol. Now that's the silly logic of all right there. lol
|
Sorry but I have been extremely disappointed in the "new" (3 months+ is plenty of time to settle in) CR or CM or whatever anyone wants to call the title. From the recent lag and mAT issues, to the hacking outbreak etc, she either hasn't responded at all or on the rare occasion she does her response is short and uninformative/unresponsive.
Seriously, if this is how Anet is going to communicate with their fanbase I doubt seriously I'm buying GW2. I've been a fan girl since right after Proph release, bought every product, preorder etc. I always liked how Gaile took time to talk/listen. Say what you will be she did relay our thoughts to the devs and vice versa.
Fact is, they've established GURU as a valid forum for communication long since and going waaaaaaaaaaay back. Too late to switch mid stream as it were.
Avarre
Oh, Regina, why did it have to come to this?
I even gave you the perfect opportunity to step up and prove you were the best thing to happen to the community. Instead, you gave some empty PR-speak in a reply to my 'letter'.
Anyways, I'm going to close this fairly soon as we're just going around and saying the same thing at this point. Feel free to go to hi to her on the wiki, I guess.
I even gave you the perfect opportunity to step up and prove you were the best thing to happen to the community. Instead, you gave some empty PR-speak in a reply to my 'letter'.
Anyways, I'm going to close this fairly soon as we're just going around and saying the same thing at this point. Feel free to go to hi to her on the wiki, I guess.
Esan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
I feel it's a lot more interesting in here...
|
And, while they bicker amongst themselves, the real work---collaboration between developers and players to improve the game---goes on on-wiki.
Vaal 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esan
And, while they bicker amongst themselves, the real work---collaboration between developers and players to improve the game---goes on on-wiki.
|
Esan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaal 84
Are you on the wiki pay roll?
|