Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvrod
See this really upsets me Anet! How many different threads have been begging for even the smallest scrap of info? How many of us posters have asked for just a general idea? All the time we're told "oh, no, can't do that. It's all being kept hush-hush for a dramatic statement". Then, as if in afterthought, it's general release timeframe is casually thrown into a FREAKING quarterly report! Thanks Anet, for remembering who your fans are!
|
We need to stop analysing each line of every document all over the world, looking for the smallest, atomic clue about one or two pixel of what GW2 looks like. This level of desperation is slightly annoying (I'm not complaining, you have the right to do so!), but at least we're past the point where people were saying "give me info or I'm leaving" (they now probably left!). Maybe something will change if the number of players drop (not something what we can see, only Anet can) significantly, but since people are still buying units, it seems it's not happening.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faer
Which was deleted, but it's what I always say in these threads, so it should be fairly familiar to everyone by now.
But yes: But wait, let me elaborate. We have been told constantly, time and time again, since 2007 (it's 2009 now, in case anybody missed that), that Guild Wars 2 development was well under way. Good! It's good that you guys are hard at work developing your game. Nobody can truly fault you for that, though they can gripe about how you essentially dropped your current project into a stagnant pool of filth to go work on your mystery project.
Which is, actually, the problem. GW2 is a mystery. A complete and total mystery, outside of some Q&A and a shaky plot that could have been written up in five to ten minutes in some college dorm room. Where is the actual info? Where are the teasers? Where is the development? More importantly, where is the beta that we were told by an ArenaNet employee that we would be seeing late last year?
The beta is nowhere. The info is nowhere. The teasers are nowhere. And, given these facts, as far as the community is concerned, the development is nowhere.
Protip: don't sketch rough ideas on paper, say "HEY THIS SEEMS AWESOME", drop everything you are doing for it, and tell your customers that you are "well under way" in the development process, giving false dates and false hope to try and drive the community to keep buying and playing your products. And don't send your employees to try and calm the raging masses with lies about what you have and have not told us. These forums hold information from practically the day your game was released onward. We know what you said, we know when you said it, and we can find it with a few minutes of forum searching. So please, don't tell us you never said it.
In short: please put up or shut up. NCSoft is saying your product is maybe being announced in 2010/2011. Given the fact that you aren't telling us anything, we're just going to have to listen to them, and hope we're not being set up for disappointment again.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faer
giving false dates and false hope to try and drive the community to keep buying and playing your products.
|
IMHO, this is the mistake many people are making w.r.t. GW2: don't have "hopes", just do what you want and you'll see what happens in 1-2 years time. I agree that the handling of GW2 info was a source of concern, but we're now long past the point where people should get angry. Make a decision but stop constantly trying to get your hopes high or low. You either enjoy playing GW1 or not, but it's impossible, and even dangerous, to ask Anet to correct their mistakes. When GW2 is out, only then we'll be able to say whether this silence was a good or bad decision.
I do have high hopes for GW2, but it's in my pocket for the moment. I'll keep enjoying GW1 for the years to come. People angry at Anet's PR should move on to another game, Runes of Magic, Darkfall, Aion, D3, SC2 (when they're out) or whatever.
It's sometimes amasing that this argument is purely theoretical, and people want to be "right" or "wrong". Even if
Regina came here and said in a very lengthy post "yes we were wrong to put all these info on GW2 so early, yes we should have made clearer our roadmap and explained in a lot of details what we think is a good marketing decision, and no it's not vaporware", people would have still fought for their "interpretation" to be right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seut
Plan A: make GW2 a simple sequel with upgraded technology, Beta in 2008, some Hype through a gaming magazine article, some hints in EotN
this plan is dead, they changed their minds and are now on..
(after NCSoft decided to fire the Garriott Brothers who are responsible for many failures ..coincidence? )
Plan B: make GW2 a much bigger game with new technology and a whole lot more content, some novels bridging the lore coming
The old beta announcement is void. I hope some of the planned lore we know from the magazine article is getting changed. Hell, i hope everything they originally planned for the Hall of Monuments is getting axed.
|
Here is a calm interpretation of the situation, which doesn't put expectations first. Of course the mention here of the team making a "bigger" GW2 is going to call a lot more speculations (what more? bigger HoM? more races? more missions? more story? more pixels? more more more more???? blablabla)
In the end it's about trust that players have in Anet (and
Regina), and there's a long history of bad "trust events" (but much shorter than the history of good "trust events", you know the saying, people only see the trains that are late, not the ones on time). It's subjective so there's no right or wrong. But people should stop quoting the "community" on this matter, not even the Guru community (polls are useless), defend your own point of view (which you may share with friends and guildies) but stop attempting to make it look like the point of view of a majority. The majority of people without hopes for GW2 probably moved on, and they may or may not come back in 1-2 years.