Originally Posted by Than
What do you think would happen if the US occupied Mecca and barred moslims from visiting it?
|

ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Than
What do you think would happen if the US occupied Mecca and barred moslims from visiting it?
|
Synthos
Originally Posted by Cap'n Hoek
Funny, I thought they were there to help people in need.
And anyone with as much bias as Carlin can't tell it like it is. He can only tell it as he perceives it, post-filtration. He can be funny and dead on, but he can also be so far in left field he may as well be in the parking lot. |
Great Gjl
Originally Posted by ManadartheHealer
A fresh new round of oh so fun terrorist attacks
![]() |
DarrenJasper
Originally Posted by Than
What do you think would happen if the US occupied Mecca and barred moslims from visiting it?
|
ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Great Gjl
I think it would be a LOT more than that, since the Islamic extremists have yet to attract mass appeal to their cause even in the face of the Iraq and Afghan war.
|
Keesa
Originally Posted by Great Gjl
I hope you aren't trying to sentimentalise or even commend such policies. The extortion of property only came during the later part of Hitler's reign before the war, anyway and seems more a sidethought he put into action because he could. Jewish properties weren't exactly absorbed by the state, either, but rather ransacked by a hateful public during a state sanctioned pillaging of Jewish properties.
I doubt Hitler was ever a devout Christian. In fact, he regarded it as a threat since it implied a being of greater authority than him. This explains why he created the bastardised Nazi Church. The simple fact is Hitler never mentioned religion as a motivating factor during his speeches, and it would be rather difficult to justify the slaughter of millions upon moral lines. |
Great Gjl
Originally Posted by ManadartheHealer
I think there would be more terrorist attacks because they would be able to recruit more people. When you enrage an entire section of the world by taking something they value (Mecca, etc.), it is bound to stir up MASS anti-US (or whoever else is doing it) sentiment
|
Than
Originally Posted by DarrenJasper
A more valid comparison would be, what if Muslims decided their holy land was actually Dallas, became outraged that it was in the hands of infidels, and cut a bloody swath through the U.S. in order to reclaim it?
|
DarrenJasper
Originally Posted by Than
Not really. That was the land of Jesus. Had been recognized as such from the get go. And was probably THE major pilgramage site for Christians for the time period. Not to mention had been Christian land until the Moslim conquests in the 7th century.
|
Than
Dreamsmith
Akshara
Than
Cap'n Hoek
Originally Posted by Synthos
*sigh* They are helping the people in need. In a culture where we define ourselves by rules and traditions, when that is all taken away suddenly what is left? Self preservation. And naturally this begins to infiringe on other peoples self preservation thus the lack of social structure. Looting of food, harsh protection over territory and goods. Thats when they need the red cross and national guard to come in.
|
Cap'n Hoek
Originally Posted by Akshara
the game is about killing as many other living things as possible.
|
ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Cap'n Hoek
Um, last time i checked, digital bits were not considered life.
![]() |
Tactical-Dillusions
Synthos
Originally Posted by Akshara
Jesus wouldn't play Guild Wars.
![]() |
Eclectic
ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Synthos
If he did hed probably be a monk
![]() Could you imagine playing PVP against Jesus ![]() Hed probably win ![]() |
ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Eclectic
First, someone wants to recruit Christians into a guild where I guess they can pray before going to ambush and kill usually minding-their-own-business monsters and take their stuff, I have no problem with it. Seems an odd thing for Christians to band around but again, no problem.
I do have a couple problems with Christianity and with the current American state of Christianity. The Religious Right (TM), instead of loving everyone and being non-judgmental and turning the other cheek, has become the source of bigotry in our times with their hatred and discrimination against gays in the secular world. They "defend marriage" from people who want to be married while ignoring the fact that evangelicals have a higher divorce rate than the average couple. They are filling the same exact role (and usually using the same religious rhetoric) that the people trying to keep segregation in place and those trying to stop interracial marriage used. The followers of the Prince of Peace go to funerals of people killed for being gay and shout "Fags Burn in Hell" to the grieving family members. These same people are feted and given money from the Bush administration. They are MAINSTREAM, not out in left field Christians now. They've institutionalized bigotry in half their state constitutions, all led by a brazen political objective that had nothing to do with Christianity, but by raising fear of the other and making people feel persecuted when they most decidedly are not. That's the next complaint. Someone got ridiculed in a chat in a game over their Christian themed guild and someone is comparing it to the persecution that caused early Christians like Stephen to be crucified upside-down. When people burn down your church and kill your people, then you are being persecuted. If nobody does anything about it, then you're seeing official persecution. Being flamed in a chat room in a game is so far from being persecuted as to ruin the word's meaning. Try to get some perspective people. Christians run the country. They've got political power. They're using it in a variety of ways that run antithetical to a "Christian nation". I wanted to mention something about the religious aspect of wars that were being argued about. Religion is often used to rally people for a cause, usually by cynical leaders pressing an agenda. The rally against gay marriage to give better electoral chances for Republicans for example. Riled people up in election season sending out pamphlets showing two men kissing and a big "Allowed!" on it and Bible with a big X on it saying "Banned!". Truly I'll have more respect for the Christian church when they don't fall for such imbecilic crap. Where the people arguing for the religious aspect of war have things right is that when it comes to religion, nobody has the provably right answer. When an argument over which religion is right comes along, it cannot be decided, which leads to some form of coercion or force being used to decide the issue. We can argue about whether global warming is real because we can measure and eventually know a real, true, answer. Short of Armageddon and the Second Coming happening we can't do that with religion. So we've got to try to just live together and quit hating each other for what we believe. But I don't believe I'd be remiss in asking that those who profess a belief in loving everyone and turning the other cheek start doing that too. Oh, and a "culture of life" that likes war and supports the death penalty? Whatever. |
GraceAlone
ManadartheHealer
Synthos
Dreamsmith
Akshara
And to your comment about playing a killing type game...hmm...last time I checked we were still allowed to have fun. |
ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Synthos
My gay friend that i mentioned actually finds some of the extreme christian groups to be hillarious. Like he recently showed me a picture of this child holding up a poster on the side of the road proclaiming "Fags Blew up the Space Shuttle!"
|
ManadartheHealer
Originally Posted by Dreamsmith
GTA is a great game, and no more unethical than movies like The Godfather
|
Dreamsmith
Originally Posted by ManadartheHealer
Truly peaceful people have no desire to play violent games.
|
GraceAlone
Synthos
Originally Posted by GraceAlone
Never claimed to be perfect and never will in this life.
|
Cap'n Hoek
Originally Posted by ManadartheHealer
It's about the concept though...
Would you not say Grand Theft Auto is an "immora"l (or "unethical" for the rest of us), even though it is not "real"? The concept behind GTA is horrible ![]() |
Talesin Darkbriar
Big Fat Duck
Nad
Synthos
Originally Posted by Nad
"Believe what I do or you'll go to hell." Yea, makes sence to me. Sorry vast majority of the world, you worship false Gods, have fun burning in the firey bowels of hell.
Note: I was born and raised as a Christian. |
Dreamsmith
Originally Posted by Synthos
Never really got that statement, our imperfections makes us who we are. Without our imperfections what are we? Whordes of minds thinking in the same tune, non deviating; I dont want to be a computer in the afterlife.
|
Synthos
Originally Posted by Dreamsmith
I don't get that statement. Why would two perfect minds think the same tune without deviation? This strikes me as a non-theistic form of monotheism: the belief that there's only one right way, one ideal way, so any perfect mind would be forced along the same path. Nonsense, I say. As the great prophets of Perl intone, TIMTOWTDI! (There Is More Than One Way To Do It!) A perfect mind would not be so constrained, indeed a perfect mind could see the infinite alternatives. Only lesser minds are so constrained.
|
Dreamsmith
Originally Posted by Synthos
Infinite alternatives to what tho? There are no problems in heaven. Im not sure how your chemical driven mind would change in such a way, if its possible i want an upgrade! The concept of heaven is as appealing to me as death, either way you lose everything you know and love, who you are..
|
Talesin Darkbriar