Quote:
Originally Posted by Mourning Air
This was not directed at me, but... the problem is that you throw around the word "exploit" so much and basically state it as fact, when it has been shown clearly that this is not an exploit. Read my last post before this. You can believe the build is overpowered if you'd like, but it's not an exploit.
Things that are unintended are not automatically exploits. I'm sure the devs never intended "taxi" services to spring up and run people almost anywhere in the game, but would it be accurate to say that is an exploit? Of course not.
Again, exploits invlove "exploiting" actual bugs in the game, not simply using what's available in the game in an unexpected way. The old Elona Reach timer bug is an example of an exploit.
|
I can believe its overpowered? You'll let me believe that? wow, how kind of you. Go directly to hell do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars. I'll believe as I damn well please, the skill is being abused, and I believe that makes it an exploit. If your definition of exploit and mine do no jive, oh well. As I told Mimi, the only thing we can do is wait untill the update to see what the frog meant about 'those who seem invincible". Then we'll know that the devs intended. Untill then I'm going to continute to believe that its abused. Play all the word games you want, broken/unbalanced/exploited whatever. Its not correct, imho. I cannot make myself believe that the devs intended monks to solo in UW or anyone else for that matter. How many people have argued that the fact that anet hasnt acted on this means they dont care? Here's a thought, maybe they have been holding off yoinking this build untill they fix some of the other things that are the root cause of the monkroaches, like the group drop rate, or anything else that makes it more profitable to solo as opposed to work with a group. Honestly, could they dare to remove the abillity to solo UW without giving the monkroaches something else profitable to do?? I could just hear the outcry now. All we can do is wait for me to be validated by anet eventually.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endowed Johnson
Elistan, congratulations man!
|
Thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endowed Johnson
As for the guy you said you gave him ample time and opportunity to prove that other characters solo UW (W/R), then ranked right into him not even a page later.
|
What does it matter when I called him on his bullshit? He didnt name a class like you just did, he said anyone who knows what thier doing can solo in UW. As in he knows what hes doing and can solo UW In any class. I highly doubt the latter. As far as giving him enough time. I never mentioned a time limit for him to do so, the reason I 'ranked into him" so soon was that he didnt say, "give me some time." or "i'm working on this build and I'll let ya know". He resorted to "I dont have to prove anything". And while thats true, it sounds an awful lot like "i cant prove anything". Particularly after stating that any class can solo in UW. I might not have ranked into him so soon if he had had any intention of backing his words whatsoever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endowed Johnson
(wtf man, living moment by moment on a bulletin board is kinda a wasted life) for not giving you proof, well, why SHOULD he? So you can start a whole new thread bemoaning the fact that another class can do it?
|
*shrug*, my life to waste man, and I'm not alone in this, the view count/post count says this. As far as why he should give proof, I cant belive I have to explain this to you. He stated that my entire thread was incorrect because every class can solo uw. he said that the fact that "anyone who knows what they are doing" can do this PROVES that I am wrong. The point is, I dont belive that any class can solo UW like monks can, and the proof I have behind that is that there arent necroroaches running around, its monkroaches. If hes going to say that something he says invalidates what I believe, you're damn straight i'm going to require proof. As far as what I would do afterwords, I was quite clear that if he showed me otherwise, that I would come back here and repent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numa Pompilius
To Elistan: give up. You'll never convince the people running 55/105's they're exploiting, but that doesn't really matter. ANet knows about the 55/105 monks, they (must surely) have statistics on the game features so they'll be aware the number of players running the build is skyrocketing, and it's pretty obvious from "frog interviews" that they're looking in to the situation.
The big question isnt IF they'll do something, but WHAT. Will they nerf protective bond to make monks more on par with other classes wrt soloing, or will they scatter more disenchanting mobs to make all enchantments less useful?
I hope the former but suspect the latter.
|
I appreciate the advice Numa, but my intention was never to change anyone's point of view on this. I knew from the start that such would not be possible. It is interesting how many take such great offense at my opinions. Its also interesting the 7 or 8 different flames that keep getting used on me in some kind of effort to change what I believe untill it jives with what they feel is acceptable. Its further interesting to me to watch half of them try to put words in my mouth so that they can fit my thinking into some preconcieved box that they can deal with. Half of them seem to take offense in the sheer fact that I'll not let them shape my thoughts on the issue. To answer someone elses concern, Yea, I state what I belive the issue with prot bond to be as a fact. To me, it is a fact. I shouldnt at this point in time have to state every sentance that this is all purely what I believe. Everyone else can love it or leave it. It doesnt matter, My belief does not require the love and admiration of all the monkroaches. Although I will thank those who can let me believe what I will without being insulting about it.