Poll: Should GW1 characters be able to cross over to the GW2?

Jeremy Untouchable

Jeremy Untouchable

Wow Stole my freetime

Join Date: Mar 2006

Arkansas

None

W/E

Here is the reason i posted the poll. There is a huge thread about a "fresh" guildwars. Regardless of the truth or fiction behind that website the thread does raise a very good question. Should we be allowed to bring over our old toons..If and or When there is a second guildwars. As in one that breaks from the current storyline. thanks for voting.

Tiny Biscuit

Tiny Biscuit

Academy Page

Join Date: Jun 2006

E/

No: new game, new rules, new story, new characters.

BSSuperman

BSSuperman

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Oct 2006

Prophets of Dhuum[wii]

W/

No - GW2 should mean new game, not just expansion pack. Fresh start needed.

Jetdoc

Jetdoc

Hell's Protector

Join Date: Jul 2005

The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]

D/A

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSSuperman
No - GW2 should mean new game, not just expansion pack. Fresh start needed.
I agree...I personally would look forward to a fresh start, where everyone starts the game at a level playing-field.

I will enjoy my current GW characters until then, obviously...

Ouchie

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jan 2007

[Leet]

R/

Yes GW2 should allow characters to continue on and help new worlds and places

Odinius

Odinius

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2006

Netherlands

[OBEY]

N/R

No I prefer a new start, but they better give GW1 one hell of a finale

With the current storyline things will never change much, but with a new one things are bound to get way better.

Elyisa Nightsoul

Banned

Join Date: Feb 2007

Italy

Souls Of Divinity - [SoD]

E/

ABSOLUTELY NO

Gw2 is a new game. Fresh start. Everyone, i repeat, everyone, at the same level. Don't care about my armors, weapons... They are pixels and i've enjoyed this game till now. No need to bring all my things upon Gw2

Drop of Fear

Drop of Fear

Forge Runner

Join Date: Nov 2006

W/

name reserved, nothing more

Alfrond

Alfrond

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Jun 2006

The United States

Boston Guild [BG]

Mo/Me

This is a rather tricky issue. On one side I understand that from a lore stand point, importing characters might not make sence. Also, I get the idea that a fresh start is kinda neat. However, I would personally feel rather upset that all my accomplishments in GW1 were all for naught. Of course, I realize that due to the fact that we were just playing a game those accomplishments don't really matter anyway, but this news about GW2 really makes me think about whether many players (including myself) put too much time and effort into Guild Wars. What good was it to work on those titles or that fancy armor if it's all gonna go away in the end? Even if GW2 allows importing, this whole issue just makes me wonder that maybe we're just wasting our time.

Etta

Etta

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jun 2006

Mancland, British Empire

I voted for a fresh start, but if you can keep the Lastname that would be nice.

Alleji

Alleji

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2006

It's a new game.

Doesn't matter how much you're attached to your characters and your accomplishments, they aren't supposed to transfer from one game to the other. I quit GW and I picked up WoW, but as much as I want to /tiger people, I can't do that. I can't /tiger people IRL either. Why? Because GW is seperate from either of those and what you attained in GW will not follow you around for the rest of your life.

Raxxman

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Dec 2005

TEOC

W/N

everythings all for naught eventually.

However I personally don't see a reason for a Guild Wars 2 anyhow. Guild Wars has shown itself to be fairly robust in accepting upgrades. From what I can see Nightfall has been a commercial success, showing that episodic concept works.

I just don't feel something that is constantly evolving actually has a need for a number two slapped onto it. Maybe if it was to try something truly revolutionary If that was the case then I'd say no to character cross overs.

However unless its really really going to differ from Guild Wars, why bother? And if it's that different why call it Guild Wars 2?

Rambling over. I answered the question... kinda.

Jeremy Untouchable

Jeremy Untouchable

Wow Stole my freetime

Join Date: Mar 2006

Arkansas

None

W/E

personally i voted for a fresh start, but i'm planning to get in early enough to get the names i want ....And yeah, i do spend too much time playing guildwars...lol

Darcy

Darcy

Never Too Old

Join Date: Jul 2006

Rhode Island where there are no GW contests

Order of First

W/R

I took the last choice.

Based on the game we have now and the level of interaction ArenaNet has with GW fans, I will be interested in any new RPG-style game ArenaNet puts out, with or without my current characters.

For the first time since paper D&D, I am a game company fan.

viper008

Banned

Join Date: May 2005

Yes they should, It's a bit early to start worrying about this till we get more concrete info than what came out yesterday.

Dana Hawkeye

Dana Hawkeye

Academy Page

Join Date: Jul 2006

Scouts of Tyria [SoT]

R/

Guild Wars II should let you have the 'Option' of being able to bring over any existing characters from Guild Wars.

I dont mind if they reduce your XP level, take away armour, weapons, gold etc, as long as the basic character can 'come across'.

On that note, Neverwinter Nights and NWN 2 let you 'import' your original characters across as do a few other games. I think in NWN 2, they reduced your XP level slightly to balance your entry into the game. All your gold, armour and weapons 'disappeared' (stolen whilst asleep if i remember correctly) until later in the story when you 're-found' them at the approriate XP level and area of the game. This could easily be done by some sort of quest (See already a quest devised for GW2).

I like my characters and have invested a lot of time in them, not including the next 2 year's worth of Guild Wars. I would hate to throw them on the 'scrap heap' after 4/5 years.

By allowing us the option of importing 'old characters', ANET would at least ensure a core player-base, reward its loyal players and reduce the 'rage-quit and whinge' factor.

Another thing to consider is:- If ANET 'announces' soon that in 2 years time Guild Wars will be replaced by Guild Wars 2 and the above character importation is 'not allowed', I can see a lot of Loyal Players 'jumping ship', because to carry on might be considered as 'pointless' and that they may as well go and play 'another game'.

PS: One other thing people may have not considered is the possible 'break up of the Guilds'. Not ALL Guild Members will buy GW2.

mqstout

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: May 2005

Pittsburgh

No, because there should be no GW2 at least for a long while.

Ferret

Ferret

Elite Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005

England

Ferrets Unity of Rogues (FUR)

R/Mo

My main concern is if GW1 will end up being trashed when and if GW2 is released. I have spent a lot of money on all the chapters and character slots and would feel disappointed if GW1 was left to the wayside with the new game.
If that was the case, then i'd definately want to be able to port my characters (but have their title set to zero, as they would mean nothing).
If that wasnt the case and you could still play GW1, then i dont think i'd mind that much if you had to play new characters.

Ferret

Angel Develin

Angel Develin

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Sep 2005

Lions Arch

Minions of Kronos

N/Me

I "Need" my characters in GW2, If i know that they are not welcome there
I stop getting my titles, what's the use of "LDOA" if I start over anyway?

Thermoblaze

Thermoblaze

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Aug 2006

Croatia

New Dragons[NDR]

Mo/

Yes-i need my chars and it would be a lot funnyer and cool

bamm bamm bamm

bamm bamm bamm

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jul 2006

Well I'd like to vote for A B and D, as in, I don't care about any kind of transfer but ideally I'd like to keep at least my primary name (but if not it's no big deal). I wanted to ask the founders whether they would dump progress and opt for innovation or keep things stale for fear of a community backlash, but judging from this thread most people are in agreement*.

*Edit - maybe that was a tad premature. (50% C)

Durik Lakmor

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Sep 2006

Missouri

Pearl of Great Price

R/Mo

If it is an entirely new game, NO!

Not only is it a shouldn't be, it is a probably could not even happen to begin with so don't get your hopes up type of thing anyway.

Having said that, I think names and possibly titles should be able to be transferred (and/or perhaps something like "Descendent of X" title)

thedarkmarine

thedarkmarine

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2006

The option would be nice. Those who don't like it can just not use it.

Case and point: Bulder's Gate II lets you import characters from Bulder's Gate I. There goes your silly new-game-has-to-have-fresh-start argument.

Theus

Jungle Guide

Join Date: May 2005

W/Mo

Yes.It's truly the only reason as to why I play this game.The fact that its:

A.A free Online RPG
B.Chapters/Expansions abounds.

The very fact that I would have to start over without anything on my original account would simply cause me and chances are,a majority of other players to simply not purchase GuildWars 2,and move on to greener pastures.

Chances are a Diablo III or other highend RPG would be out within those 2 years.

Stockholm

Stockholm

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Feb 2006

Censored

Censored

R/

According to RUMORS GW2 will be set hundreds of years in to the futuer from GW so NO, no old men/women trying to beat the new game in wheelchairs

Advent Vista

Pre-Searing Cadet

Join Date: Mar 2007

Yes we should be allowed to take them to the next game.
If it was any other online game i would say no but guild wars 1 could end up being one of the shortest life span online games ever and that is why.

Most online games will go on for years and years before ending yet with GW we are only getting afew before having to start again. Which makes it seem like a waste of time rather then a investment in something we can enjoy for a long time.


I dont see any problems story wise with it aswell, it could simply be a time portal.
The only tricky piece would be the actual character moving between them.

What i was thinking would be that for GW2 they remake all the character models with whatever new graphics they come up with.
Then when you go between the two your character model would change into the GW2 one or GW1.

Now arena net are probably scared of doing this because of all the old armor and items they would also have to convert into new graphics simple solution though is this.
Make it part of the story that time portals can only change humans no items or armor like in the terminator movies. There would be a special vendor like a bank which would keep your items and armor automaticaly so that when you go though you just pick up your amour and your off.

this way arenanet only has to do character models such as the faces not alot of work and players get to keep there characters. It would also balance the game as characters brought over to GW2 would have no money and would only be given starting armor and weapons.

Durik Lakmor

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Sep 2006

Missouri

Pearl of Great Price

R/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedarkmarine
The option would be nice. Those who don't like it can just not use it.

Case and point: Bulder's Gate II lets you import characters from Bulder's Gate I. There goes your silly new-game-has-to-have-fresh-start argument.
With all due respect the DnD line of games like BG and NWN are no where near the monsters that GW is. They stuck to the same base classes with a few new additions and such, and to top it all off they didnt have to cater to a persistant world of over 3 million accounts. It was a single-player game for the most part and the mp parts of the game all have files on local computers NOT a huge database.

It's like saying that copy and pasting a file is the same as translating everything by hand into an entirly new language.

Enchanted Warrior

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/Mo

No, otherwise the elitest snobs have a leg up, and will continue to scam/abuse the new players.

Patrick Smit

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Nov 2006

NiTe

Is it a correct assumption if most people that want the import function would be PvEers?

Jeremy Untouchable

Jeremy Untouchable

Wow Stole my freetime

Join Date: Mar 2006

Arkansas

None

W/E

i dont think that a few people leaving the game is gonna affect Anet, people leave anyway. And i strongly doubt they will just turn off GW1 when 2 comes out..EQ 1 is still kicking along

gsampl4

gsampl4

Academy Page

Join Date: Sep 2005

US, Georgia

LORD

R/Mo

What about an option like this? Your allowed to keep your last name and forced to create a new first name. This scenario would be feasible since so many years have passed. You’re a descendant of your great, great, great grandfather or grandmother who was a hero at the time. Maybe at some point in the game after you have leveled up you can be given a series of quests to search for your ancestry leading to a key that can unlock your storage account. In all likelihood though it would be a totally separate game. Think of EQ and EQ2. No link there.

Alleji

Alleji

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Smit
Is it a correct assumption if most people that want the import function would be PvEers?
Start the poll in the PvP section, or on a PvP board and find out.

My guess would be "yes" and I'd bet 100k against anyone who thinks otherwise.

I'd also bet 100k on the percentage for import function would be higher on GWO.

EPO Bot

EPO Bot

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Aug 2006

Mo/N

Wait: Is everyone already assuming that one "article" was anything resembling truth?

Personally, if there is a GW2 alredy, i think i pass. I've ben gathering skills and points for all my characters over the last year, starting over was not what i counted on when GW promised me a continuing story with endless new chapters.

Dana Hawkeye

Dana Hawkeye

Academy Page

Join Date: Jul 2006

Scouts of Tyria [SoT]

R/

I think some of you are missing the 'big picture' here. Not everyone will transfer across to Guild Wars II, therefore existing Guilds and their Alliances could and probably would break-up. No Guilds = No 'Guild' in Guild Wars.

Warning: An early announcement of a GW2 with NO crossover from GW1 will destroy our existing game.

Observation: If Guild Wars is a streaming game, then why have a Guild Wars II? They can just update the existing one.

Durik Lakmor

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Sep 2006

Missouri

Pearl of Great Price

R/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by EPO Bot
Wait: Is everyone already assuming that one "article" was anything resembling truth?

Personally, if there is a GW2 alredy, i think i pass. I've ben gathering skills and points for all my characters over the last year, starting over was not what i counted on when GW promised me a continuing story with endless new chapters.
If you were promised endless chapters you must be rather new to PC gaming, at least without the possibity of a sequel.

I will say this tho just because a sequel gets made doesnt mean that it'll last longer than the original. (AC/AC2?)

EPO Bot

EPO Bot

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Aug 2006

Mo/N

Exactly.That's what i assumed from the start: Always "Guildwars" with a subtitle, not numbers. Continue to play it untill the net get's EMP'ed by terrorists. You can gradually modernise the engine over time too. Why does anyone need more eyecandy anyway? No one cares about it. I never saw a tread complaining about graphics.

Darcy

Darcy

Never Too Old

Join Date: Jul 2006

Rhode Island where there are no GW contests

Order of First

W/R

@EPO Bot - a new game does not have to mean the death of the old. ANet could keep the current game servers going as long as they make a profit.

Which would mean at least one new chapter a year to generate new income from current players and attract new players who would then buy older chapters.

Inde

Site Contributor

Join Date: Dec 2004

I vote fresh start (it would be a new game) and the ability for existing players to reserve their names. But that's just my opinion

kalebmordannon

kalebmordannon

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Feb 2007

Ost in Edhil

W/

what would be cool is if we could have our old characters as usable heroes. they could have the ghostly appearance like the primeval kings and such. i realize its not easily done, but i can dream. other than that scenario, i think we should get a fresh start.

Coffee Despot

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2005

Game sequels--as opposed to new chapters--should be separate. It's a new game with a new story. I'd like things to be fresh.