Have you been banned for your name?

Chasing Squirrels

Chasing Squirrels

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jan 2008

What if your real life name has dick in it like dick cheney?

lactatemike

lactatemike

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Apr 2006

W/

I got the temp ban back in the day for a ranger named Fake Boobies. Didn't delete or anything, just had to rename. I went with Fake Boobles, but now I'm really thinking Fake Bewbies would have been a better choice if I wanted to push my luck. . .

Yeah, it was (and probably still is) warranted.

And as far as our constitutional rights in the U.S. go: Anyone actually read the revised Patriot Act? Speech has been limited a tad more, too. . .

garethporlest18

garethporlest18

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2006

[HiDe]

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntherblast
What if your real life name has dick in it like dick cheney?
Gotta go with Richard then.

thedarkmarine

thedarkmarine

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntherblast
What if your real life name has dick in it like dick cheney?
http://kotaku.com/5010324/microsoft-...ns-gaywood-ban

Quote:
Originally Posted by lactatemike
And as far as our constitutional rights in the U.S. go: Anyone actually read the revised Patriot Act? Speech has been limited a tad more, too. . .
It is my opinion that too many have too much freedom without honoring responsibility.

Personette

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Feb 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedarkmarine
Er...
I went back to the imdb page and noticed that there was a second comment about the TITLE of the film, which I acknowledged a couple of posts ago.

That doesn't change the fact that the title of the film is a different matter than the content - the title has to be appropriate for general audiences, since it will be seen in advertisements and marquees. That's a much stricter set of regulations. So the conclusion here is actually that the word was deemed acceptable for the general public, without restriction of any kind.

There is nothing on the imdb page about jokes made during the film. According to MPAA ratings, if the word "Focker" were equivalent to the harsh swear word it sounds like, only one use would be permitted during the entire film. Since the joke comes up many, many times we have to assume that the homonym does not count as strong language.

As I pointed out in the same post where I correct my mistake, Meet the Fockers was written up for crude humor - and the ESRB deems crude humor appropriate for ages 10+.

Woop Shotty

Woop Shotty

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Oct 2006

Ruthless Mafia [RM]

Mo/

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSackMaster
Imo, the name name filtering is ridiculous.... I was banned for my warriors original name of S A C K M AS T E R, which apparently is incredible offensive.
Couldn't that mean sack as in ransack?

thedarkmarine

thedarkmarine

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Personette
I went back to the imdb page and noticed that there was a second comment about the TITLE of the film, which I acknowledged a couple of posts ago.
Ah, your post starting with "you try again" didn't contain tone of apology for your massive oversight. Continuing on...

Quote:
That doesn't change the fact that the title of the film is a different matter than the content - the title has to be appropriate for general audiences, since it will be seen in advertisements and marquees. That's a much stricter set of regulations. So the conclusion here is actually that the word was deemed acceptable for the general public, without restriction of any kind.
My point was not the final outcome. My point was a perfectly legitimate word could also be a cause for concern. I'm not pointing out any more than that. As such, the rest of the post is not relevant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woop Shotty
Couldn't that mean sack as in ransack?
As much as "F**king King" could mean a homage to a royalty from a small town in Austria.

Fug the Unwashed

Fug the Unwashed

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2008

E/

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedarkmarine
http://kotaku.com/5010324/microsoft-...ns-gaywood-ban

It is my opinion that too many have too much freedom without honoring responsibility.
The XBox article makes an interesting point, but the example of having a small child see a name that is "sexual" utterly fails if the game is rated T, in which case, said child should not be in the freakin' room. "hey, Hon, we're gonna gank some noobs, it's time for bed."

Too much freedom? Really? Considering that this country has taken a Hue Jass step backwards regarding civil rights and freedom of expression, I wouldn't consider any but the furthest left to make such a comment. Even a certain Grand Old Party is withdrawing from the current administration's polocies on "freedom" or lack thereof.

Responsibility is a great thing as long as you don't become your brother's keeper. You are not in charge of making sure everyone plays to your standards, but to the standards of the game. If those standards are such that crude humor may, in fact, be a part of the game, them you have no right to report some poor schmuck over their name because it makes some minorly distasteful refference to having a fancy for Big Booty Love. Yeah, it's immature...but that's the way it goes.

Personally, I'd thinnk people would be raising more of a ruckas over the trashing clothing being promoted for girls as young as 9 years old. I personally find it more offensive seeing a 12 year old girl walking around with the word "JUICY" printed on her ass. What seems to be OK in public, suddenly becomes an issue if someone wants to name their character Juicy Buns. "Ooooo....offensive, c'mon honey, let's go to the mall and buy you some thong underwear, because it's all the rage in 4th grade this year." Too much frreedom indeed.

Kumu Honua

Kumu Honua

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Feb 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by lactatemike
And as far as our constitutional rights in the U.S. go: Anyone actually read the revised Patriot Act? Speech has been limited a tad more, too. . .
I absolutely hate when people bring up the constitution.

The constitution states that GOVERNMENT cannot do X or Y or Z. It has no bearing on private property whatsoever. If Bob doesn't want you to say "Nazi" in his house for whatever reason and you do so. It's well within his rights to make you leave. You do not have the right to free speech in his house.

The constitution has zero bearing on this discussion whatsoever since there are no governmental agencies involved.

Fug the Unwashed

Fug the Unwashed

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2008

E/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumu Honua
The constitution has zero bearing on this discussion whatsoever since there are no governmental agencies involved.
I have no idea, but will research this: who instituted ESRB ratings? Are they a public or private institution?

toastgodsupreme

toastgodsupreme

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: May 2005

United States

Me/

Ok ok ok... so let's get down to the problems...

1. There are people who are FAR too uptight. These people demand "decency" where ever they look. Regardless of other people's right.

2. There are people who like to name characters in a way that makes them laugh. I can't count how many times I've seen a funny name "Aztew Mowth". I've done it myself as well. It's always a fun feeling being able to log on a character with a dumb name and just have fun.

3. There are companies, who are so afraid of being sued that they'll bend over backwards to appease the people in group 1.


We have become a society of politically correctness. And I am wholly against this. Nowhere, not in the constitution, not in any law, does it say someone has the right to not be offended.

But some people just don't understand that if something is offensive, ignore it. So what if a monk named "Poop Master" just ran by you? Did that just ruin your day?

Why is it so important that you report the person with the name "Krawnik Anelseks"? Trust me, your kid either will, or won't know what it means. If they do know what it means, then there's no point in protecting them. If they don't, they'll find out later, but not because of that name.


The worst part about this is there is another group of people when it comes to online games and offensive names.

4. Assholes. These are the people who will ruin it for everyone else. If you make them mad, and you have a slightly offensive name, or even a name that MIGHT be considered offensive, they will report you. For no other reason than the fact that you made them angry.

The report feature, to some people, has become sort of a "f u!" button.

Fug the Unwashed

Fug the Unwashed

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2008

E/

oh! Oh! Oh! I want an FU button!

There is middle ground if we can find it...comes with a map that states specifically what can and can't be done...little grey area. We need a travel map, but have been handed a globe...bummer.

thedarkmarine

thedarkmarine

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fug the Unwashed
The XBox article makes an interesting point, but the example of having a small child see a name that is "sexual" utterly fails if the game is rated T, in which case, said child should not be in the freakin' room. "hey, Hon, we're gonna gank some noobs, it's time for bed."
AFIK (I don't subscribe to xbl) gamer tags are unique id's, and anyone can see it, no limiting to T and more mature games. Thus, their choice is totally justified. Now, the question is does should T be allowed names that are sexual (both intentionally and unintentionally).

Quote:
Too much freedom? Really? Considering that this country has taken a Hue Jass step backwards regarding civil rights and freedom of expression, I wouldn't consider any but the furthest left to make such a comment. Even a certain Grand Old Party is withdrawing from the current administration's polocies on "freedom" or lack thereof.
Na, I'm not talking political laws, but the general attitude of the population. They want freedom to do everything, but none of the responsibility. Mom's want a beer so they leave kids in the car. Kids want to have fun, or express themselves, so they vandalize other's properties. Those are two extreme examples, but it makes me sick.

Quote:
Responsibility is a great thing as long as you don't become your brother's keeper. You are not in charge of making sure everyone plays to your standards, but to the standards of the game. If those standards are such that crude humor may, in fact, be a part of the game, them you have no right to report some poor schmuck over their name because it makes some minorly distasteful refference to having a fancy for Big Booty Love. Yeah, it's immature...but that's the way it goes.
Yeah, but so far, we've determined that ANet does not want crude humor in their game as far as character names are concerned. Thus, those standards are that crude human may not etc...

Quote:
Personally, I'd thinnk people would be raising more of a ruckas over the trashing clothing being promoted for girls as young as 9 years old. I personally find it more offensive seeing a 12 year old girl walking around with the word "JUICY" printed on her ass. What seems to be OK in public, suddenly becomes an issue if someone wants to name their character Juicy Buns. "Ooooo....offensive, c'mon honey, let's go to the mall and buy you some thong underwear, because it's all the rage in 4th grade this year." Too much frreedom indeed.
You're making an assumption about the people who report to have double standards. Don't you think it's the people with the immature names who will more likely grow up to buy juicy for their crotchfruits?

At toastgodsupreme: That was so biased it wasn't even funny. You forgot all about the normal people (group 5) who report total immature accidents (group 6) with totally inappropriate names. You make it sound like anyone who reports is an anal retentive frood. From what I've seen in these threads, it's usually the ones who have bad names the anal retentive who can't accept anything else other than their brand of humor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fug the Unwashed
There is middle ground if we can find it...comes with a map that states specifically what can and can't be done...little grey area. We need a travel map, but have been handed a globe...bummer.
You can't control semantics by syntax. So far, it's along the lines of "please be appropriate, try and use your brain" but then you get the group 5's crying foul.

greenreaper3

greenreaper3

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Nov 2006

ign: Cytherea of Athens

We Made Mallyx Tap [Out]

R/

had a "bad" name... but didnt get banned for it. it was furing that halloween special thing, where you take on the skills/looks of heros and henchies...


had a chick ranger, and turned into zho...so i made a pvp character named

Zho The Hoe

:P

Bront

Bront

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Feb 2008

Honored Order of Light

W/Me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fug the Unwashed
I have no idea, but will research this: who instituted ESRB ratings? Are they a public or private institution?
Private, not government affiliated, just like the movie review board.

Kumu Honua

Kumu Honua

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Feb 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fug the Unwashed
I have no idea, but will research this: who instituted ESRB ratings? Are they a public or private institution?
ESRB is not governmental. Straight from their own website "About us" section. (Source: http://www.esrb.org/about/)

"The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) is a non-profit, self-regulatory body established in 1994 by the Entertainment Software Association (ESA). ESRB assigns computer and video game content ratings, enforces industry-adopted advertising guidelines and helps ensure responsible online privacy practices for the interactive entertainment software industry."

Fug the Unwashed

Fug the Unwashed

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2008

E/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bront
Private, not government affiliated, just like the movie review board.
yeah, I found out as much...but now I'm interested in the whole process and who makes up the board...I find it inteesting that it takes over $2,000 to have them review a game and that they first review by video clips, then, later, by hiring people to play in trials...If the trials and the video don't match in the "most extreme" content, the manufacturer may be fined...there's a lot more...but I'm in the soup...figure it'll take me a week to get all the questions I have answered.

oracle.delphi

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Apr 2008

ontario, canada

Steel Beasts

E/

But there are some names that are just offensive. Does any oen argue that "I burn black people" is not funny (not my name btw but the first and only name i reported. I wasn't mad at the person, they didn't even talk that i saw i just happened to see them while i was in town (ergo not an "f u" button)
the Fake Boobies and Sackmaster, and others like it is just dumb. Some one in my alliance had a char named "Gone Btchcakes" never got banned that i know of ..

Sirius-NZ

Sirius-NZ

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Oct 2007

Bellevue, WA (I know ... but I moved out of NZ)

Xen of Onslaught

D/

I've never been banned for character names, mainly because I don't attempt to push the limits with them. Potentially offensive character names are funny for all of two hours or so, and when the point of the character is to play it, not to look at its name, it really isn't worth it.

DreamRunner

DreamRunner

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Nov 2006

W/

This is totally out of context, but from the content that Thedarkmarine have posted, I just gotta ask. Are you a socialist? Many points of view you have come up; just seem to come from a very collectivism point of view.

thedarkmarine

thedarkmarine

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2006

No. I just enjoy arguing for the less popular viewpoint.

Zahr Dalsk

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Aug 2007

Canada

I met a guy named Combibo Meus Gallo.

As far as I know he never got banned, and good for him, too.

Alia Stormkiller

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2008

N/R

With a game like this where there are 5 year olds on up playing and with people from all over the world then extra care MUST be taken when you pick a name for your character.

So if you have a name, think about it! Why do you like the name? Is it because it reminds or hints at something vulger, illegal, immoral? Does it have direct or even hints at religious meanings? Does the name make fun at or discriminate against anyone for any reason? If the name is uncommon and you are not sure try doing an internet search on it and find out what it means (this could save you a lot of grief in the end).

Basically, if you think a name is questionable then there will be someone out there who wil take offense to it so just save yourself some grief and dont use it.

Tatile

Tatile

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Sep 2007

Stygian Disciples of Tenebrasus

N/Me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alia Stormkiller
With a game like this where there are 5 year olds on up playing and with people from all over the world then extra care MUST be taken when you pick a name for your character.
There are 5 year olds playing this? Their parents need to be tought about game ratings. 'T' is for 'Teen', nobody under that age limit should be allowed to play, even if they do have supervision. Ratings are there for a reason.

Glib

Glib

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedarkmarine
No. I just enjoy arguing for the less popular viewpoint.
That's what makes you so lovable...in a purely platonic, semi-hypothetical, non-harassing, non-sexual, without suggestive or euphemistic or unseemly language, heterosexual but non-judgemental, pacifistic with pinnings of religous fervor but non-zealot, well intentioned but non wishy-washy, gender neutral, heterogeneous, appropriately contextual way.

That, and your name could be misinterpreted as meaning Black Soldier so in GW you could get whacked with the banstick, because we all know that during WWII Black G.I.s were used for medical experiments and frontline suicide missions...1/4 of me is offended...Unless of course it can be misinterpreted as Black Ocean, in which case I will be offended on environmental grounds Being a rebel in this regard makes me respect you that much more!

Truth be told...I've never been banned or had a bannable name, I just like arguing for peoples right to be stupid. I did recently create a character describing inappropriate language without using any.

Nude Nira

Nude Nira

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jan 2008

inside a tanning bed

It's Raining Fame Hallelujah 【傘回傘】

Me/

Never.

12 chars

Chrono Re delle Ere

Chrono Re delle Ere

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Jul 2006

The Land of Hyrule

[GoE]

W/

Haha had a good laugh reading this thread :P

Anyway, I never got banned for names since I usually choose "epic" names for my toons ( >.>'' ), but I've always been curious about a fact that happened to me: if you type dago in chat the filter will censure it (if you enabled it ofc) and they won't even let me use it as name....what the hell does that mean? I asked around but no one knew anything about this word.... oh and you can't name a toon "Lolita"....but you can have naked babes with big boobies dancing around. Oh well.

Drelias Melaku

Drelias Melaku

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Dec 2006

Avatar by unsolvedenigma.deviantart

Denizens of the Underdark [Nite]

N/Me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju-On
Seriously? It wouldn't worry me in the slightest.

1. Get a sense of humour!
2. Get a life! You really take the time to report people for, in your definition, are inappropriate names?
3. Prudes like you need to take up old school board games, the online world is not for your delicate sensibilities.
4. lmfao....
Hmm, it only takes a moment to /report someone. I know Gattsu... He has a sense of humor, but he is also older than 12. People who report aren't always prudes... Sometimes we just get sick of the immaturity. I also hate when people tell us "get a sense of humor!" because we don't think your immature "Dildo Wielder" names are amusing.

Anyway, I've never had any names banned. The only name I have that is even remotely reportable is Innovindil Felosial, because Innovindil is from a book. I wasn't feeling very creative that day. Beyond that, I think 19 is old enough to understand that crude toilet or sex humor is most often more annoying or childish than it is funny.

The Meth

The Meth

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jan 2007

R/

Anet should just make the default filter level maximum, and anyone who takes it off does so at their own peril. Rather then support time deciding if a name is offensive or not, just send any reporters of names a nice detailed guide of how to turn back on the filter.

Better yet, make the default filter level _everything_. All names and chat from other players are automatically censored, because everyone knows the internet isn't a friendly place.

I have been told I was reported for my name twice, but nothing ever came of it. Really unless your name is over the top almost all the reports are probably out of spite rather then someone actually being offended. Or maybe it is, and the internet is just full of carebears these days.

Personally I find the really stupid ones that are just trying to get attention to be annoying (lols this guy has the word penis in his name lols), but I like the more subtle ones that have a kind of joke behind them.

kratimas

kratimas

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Dec 2005

Order of the Setting Sun

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by I Is Special
So..

->Have you ever been banned for having an inappropriate name?
->What was it? Do you feel your ban was justified?
Nope, I have never been and will never be banned for a character name.

Screensaver91

Screensaver91

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Dec 2007

[PhD]

No, I never have been banned, but I plan to be.

Inger

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Apr 2007

R/Rt

For people saying those who report are immature and can't take jokes, I know a couple of ppl who report... almost for fun. They see a name which could be considered inappropriate and report and get a kick out of the idea that someone could be banned because of it .

I mean that just falls in the same line as griefing in mmos with world PvP. You gain no bonus by killing those lower levels who don't stand a chance against you but some ppl do it anyways for fun.

Personally I've never been banned for an innapropriate name, nor do I ever hope to or intend to be.

Maca

Maca

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Dec 2005

Guardians Of The Stars

Me/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrono Re delle Ere
Haha had a good laugh reading this thread :P

but I've always been curious about a fact that happened to me: if you type dago in chat the filter will censure it (if you enabled it ofc) and they won't even let me use it as name....what the hell does that mean?
Made me curious as well, so I google it and I think this is the reason :

Quote:
Dago is a US ethnic slur for Italians and a UK ethnic slur for Italians and Hispanics.
Also did you know you can't make a toon with letters Jew in it, I really don't know how that would be offending to anyone, but I guess A.net does.

On topic nah never been banned for anything, hope it will stay that way

Plague on a Stick

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jan 2006

Advent To Glory[xAGx]

W/

See Mike Hunt was my monks name lol
I deleted the char but i had him 4 over a year and wasnt banned

Fug the Unwashed

Fug the Unwashed

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2008

E/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drelias Melaku
Hmm, it only takes a moment to /report someone. I know Gattsu... He has a sense of humor, but he is also older than 12. People who report aren't always prudes... Sometimes we just get sick of the immaturity. I also hate when people tell us "get a sense of humor!" because we don't think your immature "Dildo Wielder" names are amusing.

Anyway, I've never had any names banned. The only name I have that is even remotely reportable is Innovindil Felosial, because Innovindil is from a book. I wasn't feeling very creative that day. Beyond that, I think 19 is old enough to understand that crude toilet or sex humor is most often more annoying or childish than it is funny.
Read all through the thread...there are people getting banned for names that are not even remotely sexual or particularly bad "toilet" humor...why is Poo Poo Head bannable? What about Ihava Potty Mouth? Seriously, there are a lot of dumb names that are immature, but are they really something someone needs to report?

I find it annoying that people can say over and over again that some names are not even that bad and they get the banstick...What's wrong with "Wyrmtongue" that it won't even go through the filter? A closed thread ('cause it became a /rant apparently) had a poor confused player with a list of 8 names and no one could figure out which one caused the ban.

Not everyone is getting hammered for Dildo Wielder, which, oddly enough, has been brought up a couple of times in this thread by people against offensive names...why is that name so popular with you people?

Fug the Unwashed

Fug the Unwashed

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2008

E/

Pardon the bump...Look at these Bond Girl names and decide which are bannable....they all made it to television.

Miss Moneypenny (Entire series)
Jinx (Die Another Day)
Miranda Frost (Die Another Day)
Verity (Die Another Day)
Electra King (The World Is Not Enough)
Dr. Christmas Jones (The World Is Not Enough)
Xenia Onatopp (Goldeneye)
May Day (A View To A Kill)
Octopussy (Octopussy)
Penelope Smallbone (Octopussy)
Bibi Dahl (For Your Eyes Only)
Countess Lisl von Shlaf (For Your Eyes Only)
Dr. Holly Goodhead (Moonraker)
Mary Goodnight (The Man With The Golden Gun)
Solitaire (Live And Let Die)
Tiffany Case (Diamonds Are Forever)
Plenty O'Toole (Diamonds Are Forever)
Irma Bunt (On Her Majesty's Secret Service)
Kissy Suzuki (You Only Live Twice)
Fiona Volpe (Thunderball)
Pussy Galore (Goldfinger)
Rosa Klebb (From Russia With Love)
Honey Ryder (Dr. No)

Couldn't resist this. Being the 100th anniverary of the birth of the author of the series. I'm sure he might have something to say about some of what is getting banned. For crying out loud, he died before I was born and his names are as funny now as I'm sure they were then. A respected author and favorite character/series of millions of people, and even if it weren't a copyright issue, a bunch of these would likely get reported by people who are too easily offended and should heed the warning of the T rating...If 13 year olds are playing, there is likely to be immaturity...DUH!

thedarkmarine

thedarkmarine

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2006

Well, those characters were for books and movies, not TV.

Additionally, the Bond movies are explicitly rated for sexuality, in which Guild Wars is not.

Lastly, your opinion about them being funny is not shared by everyone, and saying, "common, it's funny, let it slide," is a very very poor argument.

Kumu Honua

Kumu Honua

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Feb 2008

It doesn't matter what you or I think is bannable. Especially in the list of Bond movies.

All that matters even the slightest is what ANET thinks is bannable.

Just for reference, ever bond girl name you have listed there is bannable. Since it's in direct violation of the EULA.

"You may not select as your Character Name the name of another person, or a name which violates any third party's trademark right, copyright, or other proprietary right, or which may mislead other players to believe you to be an employee of NC Interactive or its affiliated companies, or which NC Interactive deems at its sole discretion to be vulgar or otherwise offensive."

Glib

Glib

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: May 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedarkmarine
Well, those characters were for books and movies, not TV.

Additionally, the Bond movies are explicitly rated for sexuality, in which Guild Wars is not.

Lastly, your opinion about them being funny is not shared by everyone, and saying, "common, it's funny, let it slide," is a very very poor argument.
Fug was just saying that they had made it to television, not that they were made FOR it. He was also just saying they were likely bannable. As for "not shared by everyone"....pfffft...just as weak an arguement (if I were actually making one). Not everyone enjoys tomatoes, so let's quit using them in Ketchup! The minority sometimes just needs to stay the minority and let the majority have its fun...isn't that how elections work? Oh, yeah...the whole delegate/electoral college thing (hmmmm...ANet's role?)

Quote:
It doesn't matter what you or I think is bannable. Especially in the list of Bond movies.

All that matters even the slightest is what ANET thinks is bannable.

Just for reference, ever bond girl name you have listed there is bannable. Since it's in direct violation of the EULA.

"You may not select as your Character Name the name of another person, or a name which violates any third party's trademark right, copyright, or other proprietary right, or which may mislead other players to believe you to be an employee of NC Interactive or its affiliated companies, or which NC Interactive deems at its sole discretion to be vulgar or otherwise offensive."
And it DOES matter what I think is bannable, because I, like everyone else, have the power to use /report...Do you really think I should weild such power?

And saying that all that matters is what ANet thinks would hold more weight with me if the /report issue didn't interfere with my enjoyment of the game. You see, if I am a paying customer who thinks that ANet caters far too much to people who are easily offended in spite of the games rating, whether or not the specifics of character names are mentioned, I may choose to play another game...if many people hold this opinion, then ANet loses money. What the customer thinks of ANet matters. Now, they have to ask themselves if there are more people like me, or more people who might buy another game because some idiot named their character "Itchy Bumwah".

Youu aren't even reading the post? You probably read the first sentence of the chapters and headings and move on...no wonder it only took you 2 hours to read War and Peace! (JK). Seriously, If you reread Fug's post, you will see he mentionded that "if it weren't a copyright issue". You guys are arguing against yourselves. He was actually only saying one thing that was it was interesting, mentioned the author, the T rating of the game and that people arguing for the banning of names that aren't really THAT bad are overly sensitive...thanks for helping out there.

Kumu Honua

Kumu Honua

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Feb 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glib
And it DOES matter what I think is bannable, because I, like everyone else, have the power to use /report...Do you really think I should weild such power?
You don't hold any power whatsoever.

If a player had a name of Tomato (To use your ketchup reference) and you /reported the name. Most likely they would just look at your report and say "This is not offensive, it does not violate any terms of conditions. It will not be banned. However you will receive one for abuse of the /report feature."

If however they somehow agree with you and they ban that name. You still held no power. ANET held the power and wielded it. All you did was shine a spotlight on something that may or may not have needed to be looked at. That is a power you SHOULD have.

Quote:
Youu aren't even reading the post? You probably read the first sentence of the chapters and headings and move on...no wonder it only took you 2 hours to read War and Peace! (JK). Seriously, If you reread Fug's post, you will see he mentionded that "if it weren't a copyright issue". You guys are arguing against yourselves. He was actually only saying one thing that was it was interesting, mentioned the author, the T rating of the game and that people arguing for the banning of names that aren't really THAT bad are overly sensitive...thanks for helping out there.
You are the one not reading posts. He asks a question. Which are bannable? The answer is "All of them."

He then goes on to say his point of view of the answer. Which includes a caveat that he doesn't think they should be bannable names if the EULA wasn't written as it was.

Even if he had said "If it weren't a copyright issue, which of these would be banned" then it would have been a moot point because it is an issue. (Not one of copyright, but one of proprietary rights.) A hypothetical that nullifies part of the truth of the situation is a cop-out argument.