Dev Update: Hall of Monuments Changes

The Red Messenger

The Red Messenger

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Mar 2008

America

cool.

so if im reading this right, each armor set will be displayable as that armor type if you posted it for any character. so...if you got one FoW set and one vabbian, you can display for any class? this will probably get me to buy one of each type of elite armor...spread over all my characters on my account.

Striken7

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Apr 2007

The District Nudists

R/

Finally, a good update that gets back to at least one of the basic principles of GW - encouragement to play and learn multiple characters and professions. Even better, I have absolutely no questions about how it will work, because I read the whole post. As long as they don't change anything they've said here, it's all pretty self-explanatory.

I do wish they would change more of the gold-only titles to account based, the way Lucky and Unlucky are.

Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, Party Animal, Elite Skill Captures. All could easily fit the account-based method.

BenjZee

BenjZee

Forge Runner

Join Date: Dec 2006

The Overacheivers [Club]

Mo/

Lol everyone remember how the HOM was on the sneak peak weekend you had a specific profession and gender for each armor that appeared
i dont think it would be easy if they were to change alot of the titles to account based. kinda like the retrospective achievments.

Scarlett Romanov

Scarlett Romanov

Guest

Join Date: Jul 2005

Me/

I am very pleased! I have new initative to play again. Here I come legendary defender of ascalon! w00t!

WinterSnowblind

WinterSnowblind

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Feb 2007

Fantastic, I haven't been buying armour sets for my other characters soley because I thought it would all be a waste by the time GW2 comes out, and I've been focusing just on the one character, to get him as good as possible, I'm very pleased to see they've been paying attention and have completely fixed this problem.

Thanks.

captain_carter

captain_carter

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Jul 2007

England

The X Viles [TXV]

R/

Regarding GW2 unlocks and exactly how things will work:

Noone knows yet, A-net probably haven't got it worked out yet. Noone can give a truthfully full answer to these questions.


My interpretation regarding the armour:

In character-based mode it will look exactly as it does now.

In account-based mode you will see a monument for each armour added by any character on your account (up to the maximum number that can be displayed), but it will appear as armour for the proffession and sex of the character you are currently looking at it with, and will presumably have the colour of the current armour he/she is wearing.

Gregslot

Gregslot

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Aug 2006

Me/

Quote:
Originally Posted by graverobber2
legendary survivor should be character based
vanquisher can be easily done account based: if one character has vanquished an area, it counts as vanquished for all characters

I think they should do treasure & wisdom title account based aswell
I hate always have to switch to my warrior for identifying golds and not beeing able to use lockpicks/key because i have to save them up for my warrior

here's what i think they should make account based:
  • Drunkard (some ppl use it for their dwarven skills)
  • Treasure Hunter (see above)
  • Wisdom (see above)
  • Sweet Tooth (Some sweets provide a bonus ingame, so every character can use them and they don't have to be saved up for use by a certain character)
  • Party Animal (we already have Drunkard & Sweet tooth, so we can just add this one)
  • Vanquisher (see above)

Should stay character based: (but can ofcourse be added to account-HoM)
  • Survivor (unique for the character, accountbased would be to easy)
  • Legendary Defender Of Ascalon (unique for the character, accountbased would be to easy)
  • Maxed titles (there should be some challenge to gaining r6)
  • Sunspear, Lightbringer, Asura, Deldrimor, Ebon Vanguard, Norn (be honest, these aren't too hard to gain, they just take some time)
  • Master of the North (the vanquished areas DO count accountwide, dungeons, missions and map exploration is characterbased)
  • Protector, Guardian & Legendary Guardian
  • Carthographer
  • Skill Hunter (so that it won't be TOO easy to get elite and to let elite tomes keep their value)

Titles in the account-based list should be added (for example: my warrior has 350 ID's on his wisdom title, my monk has 100 ID's, so the total should be 450)
That's also one of the reasons i didn't add protector & carthographer to the accountbased list => (for example: if someone has completely carthographed an area, it should be available to all character to see it completely, even if they didn't visit that area yet, same for missions)
I would put Skill Hunter and Protector/Guardian at account-wide section. I think it would be much more of an advantage having mutiple-character with all the skills spread out around them than one character with all. Taking my main argument reffering from vanquish "if if capture an elite skill with one character, should the game say 'no you didint captured this skill before therefore you will need to have the same trouble of capturing it again with your other character'?". The game favors you at PvP if you capture one elite skill (and even the normal ones) because you will have acess to it. and to those who will use this to say that you should have elite skills unlocked at PvE: It would ruin the experience of building a chratacer if this happened. There are also many minor points in favor of what i say that we can easly think of (money, time, usefulness).
Now reffering to Protector/Guardian. I will use the same argument as for vanquishing. And also a very plain and simple: to have fun. Having mutiple characters and going for a title, the experience will be far more enjoyable knowing that you can play any role you want to. At least it does sound for me (i have 5 characters i like to play for fun, mesmer, elementalist, warrior, assassin, ritualist and dervish).

Sai Rith

Sai Rith

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jan 2006

W/

I don't quite understand. So if I let's say get Survivor title on any cahracter, that title becomes account based in the HoM?

BenjZee

BenjZee

Forge Runner

Join Date: Dec 2006

The Overacheivers [Club]

Mo/

thats what seems to be right, they were straight to the point about this update aswell .. no confussions

Gregslot

Gregslot

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Aug 2006

Me/

Ahm, i dont quiet understand one thing.
If i buy a Vaabian armor with my mesmer and i log in with my Ritualist, will it display a Vaabian armor for my ritualist (with the ritualist model and etc)?

BladeWind

BladeWind

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Nov 2007

The Ice Wastes in the Underworld.

The Renegades Of Ascalon

E/

Four words.

Your the daddy ANET

captain_carter

captain_carter

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Jul 2007

England

The X Viles [TXV]

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregslot
Ahm, i dont quiet understand one thing.
If i buy a Vaabian armor with my mesmer and i log in with my Ritualist, will it display a Vaabian armor for my ritualist (with the ritualist model and etc)?
That was my interpretation.

Dark-NighT

Dark-NighT

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Dec 2006

Stygian Veil

Shoop Da Woop [Lolz]

N/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain Fz
Did someone mention me? :3
Cant recall <3

Well one of my mates cant stick to just one char, he spends shitloads of money on it, then gets bored and makes a new one but after the update he can share all his stuff in one hall.

BenjZee

BenjZee

Forge Runner

Join Date: Dec 2006

The Overacheivers [Club]

Mo/

yup as simple as that

Tyla

Emo Goth Italics

Join Date: Sep 2006

By the way, I'm a little confused about some of it.

If you have multiple armoursets across multiple characters (e.g Marhan's Grotto armour on your Mesmer in the HoM and Ancient on your Ranger), would it add both the Marhan's Grotto and the Ancient armour in all of your HoM's?

nekopowa

nekopowa

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Dec 2006

Croatia

A/P

I wonder will different titles from different characters count to KoaBD in the account-based mode. If so, no point making anything account-wide since the account-based HoM will count in GW2.

Darksun

Darksun

Jungle Guide

Join Date: May 2005

USA

Karr's Castle

W/E

This is neat, but I have to say..
I'm surprised that after all the stupid little things Guru member complained about in the HoM that people are so excited over this.

This is... really not that big of a deal
I'm glad the general response is positive, but you people are strange..

Ben-A-BoO

Ben-A-BoO

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Aug 2006

Europe

Awesomeness!
Thanks Anet

BenjZee

BenjZee

Forge Runner

Join Date: Dec 2006

The Overacheivers [Club]

Mo/

yes i also doubt they'll change the current titles. Also You may get GWAMM on one character which causes the beacon across the account but it doesnt mean al lthe characters get the title. so if you like the look of titless which i do im still going for KOABD on each one

Yichi

Yichi

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Sep 2005

Guild Hall, Vent, Guesting, PvE, or the occasional HA match...

Dark Alley [dR]

Wow... ANET doing something positive??!!


/awaits fail

Yawgmoth

Yawgmoth

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Apr 2005

While I'm still amazed by the announcement of HoM going account-based, I can't imagine how they will handle the aggregation technically.
First I thought the acc-based HoM would be a separate clean one you would come into or activate and manually put in the achievements you want, coming with any characters you want. This would work with all of the monuments except the minipets one - you can show customized weapons or armors you wear to a fresh new account monument but your minis are already dedicated but not to a specific char or account. And even worse - players often got rid of dedicated minis, so they would have nothing to show. This would require an automatic way of filling the account minis monument, but if a programmer can do that, then changing Treasure Hunter and Wisdom to account-based should be a piece of cake.

Now something to think about: Is the Kind of a Big Deal title going to have any meaning in the account-based HoM, where all achievements can come from different chars?

The title itself doesn't have a statue but it changes the appearance of whole monument, upgrading it in 'ranks' from 0 to 5. But will you be able to bring all those maxed titles from different characters to your HoM to get the effect or you will need at least 1 char with "I Have Many Leather-Bound Books(4)" and fill other monuments however you want to achieve max rank "Honor"?

Tatile

Tatile

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Sep 2007

Stygian Disciples of Tenebrasus

N/Me

I await screenshots. Not as proof mind you, but I want to know how this works before I start fiddling with my Hall.

Nice looking change, thanks guys

P.S. Not cynical, just cautious. Rightfully so?

fowlero

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Jan 2007

England, UK

We Are The One And Only [rR]

I've probably missed it so apologies if i have.

Is this implemented or is it an upcoming?

Another Felldspar

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Sep 2006

Alchemy Incorporated

Mo/E

Incredibly nice!

Thank you A-Net. Thank you very much.

Lord Sojar

Lord Sojar

The Fallen One

Join Date: Dec 2005

Oblivion

Irrelevant

Mo/Me

Oh....a....mai.....a.....ghod....... ANET has been taken over by aliens. This is not the real ANET. We have been deceived.

Jetdoc

Jetdoc

Hell's Protector

Join Date: Jul 2005

The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]

D/A

I wonder how they are going to do the minipet monument...if it will display some mix of the minipets you've already dedicated?

It's honestly the only one I've tried to fill up on more than one character, because it's insanely easy (and cheap) to do so.

Arutima

Arutima

Academy Page

Join Date: Feb 2006

Canada

R/

Thanks anet. Now, make wisdom and treasure hunter account based

kradens

kradens

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Mar 2007

:P guess.

R/

there wouldnt be ANY point of any of the titles remaining character based.

why?

because GW2 will allow u to make all ur new characters reap the benefits from ur HoM.........because it transfers account-to-account.

so single character titles//

dont make any sense.

in light of this accout-to-account thing.


THINK about it.

shoyon456

shoyon456

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

D/

Quote:
Originally Posted by kradens
there wouldnt be ANY point of any of the titles remaining character based.

why?

because GW2 will allow u to make all ur new characters reap the benefits from ur HoM.........because it transfers account-to-account.

so single character titles//

dont make any sense.

in light of this accout-to-account thing.


THINK about it.
You're assuming EVERYONE plans to hop on the gw2 train. This is a great update that provides more incentive for people to do that, however does little for anyone who ends up sticking with the old gw1.

NoXiFy

NoXiFy

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Aug 2007

★☆٭Ńēŵ~ŶờЯК٭☆★

The Benecia Renovatio [RenO]

Mo/Me

cool, add a monument/space for gloves and headpieces and ill be happier. The fact that i payed 75 ecto (when they were 5k each from players -_-) for some gloves that people can now farm for in 3 hours is ridiculus. Give me an accomplishment for gw2 so i dont feel so damn bad.

kradens

kradens

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Mar 2007

:P guess.

R/

id ur planning to stick with gw1.

how does HoM changes affect u at ALL?

Jenn

Jenn

Resigned.

Join Date: Sep 2006

I'm wholly unenthused, mostly because it doesn't matter (at lease for GW1). I'd say what confined people to one character was title hunting, not the Hall of Monuments. What is good about this news is that it's account-wide now, which is of benefit for GW2. Cheers.

kradens

kradens

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Mar 2007

:P guess.

R/

if u previous had 3 ancient armors, it'd mean that ud be able to get three ancient armor rewards for three gw2 characters now.

now. ur three ancient armors will count for one ancient armour. BUT, u can have AS MANY gw2 chars with the ancient armor reward.

sounds way better.

Solas

Solas

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Oct 2006

Ireland

Currently LF Active HA Guild, Glad 2, Comm.3, R2

E/

Thank and You, Best news i've heard in ages about GW

But please make it so that if the character is deleted the account wont suffer.


Just hope the rewards are very good

Clobimon

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Jul 2006

My vision of this news is:

If each character's HoM is left on the setting "character view" it will appear no different than it does now for each character. The only difference is the ability to put up Tormented weapons.

If "account view" is selected for a the hall you're in, it will show the maximum that you've achieved without duplications. A player like myself will end up seeing a hall very similar to their "main" character's. I currently have 26 titles on my main and all the titles on any other characters (except Leg. Survivor) are just repeated ones - multiple LG's, LSH's, etc.

The main point, or best point of this news is #2 "All Hall of Monuments accomplishments for any Guild Wars character on your account will be available to every Guild Wars 2 character on your account." That's all I needed to hear to feel good. Those like myself that have one character with 25-35 won't feel like they're at gunpoint to get their others with 5-15 up a lot higher so more GW2 characters benefit. And, those with 25-35 different titles all spread across multiple characters will benefit in the same way in GW2.

good deal!

WinterSnowblind

WinterSnowblind

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Feb 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yawgmoth
While I'm still amazed by the announcement of HoM going account-based, I can't imagine how they will handle the aggregation technically.
First I thought the acc-based HoM would be a separate clean one you would come into or activate and manually put in the achievements you want, coming with any characters you want. This would work with all of the monuments except the minipets one - you can show customized weapons or armors you wear to a fresh new account monument but your minis are already dedicated but not to a specific char or account. And even worse - players often got rid of dedicated minis, so they would have nothing to show. This would require an automatic way of filling the account minis monument, but if a programmer can do that, then changing Treasure Hunter and Wisdom to account-based should be a piece of cake.

Now something to think about: Is the Kind of a Big Deal title going to have any meaning in the account-based HoM, where all achievements can come from different chars?

The title itself doesn't have a statue but it changes the appearance of whole monument, upgrading it in 'ranks' from 0 to 5. But will you be able to bring all those maxed titles from different characters to your HoM to get the effect or you will need at least 1 char with "I Have Many Leather-Bound Books(4)" and fill other monuments however you want to achieve max rank "Honor"?
I assume character titles won't be affected. For example if you have five characters, all with one max title each, putting them into the HoM isn't going to give all of your characters Kind of a Big Deal, it just means you'll be able to see each of your characters accomplishments in the HoM.

I could be wrong, of course, but that's my understanding of it.

Covah

Forge Runner

Join Date: Aug 2006

Ontario, Canada

Catching Jellyfish With [소N트T ]

Me/Rt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
Oh....a....mai.....a.....ghod....... ANET has been taken over by aliens. This is not the real ANET. We have been deceived.

APRIL FOOLS!!!!!!!


Anyways this is good news. Lots more people will be going for LDoA it seems

VladDrakken

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Sep 2006

Drakken Death Dealers

N/W

Don't get me wrong, Im loving the tormented weapon updates, but I think a few of us are getting the short end of the stick with the new account-wide implementation.

You see, I have about around 80+ dedicated minis (3 full mini monuments), 25+ dedicated destroyer weapons (2 full weapons monuments), 3 full armor monuments and 3 full heroes monuments. This doesnt doesnt include the titles I tolled on different characters (4 full).

Some of us accepted the fact that the HOM was set up the way it is before the June 24 update, so we went ahead and filled up the characters we wanted to save for GW2. Yes, it wasn't perfect and it really sucked, but Anet should compensate those few people who worked hard. After all, by my count, I spent around 10mil (hard earned, not ebayed or farmed) gold to get my Hall of Monuments where its at right now.

This Bleeping bleep really bleep bleep bleep! Bleepers! Bleeping whiners!

... thoughts? Did any of you completed more than 2 Hall of Monuments prior to the June 24 update? If so, dont you feel a bit cheated and would expect a reward?




Vlad the Mad

shoyon456

shoyon456

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

D/

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladDrakken
... thoughts? Did any of you completed more than 2 Hall of Monuments prior to the June 24 update? If so, dont you feel a bit cheated and would expect a reward?

Vlad the Mad
No. I didn't like the system so I didn't buy into it.

I see how you would be upset, but you worked for those things in gw1. None of us knew/know how they would present themselves in gw2, and you can't really expect it to turn out your way.

Also, the new system doesnt make your accomplishments on each char worthless, im sure it'll all tie in together nicely.

Dylananimus

Dylananimus

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Mar 2007

The Eternal Champions

W/Mo

Cheer up, it's a game Nobody forced you to spend all that pixel money

Your reward should be your own sense of achievement, unless you only did it to make your e-peen bigger and that's all.