Quote:
Originally Posted by Abedeus
But you aren't getting those $900 for holidays. He is, you are not.
|
So what is it that newcomers to GW are
NOW getting that veterans can't have?
Quote:
And who cares you have done more, you know more and you ARE better than he is. You also have more experience and it's more sure you will work longer than a person that has been in the firm for a month or two.
|
You may know more, but maybe your employer knows better. Experience is important, but it's not counted in years. And it surely not means that you'll work longer, on the other hand you don't have to prove anything and may leave for better shores (while the new guy has to prove himself, or he'll be fired).
(FYI I'm not exploring the analogy for the sake of making fun of this discussion, I actually checked that everything I said was analog to the current situation in GW1...)
Quote:
Then what is? Amount of $ spent in online shop?
|
What about a combination of those, plus a vast quantity of facets of how you behave in-game and on fansites? Of course it's also a feeling and we can fight till death trying to prove we're more loyal than the other...
Quote:
And you made it in 4 copies, each with your own hands (requirement). And few new people come, give study results about the same thing, in some cases less (Masters < non-Masters analogy for missions). And every one of them got $800.
Ha-ha.
|
Your analogy is wrong, here's the correct one: you got $400 for your copy
before, at a time when the other guys wouldn't get anything because they didn't do the job; now you and these guys are doing the job and getting $800 for it. (your mistake was to compare the same copy you'd give before and after, judging it by your own standards/amoung of work, but its value is dependent on time). How's that unfair?
(The
"Ha-ha" is really childish...)
Quote:
Try doing something 9 times if it takes at least 10 hours to finish. Good luck.
|
No one forced you to do protectors or guardians, and you should have had fun doing it, or you're not "playing a game". It's the same now, no one forces you to do books. Yet you want your past actions to be rewarded by current standards (many people have explained why it's wrong here, for example: what about asking rewards for in-game actions that would have been credited later during a week-end special event?)
EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeko Nakano
For people WHO HAVENT ALREADY PLAYED ALL THE CONTENT this update gives them lots of stuff for just playing through as they would do anyway. For people WHO HAVE ALREADY PLAYED ALL THE CONTENT SEVERAL TIMES they're unlikely to want to do it again just to get a book filled.
|
Firstly I don't see how
you can speak for "veterans" (how much should you have played to be a so-called "veteran"? 10,000h over 20months? 1,000h over 36months?). Secondly, it's not Anet's fault that you don't want to do it and yet ask for the same reward. As I said before, I'd agree to simply ask for a filled book for each title (protector, guardian). But getting so vocal about it (in particular treating people "idiot") is just plain wrong.
Quote:
No, I mean that this update is designed for new/lazy players.
|
And to send you back your false over-generalisation: everyone that takes your side is a stupid/arrogant player. (hint, hint: this is not what I think, but I want to show you what you're doing, i.e. over-generalising; GW players are not "veteran" OR "new", and new is surely not equivalent to lazy...)
Quote:
They have to complete the campaigns anyway if they buy them, so if they do they get free stuff as well. But this doesn't benefit us because we've played them to death. What I'm saying is why doesn't ANet give something that benefits us without having to repeat what we've already done?
|
Because this is EQUALITY. Do the same thing as they do now and you'll get the same reward. EQUALITY is not "take something from the past, anything, and then balance it with something from now".