Sounds nice to me.
One god way to do so is by setting two separate Tabs in the Hero panel:
- Character Titles
- Account Titles.
PvE achievement titles would appear only in the Character tab.
PvP titles would appear only in the Account tab.
And PvE grind titles would appear in Both, at first in the Character tab, and once maxed, also in the Account tab.
That way a character would be able to keep its own Sunspear rank, that would be used for plot, while using the Account Sunspear rank for skills.
Make all grind-based titles account based.
MithranArkanere
jiggles
Quite frankly GW is less grind then the average MMO. The kind of a big deal title tack is completely optional and should not be made easier to get purely so everyone who got it previousl is punished for having dedication, and the people who continue to get it get rewarded for being less dedicated.
Can we have this thread closed now please?
and for the record am i not a Gwamm so dont think im talking about this because im whining about me.
Can we have this thread closed now please?
and for the record am i not a Gwamm so dont think im talking about this because im whining about me.
MithranArkanere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jiggles
Quite frankly GW is less grind then the average MMO. The kind of a big deal title tack is completely optional and should not be made easier to get purely so everyone who got it previousl is punished for having dedication, and the people who continue to get it get rewarded for being less dedicated.
Can we have this thread closed now please? and for the record am i not a Gwamm so dont think im talking about this because im whining about me. |
Johny bravo
Here we go again. I should just cut and paste from the weekly thread created onthis.
/notsigned.
While GW itself is not a grind based game, titles are. You don't have to grind to play the game. All essential skill, weapons, and armor are accessable and affordable.
Titles are a bonus time waster for those who want to do more in the game to progress their character. If titles were account wide they would be easier to get because doing cart. with a sin is a hell of a lot easier then with a necro. same with chest running. On the other hand other titles would be easier on a monk or ele. The idea is that your one character has done all these things which is why your one character is "known". Chest running is a purely grind self gratification title. No one runs 10,000 chests for pure fun (ok most people there might be one who would)
Also While we are at it why can we get fame for the first Zaishen battle HoH. Its not fair that I beat a team and don't get any credit for it.
/notsigned.
While GW itself is not a grind based game, titles are. You don't have to grind to play the game. All essential skill, weapons, and armor are accessable and affordable.
Titles are a bonus time waster for those who want to do more in the game to progress their character. If titles were account wide they would be easier to get because doing cart. with a sin is a hell of a lot easier then with a necro. same with chest running. On the other hand other titles would be easier on a monk or ele. The idea is that your one character has done all these things which is why your one character is "known". Chest running is a purely grind self gratification title. No one runs 10,000 chests for pure fun (ok most people there might be one who would)
Also While we are at it why can we get fame for the first Zaishen battle HoH. Its not fair that I beat a team and don't get any credit for it.
Richardt
I'm not in favor of this idea. And the reason I am is that alot of these titles are stupid easy to get.
Want to use Norn skills to great effect on a character? DO THE WORK!
Already got it maxed on another character? Do it again! It's not hard to max out these titles-hell, the vast majority of PvE skills are effective at rank5-and you can get that by completing whatever side rep you need, plus turning in a completed Heroes Handbook-in NM to boot! I got rank8 vanguard on my paragon (after maxing it on my warrior) within a week of playing casually-and the skill I needed became pretty effective at rank5-which I got within 2 days-again playing casually.
The only titles I would be in support of being account wide is Treasure Hunter and Wisdom. The rest should stay as is.
And to the OP-we get these threads pretty often. Instead of making a new one, just post in an old one.
Want to use Norn skills to great effect on a character? DO THE WORK!
Already got it maxed on another character? Do it again! It's not hard to max out these titles-hell, the vast majority of PvE skills are effective at rank5-and you can get that by completing whatever side rep you need, plus turning in a completed Heroes Handbook-in NM to boot! I got rank8 vanguard on my paragon (after maxing it on my warrior) within a week of playing casually-and the skill I needed became pretty effective at rank5-which I got within 2 days-again playing casually.
The only titles I would be in support of being account wide is Treasure Hunter and Wisdom. The rest should stay as is.
And to the OP-we get these threads pretty often. Instead of making a new one, just post in an old one.
Abedeus
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Johny bravo
Here we go again. I should just cut and paste from the weekly thread created onthis.
/notsigned. While GW itself is not a grind based game, titles are. You don't have to grind to play the game. All essential skill, weapons, and armor are accessable and affordable. |
/signed
I dont freakin' want to waste time playing 7 character when some jerks play 1 character and reap benefits. I didn't see anything on my game's box about ,,play 1 character or be f'ed up''.
anonymous
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Abedeus
STOP FAILING!!! WHY YOU ARE FAILING!!!! STOP IT NOW!!! OR MORE KITTENS WILL DIEEEE!!!
/signed I dont freakin' want to waste time playing 7 character when some jerks play 1 character and reap benefits. I didn't see anything on my game's box about ,,play 1 character or be f'ed up''. |
Abedeus
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by anonymous
Thats how it is in almost every single other game. You play one character at the expense of others. 7 characters aren't supposed to be the same as 1 character because they aren't. No one is forcing you to play 7 characters, play 1 and stick with it. If I grind a character to level 70 in WoW, do all my other characters deserve to be level 70 too? No, because I didn't play them.
|
Grind in GW is boring, repetitive, mindkilling, kittenslaughtering and f'ing lame. Besides, I still remind you that one of the promises behind GW was ,,two characters at same level and with same equipment (not exactly same, but with possibility to have same) will have equal chances, but skilled player will be stronger''. Maybe you will tell me farmer is more skilled than... skilled player, or that swayer/ritspiker farming r9 is more skilled than r6 playing balanced?
Quote:
| play 1 and stick with it. |
Quote:
| I didn't play them. |
Lishy
Before you start with the Reputation title track QQing, please acknowledge that they are merely examples.
This is about accomplishments and the maxed title track("People know me") in general.
To get that title, it is unfair to be limited to one character if you already maxed enough titles, but not on the same character.
That, and it would be more to the "anti-grind" feature in guild wars.
I suggest a spot in the hero panel for "Maxed titles"
This is about accomplishments and the maxed title track("People know me") in general.
To get that title, it is unfair to be limited to one character if you already maxed enough titles, but not on the same character.
That, and it would be more to the "anti-grind" feature in guild wars.
I suggest a spot in the hero panel for "Maxed titles"
Snow Bunny
Oh well, /signed
I'd prefer ANet to make their game more interesting then not.
I'd prefer ANet to make their game more interesting then not.
Johny bravo
So Rep titles was a bad example. Then tell me how my warrior gets more "wisdom" when my necro ID's titles or how he becomes an "expert treasure hunter when he never opens chests. Will i ever get max wisdom or treasure hunter, maybe I run 30 chests a day and I am at 1800. If i get it cool if not then so be it. One toon shouldn't get credit for stuff you do on another toon. I mean don't get me wrong it would have been nice if i could farm golden eggs with my ele so my necro could advance in treasure hunting but that makes no sense. I mean while your at it can my ele get the 14 mil + exp I have on my necro so he has more skill points.
As for your non-grind statment. Max titles have little effect on gameplay. Most titles are just as effective near max then maxxed and it is usually that last tier that is a grind. But hey if it makes you feel better whine away.
As for your non-grind statment. Max titles have little effect on gameplay. Most titles are just as effective near max then maxxed and it is usually that last tier that is a grind. But hey if it makes you feel better whine away.
Lishy
Johny Bravo, you misunderstand. A warrior opening a chest wont give you "More wisdon"
It will just allow you to own the max title once it reaches max. It would also contribute towards "People know me" Therefor allowing you to have more freedom in playing multiple characters instead of trying to get all your titles fit onto one sole character.
That doesn't make sense? Go complain to ANET on how Kain Fz will have have Legendary Survivor displayed in HoM when Kain Xd did all the work.
It will just allow you to own the max title once it reaches max. It would also contribute towards "People know me" Therefor allowing you to have more freedom in playing multiple characters instead of trying to get all your titles fit onto one sole character.
That doesn't make sense? Go complain to ANET on how Kain Fz will have have Legendary Survivor displayed in HoM when Kain Xd did all the work.
Don Doggy
/signed
Most titles should be account wide.
Most titles should be account wide.
Johny bravo
I don't think legendary survivor should be an account wide title either, but I am not going to complain to ANET to change it. I just find it funny how everyone complains about how ANET is making everything to easy. Ursan, SF, PVE only skills, but then they want Anet to make it easier to get an titles. The whole idea of the people know me title is to make it difficult to get. It requires money, time, and effort. It is supposed to be a goal for a character not an account. Dumbing it down makes it lose its stature, kind of like FoW, everyone has now it so it doesn't stand out anymore. You do that with the KoaBD title track and you won't see someone with that title and go Damn that took a lot of effort.
The only titles that should be account wide are PvP titles because everyone changes professions so often to fill different roles.
The only titles that should be account wide are PvP titles because everyone changes professions so often to fill different roles.
cellardweller
It serves a purpose for grindmonkeys to aim for and doesn't take anything away from people that don't achieve it - I don't see the point in making a purely cosmetic effect easier to achieve. If you were proposing to make one of the game affecting titles like reps account wide you'd have my support.
/unsigned.
/unsigned.
BabyJ
So by your logic my monk that has legendary vanquisher title my Rit that hasnt even finished a campaign should have it also? Or, legendary skill hunter, even tho my rit only has a couple of elites, should have max skill hunter also? Even the rep titles, my necro hasnt even touched any spot in eotn except boreal station and Eye of the north, should have max rank rep titles? I think not. The HoM will be made account wide and I think thats good enough. My other characters that haven't done the work to gain max rank titles shouldn't reap the benefits (ranks in KoaBD title track) of my other characters max titles.
Dograzor
/signed, grinding on 1 char is already killing me
D E C E P T I V E
/signed
agree
agree
Dr.Jones
/signed 100% i have been bring this up in other treads everywhere.
Johny bravo
While you at it can all the areas you unlock be account wide too? I don't think I should have to beat all the campaigns on every character to get access to all the areas. And skill I mean if I unlock them on one character they should be unlocked on all my characters so I don't have to pay to get them again, like heroes. Also I have 2 accounts so its not fair that I grind the titles out on one character and both my accounts don't get credit.
Again you seem to be missing the point. Titles were created to set goals for characters that have already done everything. Stop trying to dumb everything down.
Again you seem to be missing the point. Titles were created to set goals for characters that have already done everything. Stop trying to dumb everything down.
Murmel
n1 spelling wrong in the topic lulz 
But seriously, yeah some max titles should be account wide.
But seriously, yeah some max titles should be account wide.
Dr.Jones
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Johny bravo
While you at it can all the areas you unlock be account wide too? I don't think I should have to beat all the campaigns on every character to get access to all the areas. And skill I mean if I unlock them on one character they should be unlocked on all my characters so I don't have to pay to get them again, like heroes. Also I have 2 accounts so its not fair that I grind the titles out on one character and both my accounts don't get credit.
Again you seem to be missing the point. Titles were created to set goals for characters that have already done everything. Stop trying to dumb everything down. |
Yawgmoth
I mostly agree, this thread gets a
/signed
but I think the basic idea needs many improvements.
It's not as simple as changing everything into account-based - Different titles should be looked upon separately and treated differently!
The most important is the Max'ed Titles (Kind of a Big Deal) title track.
It should count *unique* titles max'ed on the entire account.
This title should be The way to show YOUR achievements aggregated, not extreme dedication to just 1 character.
There's nothing wrong with allowing displaying this title on any character, it's pure vanity, no extra effect, so it wouldn't hurt if a lvl1 char in Pre or a PvP char had a Smelly Guildhall(5). But most importantly you earned it, you put the same effort as someone who did all titles on one char.
Most of the other titles should remain character-based themselves! (exceptions listed below)
So a character who never drinked shouldn't be able to display Incorrigible Ale Hound, a level 3 that just entered Kamadan shouldn't be a Legendary Sunspear, a char who has never seen an Asura shouldn't be considered Not Too Shabby, a character that died early shouldn't run around showing Legendary Survivor (giving a chance to old characters who never had it is a different issue),
but,
if you max'ed those titles on different characters each of them should do a +1 to the KaoBD track displayable on all characters on your account.
But wait, there's more, there's some bad design and some repetetive grind to be fixed:
A high priority issue is Treasure Hunter, which should be changed into acc-based from the very beginning - you should be able to contribute to this title no matter which char you play, so the chests you open on different chars don't feel like a waste. (and there's no reason not to change Wisdom in the same way while at it, although it's not that important by itself)
Now there are the reputation titles...
My suggestion for improving the SS/LB/Norn/Asura/Dwarf/Ebon titles without making them entirely account based is:
If you have max'ed one of those titles on a character, your other characters that are level 20 gain 4x more points for that title from all sources (including books and quest rewards). And maybe even more: If you've finished the appropriate game storyline (NF/EotN) the gain rate for that title could be x8 instead!
x8 is a MASSIVE difference, even the most whiny whiners shouldn't complain about any grind then.
/signed
but I think the basic idea needs many improvements.
It's not as simple as changing everything into account-based - Different titles should be looked upon separately and treated differently!
The most important is the Max'ed Titles (Kind of a Big Deal) title track.
It should count *unique* titles max'ed on the entire account.
This title should be The way to show YOUR achievements aggregated, not extreme dedication to just 1 character.
There's nothing wrong with allowing displaying this title on any character, it's pure vanity, no extra effect, so it wouldn't hurt if a lvl1 char in Pre or a PvP char had a Smelly Guildhall(5). But most importantly you earned it, you put the same effort as someone who did all titles on one char.
Most of the other titles should remain character-based themselves! (exceptions listed below)
So a character who never drinked shouldn't be able to display Incorrigible Ale Hound, a level 3 that just entered Kamadan shouldn't be a Legendary Sunspear, a char who has never seen an Asura shouldn't be considered Not Too Shabby, a character that died early shouldn't run around showing Legendary Survivor (giving a chance to old characters who never had it is a different issue),
but,
if you max'ed those titles on different characters each of them should do a +1 to the KaoBD track displayable on all characters on your account.
But wait, there's more, there's some bad design and some repetetive grind to be fixed:
A high priority issue is Treasure Hunter, which should be changed into acc-based from the very beginning - you should be able to contribute to this title no matter which char you play, so the chests you open on different chars don't feel like a waste. (and there's no reason not to change Wisdom in the same way while at it, although it's not that important by itself)
Now there are the reputation titles...
My suggestion for improving the SS/LB/Norn/Asura/Dwarf/Ebon titles without making them entirely account based is:
If you have max'ed one of those titles on a character, your other characters that are level 20 gain 4x more points for that title from all sources (including books and quest rewards). And maybe even more: If you've finished the appropriate game storyline (NF/EotN) the gain rate for that title could be x8 instead!
x8 is a MASSIVE difference, even the most whiny whiners shouldn't complain about any grind then.
Shayne Hawke
More titles should be account based, or should have ways to lessen the burden on future characters if the title is maxed, or high enough, etc.
The maxed title track should not be account based. It does not affect gameplay, so it's not necessary in any way that you have that title, nor will it benefit you for having it.
/notsigned
The maxed title track should not be account based. It does not affect gameplay, so it's not necessary in any way that you have that title, nor will it benefit you for having it.
/notsigned
Lady Raenef
Are you all Korean? I'm half-korean, and even I hate grinding.
Anything to reduce grinding gets my /sign.
Anything to reduce grinding gets my /sign.
inscribed
/signed.
this idea doesn't make it 'easier' to get KOABD, you are still doing the same amount of grinding. just because you spread the grind between multiple characters instead of one doesn't mean you did any less grinding.
this idea doesn't make it 'easier' to get KOABD, you are still doing the same amount of grinding. just because you spread the grind between multiple characters instead of one doesn't mean you did any less grinding.
Lycan Nibbler
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lady Raenef
Anything to reduce grinding gets my /sign.
|
/not signed
If you dont want to put the effort in to get a title then fine, but dont QQ that you dont have it.
I have maxed SS and LB on several chars, its pretty easy to do one char completely on a special weekend (I usually get 2 done) so please dont say its hard.
Yes, I have GWAMM and am working on KoaBD on other chars, making titles account wide would yet again be anet sticking (1 or 2) fingers up at the people who made the effort.
Horus
this way Anet would kill 2 "problems" with one move - chars who were made before titles will have a chance to get LS title and ppl will finally be able to enjoy playing more than one char, since they will all have shared titles. Why does it matter if you have GWAMM on 1 char or on 5? It takes same ammount of effort in both cases - just because you do something on different chars it doesn't mean you had to explore less of Tyria and capped less skills.
/signed
/signed
spyke136
this doesnt make GWAMM easier...
honestly are people on here getting dumber or just choosing to not use logic.
letting titles be account wide means you have the freedom to do the titles on ANY character. you still have to max 30 titles. and since HoM is(will eventually) account wide anyway it only makes sense that your whole account should be a GWAMM.
stop being stupid people.
SIGNED. A thousand times over.
honestly are people on here getting dumber or just choosing to not use logic.
letting titles be account wide means you have the freedom to do the titles on ANY character. you still have to max 30 titles. and since HoM is(will eventually) account wide anyway it only makes sense that your whole account should be a GWAMM.
stop being stupid people.
SIGNED. A thousand times over.
upier
That would be insanely sweet!
Less grind is good!
/signed
Less grind is good!
/signed
isildorbiafra
Not signed/ just like the person that does not delete his character, but has been playing the game just as long as i have, gets a mini; but i dont, cause i recreated my character several times.
Point is choosing to invest all my time in the development of a single character and therefore loosing out on playing different professions should count for something!
Besides maxing some titles is easier depending on what profession you choose. Try doing carthographer with a warrior.........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
Point is choosing to invest all my time in the development of a single character and therefore loosing out on playing different professions should count for something!
Besides maxing some titles is easier depending on what profession you choose. Try doing carthographer with a warrior.........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
isildorbiafra
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by inscribed
/signed.
this idea doesn't make it 'easier' to get KOABD, you are still doing the same amount of grinding. just because you spread the grind between multiple characters instead of one doesn't mean you did any less grinding. |
the_jos
I'm not too worried about max KoaBD, it still requires a large amount of grind.
However, I think there should be a split between character achievements and account achievements, like there is now.
In my opinion the vanquishing titles and protector-like titles are typical character achievements. The same with carto.
However, I would not mind if A-net changed those somewhat.
Let's say if you have the Guardian title on a character you can skip one mission on the next character and still be able to have it count to KoaBD.
Carto? Make it count at let's say 90 or even 95% if one has the cartographer title at another character. It's the small bit above that that's really troublesome, specially without texmod.
SS, LB and the EotN titles? Make additional characters get the titles count and benefits at half of the original required points.
So max SS skill-benefit wise at 25K, maxing the EotN titles would still require 80K points.
Remember, I'm only talking about the benefits of those titles and their count to the KoaBD track for 'secondary characters'. If one wants the full title and wear it, grind it!
People should invest if they want a certain title, not get it for free.
The titles that I think should be account based are things like drunk, party and sweet. Probably treasure and wisdom. I take lockpicks on only one character because I just cannot afford the treasure title on several characters. I do my ID's on the same character, don't mind doing that but I'm not sure if that's the best. I would rather have those in one 'pool' even if it's raised from 10K to 15K.
But I think there is more to be said.
I have some guildies who are working on one character only.
But also several others who had no problem getting 25 maxed titles on several characters.
So while it requires a lot of grind it's possible, I'm probably more online than those players but just don't care that much about titles.
However, I think there should be a split between character achievements and account achievements, like there is now.
In my opinion the vanquishing titles and protector-like titles are typical character achievements. The same with carto.
However, I would not mind if A-net changed those somewhat.
Let's say if you have the Guardian title on a character you can skip one mission on the next character and still be able to have it count to KoaBD.
Carto? Make it count at let's say 90 or even 95% if one has the cartographer title at another character. It's the small bit above that that's really troublesome, specially without texmod.
SS, LB and the EotN titles? Make additional characters get the titles count and benefits at half of the original required points.
So max SS skill-benefit wise at 25K, maxing the EotN titles would still require 80K points.
Remember, I'm only talking about the benefits of those titles and their count to the KoaBD track for 'secondary characters'. If one wants the full title and wear it, grind it!
People should invest if they want a certain title, not get it for free.
The titles that I think should be account based are things like drunk, party and sweet. Probably treasure and wisdom. I take lockpicks on only one character because I just cannot afford the treasure title on several characters. I do my ID's on the same character, don't mind doing that but I'm not sure if that's the best. I would rather have those in one 'pool' even if it's raised from 10K to 15K.
But I think there is more to be said.
I have some guildies who are working on one character only.
But also several others who had no problem getting 25 maxed titles on several characters.
So while it requires a lot of grind it's possible, I'm probably more online than those players but just don't care that much about titles.
Cebe
I honestly don't see why a new thread needed to be created to discuss this, but since there is a large amount of discussion I'll just merge with an existing thread.
Johny bravo
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dr.Jones
your missing the point the objective is to get certain titles to be maxed for all your ch on your account, only when you max it. i kind of agree that not all the titles should go like this but some of them should.
|
As for the other people saying well this doesn't make the GWAMM title easier to get, take your heads out of you A#$ and think about it. If titles become account wide it will become relativly easy to get GWAMM on multiple characters. Even if we stick to the one listed in the OP if you get GWAMM on one character you will most likely have around 9-10 titles to start with on all others. so basically all you need to do is the skill hunter, cartography (both can be done while vanquishing) and guardian title tracks to get 29 titles, MotN 30 (use lucky and you can drop MotN). While the first title would still take a lot of effort multiple titles would be simply a look at what I got. It would take the holy S$^% away when I see someone with a maxxed Treasure hunter title (there can't be that many out there either).
As you can see I am opposed to this, even though if we did get it I would be R2 on all my characters. Maxxed KoaBD is a grind title and should stay that way. What come next - 10 million faction is just really to hard to get accross all my characters we need to make it so you get more factoin from AB. Plus I was in a kurzick guild and now I am in a Luxon guild, can we just combine the faction so they can count together.
Marverick
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miss Drops Az
Maybe they should give you the game already completed too.../facepalm
/not signed If you dont want to put the effort in to get a title then fine, but dont QQ that you dont have it. I have maxed SS and LB on several chars, its pretty easy to do one char completely on a special weekend (I usually get 2 done) so please dont say its hard. Yes, I have GWAMM and am working on KoaBD on other chars, making titles account wide would yet again be anet sticking (1 or 2) fingers up at the people who made the effort. |
MithranArkanere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Johny bravo
I am not missing the point, you are missing mine. Take the wisdom title, in theory as you ID an item you become more knowledgable (this is a stretch). How should this apply to all you characters then? Same with treasure hunting. I realize that the chest spawns are basically the same but the idea is that the more chest unlocked by this toon the more treasure hunting he has done.
As for the other people saying well this doesn't make the GWAMM title easier to get, take your heads out of you A#$ and think about it. If titles become account wide it will become relativly easy to get GWAMM on multiple characters. Even if we stick to the one listed in the OP if you get GWAMM on one character you will most likely have around 9-10 titles to start with on all others. so basically all you need to do is the skill hunter, cartography (both can be done while vanquishing) and guardian title tracks to get 29 titles, MotN 30 (use lucky and you can drop MotN). While the first title would still take a lot of effort multiple titles would be simply a look at what I got. It would take the holy S$^% away when I see someone with a maxxed Treasure hunter title (there can't be that many out there either). As you can see I am opposed to this, even though if we did get it I would be R2 on all my characters. Maxxed KoaBD is a grind title and should stay that way. What come next - 10 million faction is just really to hard to get accross all my characters we need to make it so you get more factoin from AB. Plus I was in a kurzick guild and now I am in a Luxon guild, can we just combine the faction so they can count together. |
- PvP titles: Appear only in the Account tab.
- PvE achievement titles: Appear only in the character tab. (Protector, Skill hunter, vanquisher, etc)
- PvE grind titles: Appear in both tabs.
* Each character has its own rank in the character tab.
* One a character gets at least rank 1, the highest rank of the account appear in the account tab.
* Until a character maxes the title, the highest rank of the account appears in the account panel.
* After one character maxes the title, the sum of all titles appear in the account panel.
* The personal rank of the character stays in the character tab.
* For Plot checkings and the GWAMM title, the character rank is used.
* For Skills attributes and the HoM, the account rank is used.
See? Easy, no level 1 GWAMM and no easy-go though the plot, but grind vanished.
Lawliet Kira
hmmmm lemme think YES PLEASE
/signed x1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000
/signed x1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000
Kinn
its pretty clear to me that for certain titles, there needs to be a way to accelerate the points accumulation for other characters, once you've acheived the title for one already.
For example it would make no sense for a new character to start with r10 Norn, but I see nothing wrong with that character having a certain multiplier on their Norn points accumulation, after another character has already maxed Norn. The multiplier could even increase as more characters on the account max that title.
Call it the "friends in high places" mechanic, if you want
For example it would make no sense for a new character to start with r10 Norn, but I see nothing wrong with that character having a certain multiplier on their Norn points accumulation, after another character has already maxed Norn. The multiplier could even increase as more characters on the account max that title.
Call it the "friends in high places" mechanic, if you want
Lishy
Well, according to the lore of guild wars, besides all the useless henchmen and 1337 heroes, isn't your group of characters the same group of heroes who saved Tyria , Cantha, and Elona?
I mean, in GW 2, won't HoM acknowledge all your characters since HoM is account based?
It makes sense.
/SIGNED OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAAND TIMES
Seriously, what the RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GO is taking ANET so damned long? =/
I mean, in GW 2, won't HoM acknowledge all your characters since HoM is account based?
It makes sense.
/SIGNED OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAAND TIMES
Seriously, what the RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GO is taking ANET so damned long? =/