Originally Posted by Sir Green Aluminum
Don't be like Socrates and die for principals when you can escape, save your self the frustration, time and mod the damn thing.
|
Canthan Grandmaster Cartographer in a day - What's A-Net going to do about it?
jhu
Quote:
ChaoticCoyote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Green Aluminum
No because they don't give an unfair advantage, and the second one is part of the game that everyone who has EOTN has access to.
|
As far as I'm concerned, TextMod's no different than a mission walkthrough.
Wulfgast
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaoticCoyote
As far as I'm concerned, TextMod's no different than a mission walkthrough.
|
Martin Firestorm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Green Aluminum
Don't be like Socrates and die for principals
|
Sub Frost
I've done tyria GMC without the help of mod's and elona GMC with mod's... Both ways are legit, both ways get the job done...
For me, it's pretty much up to the player itself , considering the time/way they want to use.
For me, it's pretty much up to the player itself , considering the time/way they want to use.
elektra_lucia
Can you politely tell me how it is legit? Considering it effects the time it will take, and MMORPG's are about time.
Keep in mind that I am not saying:
Wiki is fair.
Running is fair.
Paying for something is fair.
so don't reply with 'it's fair because guild wiki is up!'.
Please explain to me clearly, how it is fair? A cheat for tomb raider on playstation one, is still a cheat. Regardless of if the game is now worthless and it's not multiplayer .
I am also not emotional on the subject. I do not really care who cheats, I just want a valid explination. Not one of you have managed to do that, all you have done is quote someone else blindly following them.
I have a one million gold bet on a friend that I will get CGC quicker than he will. I will not be using any mods or outside help to do it. I will just be playing the game, like I would if I had the computer with nothing installed - no internet browsers. Just the game. We are going to make new characters from scratch.
I don't know what my friend will be doing. Do you think he will be able to cheat?
Keep in mind that I am not saying:
Wiki is fair.
Running is fair.
Paying for something is fair.
so don't reply with 'it's fair because guild wiki is up!'.
Please explain to me clearly, how it is fair? A cheat for tomb raider on playstation one, is still a cheat. Regardless of if the game is now worthless and it's not multiplayer .
I am also not emotional on the subject. I do not really care who cheats, I just want a valid explination. Not one of you have managed to do that, all you have done is quote someone else blindly following them.
I have a one million gold bet on a friend that I will get CGC quicker than he will. I will not be using any mods or outside help to do it. I will just be playing the game, like I would if I had the computer with nothing installed - no internet browsers. Just the game. We are going to make new characters from scratch.
I don't know what my friend will be doing. Do you think he will be able to cheat?
kazjun
I reckon 100% is 100% regardless of which method you use. A guy using texmod still has to go and map out all those places.
Saying that MMORPG's should be about time only seems a bit self-centred. If you think that's what it should be about, then that's fine, but if others think that it is about getting the task done rather than just putting in the hours then you shouldn't force them to play your way only. The title is about percent mapped, not hours logged.
Saying that MMORPG's should be about time only seems a bit self-centred. If you think that's what it should be about, then that's fine, but if others think that it is about getting the task done rather than just putting in the hours then you shouldn't force them to play your way only. The title is about percent mapped, not hours logged.
Leighwyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by elektra_lucia
Can you politely tell me how it is legit? Considering it effects the time it will take, and MMORPG's are about time.
Keep in mind that I am not saying: Wiki is fair. Running is fair. Paying for something is fair. so don't reply with 'it's fair because guild wiki is up!'. Please explain to me clearly, how it is fair? A cheat for tomb raider on playstation one, is still a cheat. Regardless of if the game is now worthless and it's not multiplayer . I am also not emotional on the subject. I do not really care who cheats, I just want a valid explination. Not one of you have managed to do that, all you have done is quote someone else blindly following them. I have a one million gold bet on a friend that I will get CGC quicker than he will. I will not be using any mods or outside help to do it. I will just be playing the game, like I would if I had the computer with nothing installed - no internet browsers. Just the game. We are going to make new characters from scratch. I don't know what my friend will be doing. Do you think he will be able to cheat? |
It's legitimate because it is an in-game graphic mod in-line with the guidelines of acceptance stated by Gaile and Emily on the official wiki:
"What I want to say above all about this matter is that if you're going to mod, have fun, but do stick with the benign and positive uses of the programs and create mods that impact the game only in ways that are fun and harmless." -Gaile
"As a general rule of thumb, we don't mind if you do things like this to make your own playing experience more fun." -Emily
From the EULA it says:
"You agree not to use any hardware or software, including but not limited to third party tools, or any other method of support which may in any way influence or advantage your use of the Service which is not authorized by NC Interactive, including but not limited to the use of 'bots' and/or any other method by which the Service may be played automatically without human input."
In my own opinion, since it is not a black and white issue, the prior quotes from the official wiki "authorize" the use of Texmod by NC Interactive, so long as they fall in-line with the wording of those two quotes.
Is it a benign, positive, fun, and harmless mod? Hard to argue since those are all opinionated terms, so I'll give my own take and you can decide which side it falls on. For benign, I take that as meaning 'not harmful', whose opposite would be something like modifying the activation bar texture so that an interrupt bot can be created. Positive would mean it improves rather than detracts, and I'd say that the mod fixes something that was never well-implemented in the game (fog visibility in places, extreme edge revealing, what have you). Harmless? Sure, unless you're one of the those who practice title elitism in which case you would consider it harmful toward your own prestigious status. To me, that is a hollow and selfish stance to take but it's still one available.
Basically, the mod fits within what we've been told is OK given that you accept that the title will now be easier to achieve and consider titles to be personal achievement or some goal to work toward. If you are a 'badge of honor' type, then you'll probably disagree on the "harmless" tag.
As for your bet with your friend, if he uses the mod while you do not then you will most definitely lose.
Diddy bow
I find nothing wrong with this mod, whats running around the edge of a map proving anyway?
Burst Cancel
Here's a thought question: is it okay to use cheat codes in a single-player game?
This question has been hotly debated on gaming forums for years. GMC Textmod is essentially the same issue.
The real question here isn't just what's legal or not, or what affects or players or not. In principle, it actually encompasses the whole of all kinds of gaming aids (is it okay to use strategy guides?), and, at its logical extremity, becomes an issue of general ethics. Some people have the view that people should be allowed to do whatever they want provided that it doesn't affect others. Others view that former group as morally degenerate. Which side you take on this (extremely minor) GMC issue is generally going to mirror which of the above-mentioned camps you are in.
This question has been hotly debated on gaming forums for years. GMC Textmod is essentially the same issue.
The real question here isn't just what's legal or not, or what affects or players or not. In principle, it actually encompasses the whole of all kinds of gaming aids (is it okay to use strategy guides?), and, at its logical extremity, becomes an issue of general ethics. Some people have the view that people should be allowed to do whatever they want provided that it doesn't affect others. Others view that former group as morally degenerate. Which side you take on this (extremely minor) GMC issue is generally going to mirror which of the above-mentioned camps you are in.
unienaule
Since when is showing someone how to do something cheating? I saw a book on long-distance runner training the other day, would I be considered a cheater and banned from the Olympics for reading it? No.
Benefiting from someone else's experience is not cheating.
Breaking the rules (i.e. with cheat codes affect your CHARACTER, unlike texmod) is cheating.
Benefiting from someone else's experience is not cheating.
Breaking the rules (i.e. with cheat codes affect your CHARACTER, unlike texmod) is cheating.
Amon Warrior
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torqual
My only request is therefore, to make a level playing field for everyone, the 'unfogging' and borderlines appearance of the in-game minimap should be implemented in the standard guild wars client to mirror Texmod so that all players can benefit from the vastly increased ease of Cartography and enjoy obtaining the titles. Personally, I would enjoy going for Cartography titles with some of my other characters, using this kind of map that clearly highlights unexplored areas. So, please implement this for everyone.
|
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burst Cancel
is it okay to use strategy guides?
|
Amon Warrior
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
If someone wanders around trying to get that last .03%, hat's entirely different than if someone can fire up the mod, jump to the map, and complete the final percentage in a matter of minutes.
|
Shouldn't Guild Wars be about improving the entertainment level?
With this tool, I now realize that I still have a lot to do with this title, opposite to having to retrace my steps everywhere to try and get the missing parts. The mod removed the blindfold and focused my attention to where I actually need to go - something that I'm really grateful for.
Kudos for players who actually took the initiative to improve this portion of the game.
Kula
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazjun
Saying that MMORPG's should be about time only seems a bit self-centred. If you think that's what it should be about, then that's fine, but if others think that it is about getting the task done rather than just putting in the hours then you shouldn't force them to play your way only. The title is about percent mapped, not hours logged.
|
Savio
Quote:
Originally Posted by elektra_lucia
Please explain to me clearly, how it is fair?
|
Playing by the rules of the game, all you have to do to get GMC is map every location, regardless of how you do it. The game doesn't say, "You compared maps to unfog this area, you have to go back and do it again," it says, "You mapped this area, you get another 0.1% to your title."
From the ordinary player's view, less time and effort to accomplish something happens to be a good thing. Asking others for help, comparing maps, or using a mod wouldn't be cheating to them (well, they wouldn't care, same thing.)
From a purist's view, using any outside help cheapens the reward and is cheating. There are also varying views where using x is okay, but using y isn't.
I couldn't care less about the ordinary player's and the purist's views, as those are largely subjective. Objectively, Arenanet doesn't care, and the game doesn't care, so I don't see why I should care.
Burst Cancel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again
ANet says "yes."
|
My point is that the issue isn't as cut-and-dry as, "is it allowed?", "is it cheating?" Nobody (at least not anyone I know of) would think that using a strategy guide or FAQ is 'cheating'. However, you'll notice that being able to accomplish something without that kind of help 'means' more. You see this in single-player games all the time - there is a difference, somehow, between playing a perfect game without guides, and doing the same while using every FAQ available.
Cheat codes are much closer to this issue of textmods - neither one affects anyone else, and both are allowed by the game.
Zeek Aran
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leighwyn
Is it a benign, positive, fun, and harmless mod? Hard to argue since those are all opinionated terms, so I'll give my own take and you can decide which side it falls on. For benign, I take that as meaning 'not harmful', whose opposite would be something like modifying the activation bar texture so that an interrupt bot can be created. Positive would mean it improves rather than detracts, and I'd say that the mod fixes something that was never well-implemented in the game (fog visibility in places, extreme edge revealing, what have you). Harmless? Sure, unless you're one of the those who practice title elitism in which case you would consider it harmful toward your own prestigious status. To me, that is a hollow and selfish stance to take but it's still one available.
he "harmless" tag. |
Lady Lozza
It seems to me that the issue and question here is really "what constitudes a cheat?"
I believe a cheat is something that gives you an (unfair) advantage over other players. That allows you to gain something for nothing.
So is the mod a cheat?
It does not give you something for nothing. You still need to map the full 100% of the map by edge scrapping.
It does however make it EASIER. So I ask again, is it a cheat?
I have one cartography title. Close to getting some of the others. Have never used mods, but have made use of the guides (both the literature and the people) on guru and the occassional GIMP session. In getting GMC Cantha I walked some maps as much as 4 or 5 times. Stupid isn't it? Should have edged scraped more carefully. This is what took me the time. If I had edge scrapped porperly the first time through I wouldn't have had this issue.
Some people have edge scraped every map once only (without the use of the tool). These are the people that mapped the quickest, so are they cheats because they didn't have to re-visit areas? I wouldn't have thought so.
Those who edge scrape with the mods do so NO QUICKER than anyone else who edge scrapes properly once over. Simply because I had to map several areas multiple times does NOT make anyone else who mapped therm fewer times than me a cheat.
I believe a cheat is something that gives you an (unfair) advantage over other players. That allows you to gain something for nothing.
So is the mod a cheat?
It does not give you something for nothing. You still need to map the full 100% of the map by edge scrapping.
It does however make it EASIER. So I ask again, is it a cheat?
I have one cartography title. Close to getting some of the others. Have never used mods, but have made use of the guides (both the literature and the people) on guru and the occassional GIMP session. In getting GMC Cantha I walked some maps as much as 4 or 5 times. Stupid isn't it? Should have edged scraped more carefully. This is what took me the time. If I had edge scrapped porperly the first time through I wouldn't have had this issue.
Some people have edge scraped every map once only (without the use of the tool). These are the people that mapped the quickest, so are they cheats because they didn't have to re-visit areas? I wouldn't have thought so.
Those who edge scrape with the mods do so NO QUICKER than anyone else who edge scrapes properly once over. Simply because I had to map several areas multiple times does NOT make anyone else who mapped therm fewer times than me a cheat.
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burst Cancel
Yeah, I say yes too, and?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again
And Gaile, if this is considered cheating, then why do you have links to the free GW strategy guide, the Guild Wars wiki, in-game?
|
I'm not being all like "Ha HAAAA! Try THIS forum post on fo siiiize, Burst!!!", it was just a safe opportunity for me to bring up a critical point
But to actually add onto your point - about cheat codes and Texmod - I'd have to say it depended on what benefits the cheat code gave (a good example being "does the cheat code give you all the weapons in the game, or does it just give your character a funky costume?")
And as Lozza just stated, this looks like it may be 100% related to personal opinion. One could consider it a complete and unfair advantage, while another may consider it nothing more than a simple hint in the right direction.
jezz
Quote:
Originally Posted by elektra_lucia
Can you politely tell me how it is legit? Considering it effects the time it will take, and MMORPG's are about time.
Keep in mind that I am not saying: Wiki is fair. Running is fair. Paying for something is fair. so don't reply with 'it's fair because guild wiki is up!'. Please explain to me clearly, how it is fair? A cheat for tomb raider on playstation one, is still a cheat. Regardless of if the game is now worthless and it's not multiplayer . I am also not emotional on the subject. I do not really care who cheats, I just want a valid explination. Not one of you have managed to do that, all you have done is quote someone else blindly following them. I have a one million gold bet on a friend that I will get CGC quicker than he will. I will not be using any mods or outside help to do it. I will just be playing the game, like I would if I had the computer with nothing installed - no internet browsers. Just the game. We are going to make new characters from scratch. I don't know what my friend will be doing. Do you think he will be able to cheat? |
time to get over it..and if you dont care quit posting in here.
ChaoticCoyote
Quote:
Originally Posted by elektra_lucia
MMORPG's are about time.
|
Ignoring those issues, I disagree completely about you definition of an MMO. MMORPGs are about THE EXPERIENCE, not about time. GW provides a rather boring and repetitive experience in exchange for meaningless vanity items... so why not cut down on the tedium by using somethign like TexMod to gain a title that has NO intrinsic menaing or practical effect?
FyrFytr998
To the OP....
So are people cheating at life when they use Mapquest or Google Earth to look for directions to get somewhere? I see.....Their experience would be much more self gratifying if they just wandered around town until they found the address they were looking for.
For giggles, I decided to get a Cartography Mod to see what areas my Ranger, who is at STUCK at 98.4% in Tyria mind you, missed. Well needless to say I was pissed off at all the little crappy areas that made up for it. What BS! I plan to get the rest of the mods now, because obviously scrapping and going slow through areas sometimes doesn't get it done by itself.
Will it tarnish the title when I do get 100%? Absolutely not. As was stated. A player still has to devote a certain amount of gameplay to getting the title.
So get off your high horse and find something truly meaningful in life to moan about.
So are people cheating at life when they use Mapquest or Google Earth to look for directions to get somewhere? I see.....Their experience would be much more self gratifying if they just wandered around town until they found the address they were looking for.
For giggles, I decided to get a Cartography Mod to see what areas my Ranger, who is at STUCK at 98.4% in Tyria mind you, missed. Well needless to say I was pissed off at all the little crappy areas that made up for it. What BS! I plan to get the rest of the mods now, because obviously scrapping and going slow through areas sometimes doesn't get it done by itself.
Will it tarnish the title when I do get 100%? Absolutely not. As was stated. A player still has to devote a certain amount of gameplay to getting the title.
So get off your high horse and find something truly meaningful in life to moan about.
coil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torqual
So no actual skill involved.
|
Rider
I usually don't post much around here... Generally just lurk around and see what is happing and let sykoone tell me when something else is going on... But I have to say that this has been an amusing thread to watch.
I don't think any of us realized when we created this mod that it would generate this kind of topic. It's beyond me how it could be considered cheating as all it does is make mapping easier for others. They still have to physically go out and do it themselves. I also don't see how it could possibly make someone who did it the hard way feel cheated.
Yes I am the mapper for the Cartography Made Easy mods. The mod didn't exist when I went through any of the campaigns. At times I wish it had, but it didn't. I had to do it the hard way. Yes I have LGMC and I am proud of it. I have a guild member who used it and is still just as proud to have his title as I am. Both of us had to go out and do the work... He only got the option of seeing where he needed to go. Yes I know there are spots that I missed... That shows just how much variance there is in the mapping system.
Am I worried about what others think of me for giving people an easier way to do it? Not at all. All this has done is generate alot of publicity for the mod and brought it to the attention of Gaile Gray. We all know ANET's stand on things like this as it has been pointed to numerous times. Am I worried about what they think about it... Not at all... although I am curious to see what or if they make any other comments about it.
Would I do it again if it wasn't already done ? You bet. I have been playing this game since it first came out and still enjoy it today, and will be updating the others as soon as the holiday event is over. We started this whole mod to help guildies and decided to release it so others could enjoy it as well. Not everyone will use it...Not everyone will like it...It doesn't give anyone any unfair advantages like other mods do which I won't discuss, so I don't see why anyone needs to worry about it so much...
Also just a side note... One of the developers of these mods still does not have any of his cartography titles done. He isn't worried about getting it.
Just have fun... get along... don't worry about what others do or think if it doesn't affect you. Makes the game a whole lot more enjoyable.
IGN: Rider Of Storms
I don't think any of us realized when we created this mod that it would generate this kind of topic. It's beyond me how it could be considered cheating as all it does is make mapping easier for others. They still have to physically go out and do it themselves. I also don't see how it could possibly make someone who did it the hard way feel cheated.
Yes I am the mapper for the Cartography Made Easy mods. The mod didn't exist when I went through any of the campaigns. At times I wish it had, but it didn't. I had to do it the hard way. Yes I have LGMC and I am proud of it. I have a guild member who used it and is still just as proud to have his title as I am. Both of us had to go out and do the work... He only got the option of seeing where he needed to go. Yes I know there are spots that I missed... That shows just how much variance there is in the mapping system.
Am I worried about what others think of me for giving people an easier way to do it? Not at all. All this has done is generate alot of publicity for the mod and brought it to the attention of Gaile Gray. We all know ANET's stand on things like this as it has been pointed to numerous times. Am I worried about what they think about it... Not at all... although I am curious to see what or if they make any other comments about it.
Would I do it again if it wasn't already done ? You bet. I have been playing this game since it first came out and still enjoy it today, and will be updating the others as soon as the holiday event is over. We started this whole mod to help guildies and decided to release it so others could enjoy it as well. Not everyone will use it...Not everyone will like it...It doesn't give anyone any unfair advantages like other mods do which I won't discuss, so I don't see why anyone needs to worry about it so much...
Also just a side note... One of the developers of these mods still does not have any of his cartography titles done. He isn't worried about getting it.
Just have fun... get along... don't worry about what others do or think if it doesn't affect you. Makes the game a whole lot more enjoyable.
IGN: Rider Of Storms
pumpkin pie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again
First off, it's not a piece of programming at all. It's nothing more than an image file. Saying "it's a piece of programming" will give people the assumption that this is some sort of bot - which it is not.
|
If that is correct, it is programming. and a bot that finds un-mapped area on your map.
Karyuu
It's a replacement for your fog - that fog exists in the GW client, and all the map mod does is make it easier to see.
It's no programming.
It's no programming.
pumpkin pie
what about the finding and marking of the spot that you couldn't find?
besides we already have a un-fog map U
besides we already have a un-fog map U
Karyuu
I don't really understand what you're pointing out, sorry in advance if it takes a while to get through to me :P Finding and marking of the spots you couldn't find? How so? All it does is change the color of the fog, and show stronger outlines around the fog borders.
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
what about the finding and marking of the spot that you couldn't find?
|
No. The only thing that these mods are doing is replacing images (hench Texmod.)
Amon Warrior
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rider
Yes I am the mapper for the Cartography Made Easy mods.
|
Well, got only one thing to say to you...
Thanks a lot man!
pumpkin pie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karyuu
I don't really understand what you're pointing out, sorry in advance if it takes a while to get through to me :P Finding and marking of the spots you couldn't find? How so? All it does is change the color of the fog, and show stronger outlines around the fog borders.
|
Karyuu: see this picture
what is that square beneath The Wild? is it mark places that you've not been to before?
Karyuu
Like I said, it changes the color of your fog. That square still exists without Texmod using the default fog color.
Skye Marin
Basically, before textmod, folks used reference maps. Before then, a few folks just did it.
Using the textmod mod is no more cheating than using a reference map and photoshop to flip between pictures. It's just a whole lot easier. I'm convinced that the first few folks who did cartographer shared reference maps with each other to get the full picture.
Bottom line is, I did Cantha and Elona with the flip-map method, and now that I've taken the plunge with the textmod solution for my last 5% of Tyria, I won't be going back.
Using the textmod mod is no more cheating than using a reference map and photoshop to flip between pictures. It's just a whole lot easier. I'm convinced that the first few folks who did cartographer shared reference maps with each other to get the full picture.
Bottom line is, I did Cantha and Elona with the flip-map method, and now that I've taken the plunge with the textmod solution for my last 5% of Tyria, I won't be going back.
CyberNigma
yeah if they actively go after soemthing like this then they may as well go after the wikis as well. They're ultimately gamers themselves which means there's probably an elitist mindset in there as well which will become prevalent (oh wait, that makes it easier, let's get it). I haven't used it, got my carts and I don't care if people use it. In fact, if people don't have to hunt for it then so much the better. The thing is, when real cartographers went out mapping, they didn't have to go run up against a wall for a little piece to pop out (I'm talking real life), they just went to the areas they could and mapped it. Believe me also that when you're in-game, if you're just wanting to show it off, then it's not a prestigious title. Be prepared for the tons of 'play the game' and 'no life' comments that you will get.
The better solution would be to make the blocks that are revealed larger than they are now so that characters would have to still go into all the areas of the map, but without the idiotic 'hugging the wall' to get a few pixels to pop. I swear. Much of what ANet does is pretty good, but some of the other hairbrained things make me think they left Blizzard before they flopped out (founder being the exception).
The better solution would be to make the blocks that are revealed larger than they are now so that characters would have to still go into all the areas of the map, but without the idiotic 'hugging the wall' to get a few pixels to pop. I swear. Much of what ANet does is pretty good, but some of the other hairbrained things make me think they left Blizzard before they flopped out (founder being the exception).
ReiNaruto
Why do we all continue arguing about this?
The op just want to be the only one that have the title, he want to be superior. That's find with me, I'm not shouting people that uses GW to know how to defeat Shiro, despite I did kill him before any suggestions was made, and you must believe me it was hard.
And, this is not going to anywhere, people that think that it is ok will continue thinking their way, the same for the opposite ones. Also, as Gayle has said, she doubt that anything will be done in GW1.
The op just want to be the only one that have the title, he want to be superior. That's find with me, I'm not shouting people that uses GW to know how to defeat Shiro, despite I did kill him before any suggestions was made, and you must believe me it was hard.
And, this is not going to anywhere, people that think that it is ok will continue thinking their way, the same for the opposite ones. Also, as Gayle has said, she doubt that anything will be done in GW1.
CHunterX
Quote:
Originally Posted by elektra_lucia
Can you politely tell me how it is legit? Considering it effects the time it will take, and MMORPG's are about time.
Keep in mind that I am not saying: Wiki is fair. |
Surena
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy untouchable
QQ more...good god folks, you are just pissed b/c someone did there title a easyer way....Who cares. it dosnt have any affect on how you play. this reminds me of the "OMG they are killing the rares" Your E-peen is smaller because someone else did something the easyer way. "but i bowled a strike with my eyed closed" "why cant everyone bowl with there eyes closed" "those guys with both eyes open got a strike in only 8 trys" "it took me 56 trys" "wah" "ban them from the bowling alley"
/rant off |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karyuu
To who? I don't care if you got Legendary Cartographer. I also don't care if you got God Walking Amongst Mere Mortals. I care if I get those titles, and you should care if you get those titles. But don't try to make me care about what you did or didn't do, and how much effort you did or did not put into something.
|
It's astonishing how people focus their character's development on the achievement of others. It's the same people that buy FoW, rare weapons, not because they like it but to impress and show off.
VitisVinifera
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
But I think the point is, the mod does change things, dramatically! I do not see the OP "belittling" someone. I see him expressing concern that suddenly those achievements that had one level of requirement are substantially easier to obtain. If someone wanders around trying to get that last .03%, that's entirely different than if someone can fire up the mod, jump to the map, and complete the final percentage in a matter of minutes.
Torqual, I understand your concerns, and this thread will be included in this week's community summary. I honestly don't expect that the game will be altered to revert the newly-changed parameters back to what they once were. But I will pass along how you feel about it, principally for future consideration. |
Gaile Gray
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hott Bill
So the all over question implied here is: Is this cheating or not? Plain and simple
|
Here's the wiki post that may help. (It is linked to materials that are months old, so don't mind the commentary above -- those issues are fully resolved.)
But I do understand that the larger issue is the question of whether the use of the mod in this instance is acceptable. A title once took months and a lot of ingenuity to acquire. Now, it can be obtained with virtually zero ingenuity (other than finding the mod and installing it ) and in a matter of days. Does that concern us? Would we ban someone who "exploited" the game in that manner? I honestly don't think so, but I truly do not know.
I have sent an email to Mike O'Brien asking him specifically about this. Again, I don't think that anyone needs to be overly concerned about this, but for your peace of mind, I will inquire and get back to you with the answer to this particular question.
Please understand that this thread did not "stir the pot" or cause us to place any undue attention on this question, or on modding as a whole. There is some rather heated commentary directed at the OP, where in fact his question is both practical and philosophical, and is nothing about which we were previously unaware. Also, it didn't cause a focus, or the arming of some sort of "ban gun" or "nerf bat."