[Dev Update] Exploits and Bans – 10 January 2008
The Great Al
Also, if it does come out that there was no hacking involved, I hope Gaile doesn't get flamed for this. She obviously didn't make up that answer for us, if anything, one of the programmers/managers told her to tell us that. She wouldn't just intentionally lie to us, in all seriousness.
blakecraw
I haven't read the whole thread here so ignore this if I'm repeating things but:
I think anet needs to prove to the community that this originated from a client hack, not a glitch, to differentiate it from the outpost ferrying bugs that have been abused in the past (the fact that anet's staff couldn't get to the outpost without hacking doesn't prove anything; being unable to prove that somebody died of natural causes does not mean they were murdered). If the discovery of this mystery outpost did originate from a legitimate hack, then it is not the same as the other ferrying that has happened, and therefore anet is not using any double standard by only banning people involved in this, so nobody has any right to complain about inconsistent ban practices, which is a weak argument anyway.
If this did somehow begin as a game bug, not a hack, then anet has a dilemma: they probably can't find everybody who exploited other various map-travel glitches, so they can't ban all of them (and from the sound of it that is a large portion of the community, and banning that many people would probably not have a good impact on gameplay anyway), and they can't morally justify unbanning these 117 people who were caught knowingly exploiting a bug (assuming it was a bug of course, not a hack) for personal gain. So, since anet looks bad no matter how they respond if this was not a hack, of course they are going to say it was a hack; therefore I for one do not trust their word that this was indeed a hack, until they prove it.
just my thoughts on how to clear this up
I think anet needs to prove to the community that this originated from a client hack, not a glitch, to differentiate it from the outpost ferrying bugs that have been abused in the past (the fact that anet's staff couldn't get to the outpost without hacking doesn't prove anything; being unable to prove that somebody died of natural causes does not mean they were murdered). If the discovery of this mystery outpost did originate from a legitimate hack, then it is not the same as the other ferrying that has happened, and therefore anet is not using any double standard by only banning people involved in this, so nobody has any right to complain about inconsistent ban practices, which is a weak argument anyway.
If this did somehow begin as a game bug, not a hack, then anet has a dilemma: they probably can't find everybody who exploited other various map-travel glitches, so they can't ban all of them (and from the sound of it that is a large portion of the community, and banning that many people would probably not have a good impact on gameplay anyway), and they can't morally justify unbanning these 117 people who were caught knowingly exploiting a bug (assuming it was a bug of course, not a hack) for personal gain. So, since anet looks bad no matter how they respond if this was not a hack, of course they are going to say it was a hack; therefore I for one do not trust their word that this was indeed a hack, until they prove it.
just my thoughts on how to clear this up
Zehnchu
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcanemacabre
Jut got on, scanned through the thread, and I have to say: if "truzo 117" is telling the truth on how it was done, I disagree with the bans. If it's true, this was not a hack, and while it was an exploit, I don't see this as being serious enough for banning. This doesn't come anywhere close to ruining the economy like the dupe exploit. But I don't know. If it really did involve hacking of anykind - let the banhammer drop hard.
|
First even if by some fluke that mapping back to your guild hall then mapping as to go back to DOA you ended up in the hidden test outpost only for devs.
The problem is that once you left you would not be able to get back there again, unless you can duplicate that fluke again (or altered your client so you can gain access to the area). But at that point it wouldn’t really be worth it.
Which leaves you with the fact that these people took advantage of an exploit that allowed characters to be parked in this outpost (much like urgoz/deep) then with those parked people they would ferry a select few to this outpost then change characters (be ferried in themselves) and go from there. And not have to fight the other 4 bosses and only have to fight one to get the quest rewards or end rewards. So it really doesn’t matter about the outpost even if the case it was accessible by chance. It’s the actions of the 117 people who exploited this outpost after they gained accessed to it.
I think a lot of people here have a good understanding on the fact that the banned people accepted the quest then got or ferried people into the outpost killed the end boss skipping the other four and did this over and over again at the same time getting the end rewards.
Jake_Steel
Anet doesn't need or even have to prove to some people on a message board that it was hack.
They believe(know) it was hack, they can act accordingly. It's there server (such is the case in ALL online game btw) and they can whenever and however they see fit.
They believe(know) it was hack, they can act accordingly. It's there server (such is the case in ALL online game btw) and they can whenever and however they see fit.
Harrier's haste
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakecraw
I haven't read the whole thread here so ignore this if I'm repeating things but:
I think anet needs to prove to the community that this originated from a client hack, not a glitch, to differentiate it from the outpost ferrying bugs that have been abused in the past (the fact that anet's staff couldn't get to the outpost without hacking doesn't prove anything; being unable to prove that somebody died of natural causes does not mean they were murdered). If the discovery of this mystery outpost did originate from a legitimate hack, then it is not the same as the other ferrying that has happened, and therefore anet is not using any double standard by only banning people involved in this, so nobody has any right to complain about inconsistent ban practices, which is a weak argument anyway. If this did somehow begin as a game bug, not a hack, then anet has a dilemma: they probably can't find everybody who exploited other various map-travel glitches, so they can't ban all of them (and from the sound of it that is a large portion of the community, and banning that many people would probably not have a good impact on gameplay anyway), and they can't morally justify unbanning these 117 people who were caught knowingly exploiting a bug (assuming it was a bug of course, not a hack) for personal gain. So, since anet looks bad no matter how they respond if this was not a hack, of course they are going to say it was a hack; therefore I for one do not trust their word that this was indeed a hack, until they prove it. just my thoughts on how to clear this up |
But how though? Make a video of it and put it on Youtube or Veoh?
garethporlest18
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrk247
Well if it really did take all those steps for this to work when would you stop and realise it wasn't how the game was supposed to be played?
Says clearly in the EULA that you will be banned if you exploit the game. I don't agree with a mass perma banning but if you knew what you were doing was exploiting the game stop QQing and learn your lesson. |
DivineEnvoy
Out of curiousity, how many of you, who are banned at the moment, would ever go to DoA again if you are unbanned?
Kayu Ishida
What was supposed to be a simple solution to an alleged problem has now evolved into something much more sever. For over the past 24 hours I’ve been hearing near to nothing, save hate and garbage, being spewed all across this thread, and any sort of light that is shone upon the masses has been beaten down by ignorance and insults. Enough is enough, and this is all I can take before exploding into a wave of frustration, disappointment, and utter distress.
I cannot stress enough how ludicrous it is to think that all the infamous 117 are greedy, evil, unforgivable hackers whose sole purpose was to exploit a programming error until all their selfish needs were satisfied while all other members of the Guild Wars gaming community were abandoned in the depths of an economic crash. Does that description sound over exaggerated and harsh? Well, anyone who knows the truth will be forced to agree on the fact that it is an inaccurate perception of the real situation, a situation that only Arena Net and the 117 know the truth behind. I ask you, why are the 117 being accused of such atrocities when there was never any hard, solid proof presented to the public that they were really guilty of the crimes they supposedly committed?
A veil of imprecision shrouds the definitions of “exploiting” and “cheating”, and now should we add “hacking”? I have had the honor of personally knowing a handful of the 117, and I will not be the first to admit that they are not hackers. In fact, they are so far from hackers, one of them can’t even set up Outlook. Does that sound like a hacker to you? None of them know what .dat files are. Are they still hackers? It is despicable when someone is wrongfully accused of being something they are not, and then the majority of the community exiles the accused and kicks them when they are down and stone then until they bleed. When did we all become liable judges? What justification exists that gives us the right to insult and spell out the fate of the defendants?
The definite lines between justice and discrimination are now blurred. Who is wrong? Who is right? The people that are not members of the two parties will never know the real truth, so let’s stop fooling each other. Arena Net is not telling the truth, and the 117 are not telling the truth… so where will this arguing get us?
The greatest lose that every single one of us will suffer from is trust. Those who were banned will never trust Arena Net again. Those who befriended the 117 will never trust Arena Net again. Those who felt they were cheated by the 117 will never trust the players Arena Net shuns from Guild Wars again. Those who stumble across future glitches will never feel comfortable reporting the instance, because can you truly invest a full amount of trust in the fact that you won’t be banned for accidently exploiting a glitch? Will you ever trust someone who says to you “Let’s go farm so-and-so! There’s an easy way to do it” without fearing you’re exploiting the game? Where does your trust waver now, or better yet has your trust in anything even faltered? If not, then leave the emotions to those who have felt the impact behind the bans.
I am sorry, Miss Grey, that you were the messenger who was selected to be the bearer of bad news. Being the face of Arena Net, your task was to retell the story the developers and the suits instructed you to relate to the public. I hope you will be able to sleep at night knowing that it’s your job to say what you are supposed to say, while knowing the truth is behind closed doors. No one will believe my friends because of the label you and your co-workers have placed on them. The perfect word was already used to describe the feeling that your accusations have wrought: demoralizing. It really is the perfect word, agreed?
I’ve grown tired of all of this. I want my friends back. I want them to have their dignity back. What right do you have to deny them of that? So you think they cheated you in a game? Big deal. Their reputation is ruined because of this nonsense, and that is much harder to fix than an imagined economy. My friends have been nothing but kind, helpful, and generous to countless gamers, and this is how they are repaid? Would you like to know a fact, a truth behind the handful of the 117 I know? They are great friends and have shown great amounts of character in this dark and unjust situation. That is more than I can say about several of the people who have posted here. Be ashamed, be very ashamed that you can judge people you don’t know and feel completely comfortable with yourselves...
Now I am ashamed of myself for ranting when I am completely tired and not in the best state of mind. Most sorry to those who has nothing to do with my peeves, and to all gamers out there, good luck to you.
I cannot stress enough how ludicrous it is to think that all the infamous 117 are greedy, evil, unforgivable hackers whose sole purpose was to exploit a programming error until all their selfish needs were satisfied while all other members of the Guild Wars gaming community were abandoned in the depths of an economic crash. Does that description sound over exaggerated and harsh? Well, anyone who knows the truth will be forced to agree on the fact that it is an inaccurate perception of the real situation, a situation that only Arena Net and the 117 know the truth behind. I ask you, why are the 117 being accused of such atrocities when there was never any hard, solid proof presented to the public that they were really guilty of the crimes they supposedly committed?
A veil of imprecision shrouds the definitions of “exploiting” and “cheating”, and now should we add “hacking”? I have had the honor of personally knowing a handful of the 117, and I will not be the first to admit that they are not hackers. In fact, they are so far from hackers, one of them can’t even set up Outlook. Does that sound like a hacker to you? None of them know what .dat files are. Are they still hackers? It is despicable when someone is wrongfully accused of being something they are not, and then the majority of the community exiles the accused and kicks them when they are down and stone then until they bleed. When did we all become liable judges? What justification exists that gives us the right to insult and spell out the fate of the defendants?
The definite lines between justice and discrimination are now blurred. Who is wrong? Who is right? The people that are not members of the two parties will never know the real truth, so let’s stop fooling each other. Arena Net is not telling the truth, and the 117 are not telling the truth… so where will this arguing get us?
The greatest lose that every single one of us will suffer from is trust. Those who were banned will never trust Arena Net again. Those who befriended the 117 will never trust Arena Net again. Those who felt they were cheated by the 117 will never trust the players Arena Net shuns from Guild Wars again. Those who stumble across future glitches will never feel comfortable reporting the instance, because can you truly invest a full amount of trust in the fact that you won’t be banned for accidently exploiting a glitch? Will you ever trust someone who says to you “Let’s go farm so-and-so! There’s an easy way to do it” without fearing you’re exploiting the game? Where does your trust waver now, or better yet has your trust in anything even faltered? If not, then leave the emotions to those who have felt the impact behind the bans.
I am sorry, Miss Grey, that you were the messenger who was selected to be the bearer of bad news. Being the face of Arena Net, your task was to retell the story the developers and the suits instructed you to relate to the public. I hope you will be able to sleep at night knowing that it’s your job to say what you are supposed to say, while knowing the truth is behind closed doors. No one will believe my friends because of the label you and your co-workers have placed on them. The perfect word was already used to describe the feeling that your accusations have wrought: demoralizing. It really is the perfect word, agreed?
I’ve grown tired of all of this. I want my friends back. I want them to have their dignity back. What right do you have to deny them of that? So you think they cheated you in a game? Big deal. Their reputation is ruined because of this nonsense, and that is much harder to fix than an imagined economy. My friends have been nothing but kind, helpful, and generous to countless gamers, and this is how they are repaid? Would you like to know a fact, a truth behind the handful of the 117 I know? They are great friends and have shown great amounts of character in this dark and unjust situation. That is more than I can say about several of the people who have posted here. Be ashamed, be very ashamed that you can judge people you don’t know and feel completely comfortable with yourselves...
Now I am ashamed of myself for ranting when I am completely tired and not in the best state of mind. Most sorry to those who has nothing to do with my peeves, and to all gamers out there, good luck to you.
GloryFox
Quote:
I haven't read the whole thread here so ignore this if I'm repeating things but: I think anet needs to prove to the community that this originated from a client hack, not a glitch, to differentiate it from the outpost ferrying bugs that have been abused in the past (the fact that anet's staff couldn't get to the outpost without hacking doesn't prove anything; being unable to prove that somebody died of natural causes does not mean they were murdered). If the discovery of this mystery outpost did originate from a legitimate hack, then it is not the same as the other ferrying that has happened, and therefore anet is not using any double standard by only banning people involved in this, so nobody has any right to complain about inconsistent ban practices, which is a weak argument anyway. If this did somehow begin as a game bug, not a hack, then anet has a dilemma: they probably can't find everybody who exploited other various map-travel glitches, so they can't ban all of them (and from the sound of it that is a large portion of the community, and banning that many people would probably not have a good impact on gameplay anyway), and they can't morally justify unbanning these 117 people who were caught knowingly exploiting a bug (assuming it was a bug of course, not a hack) for personal gain. So, since anet looks bad no matter how they respond if this was not a hack, of course they are going to say it was a hack; therefore I for one do not trust their word that this was indeed a hack, until they prove it. just my thoughts on how to clear this up |
Therefore the key to not getting a BAN is to not do anything that draws their attention in a negative fashion. THIS IS COMMON SENSE!!!
They have a RIGHT to refuse service to anyone for any reason. It's on the ALL RIGHTS RESERVED clause.
Quote:
quoted by the EULA sections 3 & 14 3. LICENSE TO USE Subject to the terms of this Agreement, NC Interactive grants to you, for your personal use only, a non-exclusive, revocable, nontransferable (except as permitted in Section 4(a)) license to use the Service, and a non-exclusive, revocable, nontransferable (except as permitted in Section 4(a)) license to use the Software in connection with the Service, without charge except for new Campaigns and Additional Features which will be charged on a prepaid basis according to Section 5. You may not (a) sublicense, rent, lease, loan or otherwise transfer the Software or the Service (or any part thereof), including without limitation access keys; (b) modify, adapt, reverse engineer or decompile the Software, or otherwise attempt to derive source code from the Software; (c) create any derivative works in respect of the Software or the Service; or (d) otherwise use the Software or the Service except as expressly provided in this Agreement. You should keep your access key in a safe place and not share it with anyone else. The access key can be used only once. Title to the Software, and all rights with respect to the Software and Service not specifically granted under this Agreement, including without limitation all rights of reproduction, modification, distribution, display, disassembly and decompilation and all copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret and other proprietary rights and interests are reserved to NC Interactive. 14. TERMINATION (a) NC Interactive reserves the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement (including your Software license and your Account) immediately and without notice if you breach this Agreement or willfully infringe any third party intellectual property rights, or if we are unable to verify or authenticate any information you provide to us, or upon game play, chat or any player activity whatsoever which is, in our sole discretion, inappropriate and/or in violation of the spirit of the Game(s) as described in the Rules of Conduct. Should NC Interactive decide to suspend or terminate this Agreement with a User under any circumstances, the User will lose access to your Account. (b) You agree that if the Service or your Account is suspended, terminated or cancelled for any reason or length of time, you are not entitled to any reimbursement or refund of any fees or unused access time. |
If you annoy ANET they can and will ban you. Deal with life it happens then move on. Meanwhile I'm enjoying my Guild Wars even more knowing that 117 trouble makers are GONE.
The community has been satisfied.
blakecraw
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake_Steel
Anet doesn't need or even have to prove to some people on a message board that it was hack.
They believe(know) it was hack, they can act accordingly. It's there server (such is the case in ALL online game btw) and they can whenever and however they see fit. |
jezz
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcanemacabre
Jut got on, scanned through the thread, and I have to say: if "truzo 117" is telling the truth on how it was done, I disagree with the bans. If it's true, this was not a hack, and while it was an exploit, I don't see this as being serious enough for banning. This doesn't come anywhere close to ruining the economy like the dupe exploit. But I don't know. If it really did involve hacking of anykind - let the banhammer drop hard.
|
IF truzo 117 is telling complete truth. perma ban maybe too harsh..IMO
jrk247
Quote:
Originally Posted by garethporlest18
The point of the matter is, if these guys are going to stay banned, then ANet better own up and ban everyone who's ever used an exploit in this game. Because it's against the EULA. Duncan/Guild Ferrying, all against the EULA.
|
untitled2005
Instead of a permanent ban, how about wiping everything clean from the offenders and stuffing all their storage and character slots with gemstones that cannot be traded, sold or deleted? Everyone would be happy then.
Creeping Carl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
I cannot stress enough how ludicrous it is to think that all the infamous 117 are greedy, evil, unforgivable hackers whose sole purpose was to exploit a programming error until all their selfish needs were satisfied while all other members of the Guild Wars gaming community were abandoned in the depths of an economic crash.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
Does that description sound over exaggerated and harsh?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
Well, anyone who knows the truth will be forced to agree on the fact that it is an inaccurate perception of the real situation, a situation that only Arena Net and the 117 know the truth behind. I ask you, why are the 117 being accused of such atrocities when there was never any hard, solid proof presented to the public that they were really guilty of the crimes they supposedly committed?
|
Drop of Fear
good morning dear.
Hack or not, u kept it secret for months to exploit it as much as u could knowing it was a critical exploit.
Play with words as u like, post as many pages of rants u believe is appropriate, honest players will keep thanking anet for their effort to protect the game they love from greedy people who exploit it in every possible way they can.
Rant some more, then turn off your monitor, clean your brain from all the crap and ask youself " did i deserve it ?"
If the answer is "yes" then stop posting crap here and either get another copy of gw and play honestly or leave the game.
If the answer is "no" then accept that a.net has the rights to take all the actions to protect their gaming environment.
Hack or not, u kept it secret for months to exploit it as much as u could knowing it was a critical exploit.
Play with words as u like, post as many pages of rants u believe is appropriate, honest players will keep thanking anet for their effort to protect the game they love from greedy people who exploit it in every possible way they can.
Rant some more, then turn off your monitor, clean your brain from all the crap and ask youself " did i deserve it ?"
If the answer is "yes" then stop posting crap here and either get another copy of gw and play honestly or leave the game.
If the answer is "no" then accept that a.net has the rights to take all the actions to protect their gaming environment.
GloryFox
The difference between this situation and Duncan is very clear. With Duncan one could easily assume that it was a necessary function to allow players who had not beat the previous missions allowance into the final Duncan mission for the purpose of forming a party with ease for those who did beat the previous 4 areas. It was as is when the game was released therefore one could argue that it was intended. Everyone in the game still started at the same town location available to everyone else and it was not a secret etc.
In the case of Mallyx you had access to a town that was not even located properly on the map. You could not simply travel there. You cheated the starting point that was not available to everyone else. You skipped the path and went end game. You then exploited this easy access for personal gain, wealth and prestige breaking the spirit of the game. Completed the mission then rinse repeated entering a mission only available to you and your chosen few. This is not the same as Duncan as much as you want it to be. Your lying to yourself and others.
Thank GOD that ANet has chosen to re set everyone to ground zero with GW2. Where honest players have a chance vs. the corrupt and the sneaky.
In the case of Mallyx you had access to a town that was not even located properly on the map. You could not simply travel there. You cheated the starting point that was not available to everyone else. You skipped the path and went end game. You then exploited this easy access for personal gain, wealth and prestige breaking the spirit of the game. Completed the mission then rinse repeated entering a mission only available to you and your chosen few. This is not the same as Duncan as much as you want it to be. Your lying to yourself and others.
Thank GOD that ANet has chosen to re set everyone to ground zero with GW2. Where honest players have a chance vs. the corrupt and the sneaky.
Meta4ik
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryFox
The difference between this situation and Duncan is very clear. With Duncan one could easily assume that it was a necessary function to allow players who had not beat the previous missions allowance into the final Duncan mission for the purpose of forming a party with ease for those who did beat the previous 4 areas. It was as is when the game was released therefore one could argue that it was intended. Everyone in the game still started at the same town location available to everyone else and it was not a secret etc.
In the case of Mallyx you had access to a town that was not even located properly on the map. You could not simply travel there. You cheated the starting point that was not available to everyone else. You skipped the path and went end game. You then exploited this easy access for personal gain, wealth and prestige breaking the spirit of the game. Completed the mission then rinse repeated entering a mission only available to you and your chosen few. This is not the same as Duncan as much as you want it to be. Your lying to yourself and others. Thank GOD that ANet has chosen to re set everyone to ground zero with GW2. Where honest players have a chance vs. the corrupt and the sneaky. |
You can't see me
There's only one thing that needs to be said here.
Anyone who has done DoA before at least once should have the common sense to see that the exploit was not of normal playstyle and can therefore logcially assume it was a bug. It's no big secret that bug abuse is against the terms Arenanet made you agree to before using an account in their ownership. Anyone who say this should have left the game instead of staying to complete the exploit. They all know that bug abuse is against the rules, and it wouldn't have been very hard to figure out that an outpost not located on the map is a bug. They knowingly violated the terms of use, and recieved fair punishment in the eyes of Arenanet.
And don't go on saying "They didn't know". Come on, seriously, if you don't have the sense to recognize that skipping areas and going to a hidden outpost is a bug, then I would think that you would have been banned ages ago for not knowing that using third party programs is against the rules, even with the notice on the login screen. This isn't handing out bans at random. This is punishing those who violated the terms of use. If you want to harp on Arenanet for that, then you can do it all you want, but the fact is, they had every right, rhyme and reason to ban anyone involved who did not leave the game or was not on thier first time, which I doubt anyone was or did.
Anyone who has done DoA before at least once should have the common sense to see that the exploit was not of normal playstyle and can therefore logcially assume it was a bug. It's no big secret that bug abuse is against the terms Arenanet made you agree to before using an account in their ownership. Anyone who say this should have left the game instead of staying to complete the exploit. They all know that bug abuse is against the rules, and it wouldn't have been very hard to figure out that an outpost not located on the map is a bug. They knowingly violated the terms of use, and recieved fair punishment in the eyes of Arenanet.
And don't go on saying "They didn't know". Come on, seriously, if you don't have the sense to recognize that skipping areas and going to a hidden outpost is a bug, then I would think that you would have been banned ages ago for not knowing that using third party programs is against the rules, even with the notice on the login screen. This isn't handing out bans at random. This is punishing those who violated the terms of use. If you want to harp on Arenanet for that, then you can do it all you want, but the fact is, they had every right, rhyme and reason to ban anyone involved who did not leave the game or was not on thier first time, which I doubt anyone was or did.
jeesuss89
Quote:
Originally Posted by You can't see me
And don't go on saying "They didn't know". Come on, seriously, if you don't have the sense to recognize that skipping three areas and going to a hidden outpost is a bug, then I would think that you would have been banned ages ago for not knowing that using third party programs is against the rules, even with the notice on the login screen.
|
You can't see me
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
Three areas, huh??? Well, I guess one person doesn't know...
|
Regardless, it makes no point expressed in the above invalid, if I did or did not intend to say that.
jeesuss89
For god's sake people, this has nothing to do with real-life situations, WoW, hacks or whatever. You people are insulting every single one of the 117, dubbing them ALL hackers. Every single one of you who have NO IDEA what happened should stfu. You know nothing. NOTHING. Sure, one or two may have hacked, but for the other 115-116, put yourself in there shoes;
Someone PM's you. "Wanna do Mallyx???"
You: "Sure"
Someone: "Have you done the 4 areas before???"
You: "Yeah"
--- After Mallyx ---
You: "Thanks for the run"
Someone: "Wanna do it again???"
You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas"
Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down"
You: "Kk"
Do NOT BS and say you wouldn't consider it. Maybe not do it, but you would definately consider it. One/two people you can address as hacks, but for the rest who were given an opportunity to make maybe 20k every 30mins.
My only regret is being oblivious and naive.
Someone PM's you. "Wanna do Mallyx???"
You: "Sure"
Someone: "Have you done the 4 areas before???"
You: "Yeah"
--- After Mallyx ---
You: "Thanks for the run"
Someone: "Wanna do it again???"
You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas"
Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down"
You: "Kk"
Do NOT BS and say you wouldn't consider it. Maybe not do it, but you would definately consider it. One/two people you can address as hacks, but for the rest who were given an opportunity to make maybe 20k every 30mins.
My only regret is being oblivious and naive.
You can't see me
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
For god's sake people, this has nothing to do with real-life situations, WoW, hacks or whatever. You people are insulting every single one of the 117, dubbing them ALL hackers. Every single one of you who have NO IDEA what happened should stfu. You know nothing. NOTHING. Sure, one or two may have hacked, but for the other 115-116, put yourself in there shoes;
Someone PM's you. "Wanna do Mallyx???" You: "Sure" Someone: "Have you done the 4 areas before???" You: "Yeah" --- After Mallyx --- You: "Thanks for the run" Someone: "Wanna do it again???" You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas" Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down" You: "Kk" Do NOT BS and say you wouldn't consider it. Maybe not do it, but you would definately consider it. One/two people you can address as hacks, but for the rest who were given an opportunity to make maybe 20k every 30mins. My only regret is being oblivious and naive. |
You cannot accuse people they would steal a quarter if it was lying on the ground but belonged to someone else. Your thesis is ignorant and makes no point in attempt to stereotype all people who may have been exposed but were not as people who would have considered exploiting the bug.
I'm going to bed. It's too late to deal with people's lack of common sense.
Horus Moonlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
I cannot stress enough how ludicrous it is to think that all the infamous 117 are greedy, evil, unforgivable hackers whose sole purpose was to exploit a programming error until all their selfish needs were satisfied while all other members of the Guild Wars gaming community were abandoned in the depths of an economic crash. Does that description sound over exaggerated and harsh? Well, anyone who knows the truth will be forced to agree on the fact that it is an inaccurate perception of the real situation, a situation that only Arena Net and the 117 know the truth behind. I ask you, why are the 117 being accused of such atrocities when there was never any hard, solid proof presented to the public that they were really guilty of the crimes they supposedly committed?
|
Now why would any and/or all the evidence pertaining to this issue need to be presented to the public? All it would accomplish would bring closure to the skeptics who believe A-Net is incompetent, deceiving, or both.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
A veil of imprecision shrouds the definitions of “exploiting” and “cheating”, and now should we add “hacking”? I have had the honor of personally knowing a handful of the 117, and I will not be the first to admit that they are not hackers. In fact, they are so far from hackers, one of them can’t even set up Outlook. Does that sound like a hacker to you? None of them know what .dat files are. Are they still hackers? It is despicable when someone is wrongfully accused of being something they are not, and then the majority of the community exiles the accused and kicks them when they are down and stone then until they bleed. When did we all become liable judges? What justification exists that gives us the right to insult and spell out the fate of the defendants?
|
Was that wrong of them to do so? Yes.
Was it against the EULA? Yes.
Should they get banned? Yes.
Is there a need to add insult to injury for those who were banned? Nope, but that does not mean that it isn't their prerogative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayu Ishida
The definite lines between justice and discrimination are now blurred. Who is wrong? Who is right? The people that are not members of the two parties will never know the real truth, so let’s stop fooling each other. Arena Net is not telling the truth, and the 117 are not telling the truth… so where will this arguing get us?
|
To those who were indeed banned unjustly, I wish you the best of luck in rectifying this.
vaxmor
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
You: "Uh, ok, I got time to do the 4 areas" Someone: "You don't need too. But keep it down" You: "Kk" |
Considering how much QQing is coming from 117 spl0iterz, I reckon ANet were far too LENIENT, I say: Permanent ban for anyone who was on any one of these 177s friend list, too~!
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
My point exactly. So please, I've had enough of people who weren't involved with this event. Either close the thread, or leave it to A-net and the 117.
|
jeesuss89
Trust me. The economy was not affected enough to cause a ban of the proportion. Are you saying that bots don't affect the economy enough and A-net doesn't need to do as much about it as the 117??? Please...
maraxusofk
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
Trust me. The economy was not affected enough to cause a ban of the proportion. Are you saying that bots don't affect the economy enough and A-net doesn't need to do as much about it as the 117??? Please...
|
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s....php?t=3043462
jeesuss89
They do, but once these bots make enough profit from that one account by acquiring enough in-game gold, sites sell this in-game funds raised by the bots, a-net then bans the account knowingly that the site will buy more accounts, making a win-win situation for both.
However, this has nothing to do with 117, so please, I don't want to repeat...
However, this has nothing to do with 117, so please, I don't want to repeat...
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
They do, but once these bots make enough profit from that one account by acquiring enough in-game gold, sites sell this in-game funds raised by the bots, a-net then bans the account knowingly that the site will buy more accounts, making a win-win situation for both.
|
Also, a large amount of bots come from stolen accounts. Whether it's "large amount" or "majority" I don't remember.
jeesuss89
That statement is contradictory.
You say its lose-lose??? How come these sites are still active???
And A-net still gets money for the accounts regardless where they're stolen from the original owner or not.
You say its lose-lose??? How come these sites are still active???
And A-net still gets money for the accounts regardless where they're stolen from the original owner or not.
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
You say its lose-lose??? How come these sites are still active???
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesuss89
And A-net still gets money for the accounts regardless where they're stolen from the original owner or not.
|
danshep
I was one of the unlucky ones i lost 2 accounts cos of this.
And btw the people who showed them this glitch also got banned.
wat galie gay said that no one got banned for visiting the area and that is lies cos i got banned for visiting it and so did alot of others.
And btw the people who showed them this glitch also got banned.
wat galie gay said that no one got banned for visiting the area and that is lies cos i got banned for visiting it and so did alot of others.
odly
I'm really annoyed at how people allways try to find the easy way out. Maybe you didn't all "hack" but you sure knew you were "cheating". You just hoped to get away with it. You might think you're not doing anything harmfull, but I allways find that how people act while playing a game they enjoy during their spare time is a pretty good show of their character.
The Great Ithqua
Quote:
Originally Posted by odly
I'm really annoyed at how people allways try to find the easy way out. Maybe you didn't all "hack" but you sure knew you were "cheating". You just hoped to get away with it. You might think you're not doing anything harmfull, but I allways find that how people act while playing a game they enjoy during their spare time is a pretty good show of their character.
|
Lord Sojar
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Great Ithqua
You will be surprised there are some that didnt know it was a bug, i was 1 of them.. believe it or not..its not like that area Says This is a bug area please leave -.-.. if it says that every1 will leave
|
turin9
I used the exploit and got banned, ya i suck. but the only problems i have are:
-No one got banned for the Guild Hall Travel Exploit, that allowed infinite number of chars to travel to anywhere in the game.
-No one got banned for the Slavers exploit, that killed the EOTN economy and completely dropped the prices of many "rare" skinned weapons, weeks after being introduced into the game
-When the big duping exploit happened not to long ago, hardly anyone besides the original ppl who discovered the duping method were banned, even though thousands profited off of it.
I dont care if they strip my account of everything, all my armor and weapons and money, i dont give a shit. i just want my monk back.
ive spent more late nights and been on more adventures with that lil guy.
and yes im f'ing crying about this, call me a QQer all u want.
im sry
i just want my Misera Cantra Mo/E back
-No one got banned for the Guild Hall Travel Exploit, that allowed infinite number of chars to travel to anywhere in the game.
-No one got banned for the Slavers exploit, that killed the EOTN economy and completely dropped the prices of many "rare" skinned weapons, weeks after being introduced into the game
-When the big duping exploit happened not to long ago, hardly anyone besides the original ppl who discovered the duping method were banned, even though thousands profited off of it.
I dont care if they strip my account of everything, all my armor and weapons and money, i dont give a shit. i just want my monk back.
ive spent more late nights and been on more adventures with that lil guy.
and yes im f'ing crying about this, call me a QQer all u want.
im sry
i just want my Misera Cantra Mo/E back
Lord Sojar
Quote:
Originally Posted by turin9
I used the exploit and got banned, ya i suck. but the only problems i have are:
-No one got banned for the Guild Hall Travel Exploit, that allowed infinite number of chars to travel to anywhere in the game. -No one got banned for the Slavers exploit, that killed the EOTN economy and completely dropped the prices of many "rare" skinned weapons, weeks after being introduced into the game -When the big duping exploit happened not to long ago, hardly anyone besides the original ppl who discovered the duping method were banned, even though thousands profited off of it. I dont care if they strip my account of everything, all my armor and weapons and money, i dont give a shit. i just want my monk back. ive spent more late nights and been on more adventures with that lil guy. and yes im f'ing crying about this, call me a QQer all u want. im sry i just want my Misera Cantra Mo/E back |
Did the people who took their level 4's to the Central Transfer Chamber makes bookoos of gems and gold? I think not...
Your guilty, as you stated. Get a new account and don't exploit this time. Simple as that.
And yes, I agree about the dupers. They should witch hunt the 1,000s of other players that performed dupes and ban the crap out of their accounts. I am NOT being sarcastic here, I am dead serious. 1500 armbrace bids my hairy ass!
Slaver's "Exploit" was more like a glitch that was built into the mechanics of the game. No one really realized it was an "exploit" until they told us it was. I used it, was a great way of making money. It still required a lot of effort to do though. The fix is half ass anyways. They should have made a more elegant fix for it, and I don't mean Soul Reaping elegant.
turin9
i honest to god didn't use the the mallyx exploit more than 10 times, cuz i only got one armbrace and had legitimately farmed the previous gems.
punish me by taking all my hard earned money and armor sets, but dont take my monk away from me, jesus
punish me by taking all my hard earned money and armor sets, but dont take my monk away from me, jesus
English Warrior
Why not unban the people and just have a reroll
turin9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
Did the people who took their level 4's to the Central Transfer Chamber makes bookoos of gems and gold? I think not...
|
ppl were selling trips to anywhere in the game for anywhere from 5k-50k
spamming it in LA, KC, Kamadan, and anywhere else they well plzed