Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
XDDDDD What a bad try! Seriously.
There was approaches to fix the system. One of them was the anti-farm code.
It was removed since LS was WAY better than it, and thus, replaced it.
Just remember that sometimes the solution for a problem, even know, can take a lot of time to be put in practice.
XDDDD Increase in price of weapons? XDDD No!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
or reduce the drop rates of most rare skins...
|
If you reduce the drop rates of rare skins, their price will increase. You are contradicting yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
I'm saying that I do not want GOLD to decrease in price. So I won't need to farm to buy something from other player. If you make farming work again fully, like it worked before the antifarm code, you will end up with less people having more gold. Ad thus, the value of the gold decrease, because those with more gold 'decide' the prices, being able to acquire more than others.
|
No. The one with more gold can only decide the price if he is the only one with access to the rare skins. Today, however, rare skins are dropping everywhere for everyone. Rich players can TRY to sell a Gothic Sword for 100K + ecto's, but everyone can just practically get them for free these days, so there is no need to give that much to a sword that everyone has and that drops everywhere. It's all about supply and demand. Hence weapons are worth nothing now even though stuff like Polar Bear is still 1000K+
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
You don't have to bother about it. Justs keep in mind the basics. Things like:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
- Farming not required to get things.
|
Farming is most definately required to get things in this game. The entire game is like one big goldsink. Except for the storyline, everything costs tons of money and without farming it's impossible to get it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
- Prices not decided by a minority of farmers.
|
This was never the case. It was the buyers that made the prices get to 100K + ecto's. It was not hard at all to get req 8 Long Swords for 5K back then. It's too bad that most people were ignorant and asked other people for prices and/or checked price-check topics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
- Parties of 8 people more effective to et wealth than solo players.
|
I agree on this. However parties of 8 people are not effective to gain wealth at all. If they just left out Loot Scaling and increased drop rate in 8-man parties, it would be much better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
- Rare items not affected.
|
I agree on this one. If rare items were affected, Hardcore farmers would get even richer, increasing the gap between Hardcore and Casual.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
- PlayerToPlayer trades with reasonable prices.
|
This has to do with Supply and Demand. In other words, if an item is farmed, it's price will decrease. In order to get a market with low prices, you have to make the item readily available. Like what happened to the Elemental Sword and Colossal Scimitar. I don't completely agree on this, however. The prices for these items shouldn't get too low, because if the market for them get's too full, it will become worthless and everyone will lose interest in the weapon, causing it to die out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
Increasing the value of identified items while reducing the values of non-identified ones would work WAY better for what you 'claim' to ask, instead removing LS.
But of course, that is not what you want.
Just removing LS means: Take those that do not farm out of the picture.
Nothing else.
|
However, there is nobody that doesn't farm. If there is, that person should not expect to get any vanity. I agree that stuff like keys and 15K armour should be earned, but at least give people the choice to work towards these things.