Quote:
Originally Posted by Avarre
Giving it an RaO-esque rebalance of dramatically adjusting recharge time and duration, either to make it unmaintainable (in which case, the ending penalty could be reduced or dropped), or impossible to maintain by normal energy recharge, would probably kill most complaints.
|
No, they've actually already done that. Without an essence, perma-SF results in a net loss of energy if you do anything to do damage (which you pretty much have to do with the damage nerf).
SF + DP + GoS = 30e in 22.5 sec (with max recharge reduction of 50%)
Assassins have 4 pips of e-regen, which is 4/3 e/sec, or exactly 30e in 22.5s.
Other than the high-end stuff (UW, etc...), it's generally not cost-effective to use an essence for most farms (which drops the cost to 20e every 22.5, leaving you with what is still a paltry amount of energy for damage. You still need a zealous scythe/daggers to keep at it, or spend a lot of downtime waiting for natural recharge)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ugh
K let's back up. I seem to have misunderstood some part of the past couple posts. Allow me to clarify my point.
Normal groups a.k.a. balanced groups, right? If not, be more clear in your posts. These do not happen in PUGs. Which, to me, is a normal group.
|
Normal groups = Not meta/gimmick groups, in the context that I used it (which was not directed at you). If you consider a PUG to be a normal group, then your definitions are flawed. As I said, a UW PUG group will always be either inexperienced, or meta.
Quote:
|
My alliance is pretty much purely social so no luck there. And don't tell me to find new friends or submit to UWSC because you would be contradicting your previous argument that one should not have to submit to another's mighty playstyle.
|
I wouldn't dream of telling you to find new friends or learn to UWSC. I will, however, ask you to stop bitching because YOU made a choice to join a social alliance instead of one that will play the game with you, and point out that that decision was yours and is NOT grounds for forcing others to change how they play.
Quote:
|
Just because something happens in your alliance, does not mean that it is practiced anywhere else. No alliance that I have ever been in has run balanced teams, so, from my experiences, that is not the norm.
|
And just because something doesn't happen in yours, doesn't mean it never happens. Spend less time in "social" alliances and you might be surprised.
Quote:
|
Are you even reading what I'm replying to? You argued that sins had no farms other than farms "that matter" (either you forgot the "don't" or were trying to be sarcastic, I dunno) and you asked me to give an example other than UWSC.
|
Evidently, you're having reading comprehension problems again. I made no such argument, so put that strawman away. I said to come up with a subset of farms that ONLY sins could do, and I even gave you a distilled series of steps to reach that subset.
Quote:
Protting requires timing and battlefield awareness. If you just start hitting keys, your team will die. 1 > 2 > 3 for a perma gives you invincibility.
After that, you can do whatever the hell you want. Just make sure you do it again before SF runs out. There's no possible argument that that is difficult and you're well aware of that. So, you cover that up with childish remarks, insults, and half-baked arguments.
|
And accomplish nothing. See above, my notes about e-management and skill choice. But you're going to disregard that because it doesn't suit your weak argument. And I never said it was difficult. I said it wasn't as simple as you make it out to be.
As for half-baked arguments, please try to be more understanding. Irony meters are too expensive for you to be blowing up 3 of them with every post.
Quote:
|
Sorry. I should have gone to the wiki and read through hundreds of updates to make sure my argument on GWG that Anet won't even listen to is as precise as possible. And yes, that makes me illiterate.
|
No... making arguments based in direct opposition to what is written, setting up weak strawmen, and a general failure of logical reasoning make you seem illiterate.
Quote:
|
If this skill is not nerfed, I will lose much faith in the dev team. To me, it would show they are lazy and have officially given up on GW1.
|
If it is nerfed, it will probably be smiters' booned, because that's the only thing that will shut people like you up. And then I will have lost faith in the dev team, because it means they are lazy and will always go for the low-hanging fruit. Smiters' boon is the perfect example. That was supposed to be an "emergency nerf" to fix the meta for the then-upcoming skill update. How long did the fix take?
Quote:
|
If you didn't work for your e-peen, you didn't earn your e-peen.
|
You do realize that e-peen is a sardonic term, for something that someone thinks makes them a big shot but is not actually any sort of achievement worth recognition. No one "earned" their armor, they just PLAYED A GAME.