Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSephir
Funny, I didn't see you say that. And even if you did- bs. Still haven't proven that I'm not neutral.
|
I could make a very lame joke here about you not being able to understand written text. Would that make you feel better? No, so I'm not going to do it. So next time, don't do it yourself either, especially when irony gets you in the end. My previous post contains a simple metaphoric example, that shows exactly why it's not "bs", but in fact, logic. I'll post the original message below, just to show you that I'm not messing around. Clicking the arrow next to my nickname will take you directly to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meridon
Wanting similar treatment has nothing to do with being neutral if your intentions are wanting others to be as butthurt as you are (in other words, revenge).
|
On the subject of being neutral, you still haven't proven that you were, which you could have, by posting your own proper arguments as mentioned in my previous post. If you had done that, I wouldn't have called you prejudiced.
Quote:
Kid, (...) because you were born yesterday. Your wall of text with which you're trying to sound all intelligent and save your face is cute and all but instead of "thinking" which isn't something that's working out for you, you could just use COMMON SENSE.
|
One Ad Hominem after another... and another.... and another... and another. The irony of this is that Ad Hominem fallacies are a lovely example of the subject's own inability to engage in serious discussion. Here's some common sense for you: Making fun of people in a discussion, calling them all sorts of things, and not actually making any valuable contributions is
bad. I said this before, and I just said it again. Hopefully you won't ignore the message this time.
Quote:
...the 600 discussion is a dead horse. No one's going to explain it to you all over again. (...) When someone says "nerf SF" I know what he means and even tho he didn't give any reasons of his own there are still plenty of reasons to do so, listed by others here and in thousands of other threads.
|
Do you seriously think that I haven't read any of the arguments posted by other users in this thread, or was unable to come up with any other myself? This, again, is not the point. Of course I have read them. However, some I agree with, some I don't agree with. In the end, I post my own opinion, backed up by my own arguments. If I happen to agree with someone's arguments to a serious extent, I quote them for it. How am I supposed to know which arguments you agree with if you don't post or quote them? I could of course, guess them, and make assumptions. Like the assumption that I made that you were posting out of revenge for the nerfing of your favorite farming skill. You didn't like that. If you don't like me assuming things, don't make me do so.
Quote:
Don't get all upset because people refuse to "discuss" with you why they think Earth revolves around the Sun and not the other way around.
Oh, and more. No one's going to repeat himself for you because, well... who are you?
|
I'm glad to inform you that I'm not upset, but thank you for your compassion. It is very much appreciated because we all know you are such an important figure who we all care so much about. Me and my friends all love you and want your babies. Luckily, I'm quite used to dealing with people who have the disability to have a normal discussion, and instead resort to more insulting manners in order to sound strong. Reading posts on forums like these and replying to them brings nothing new.
tl, dr: Stop insulting and making fun of people, and next time first post why you think something. It saves a lot of drama.