Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RTSFirebat
I don't see what the big deal with dual-wielding is... if people think its going to equal more damage, then yes... if they think more speed... I'd say no.
How would you balance it? If a Warrior was using two sword (Lets say short swords) and was able to land DOUBLE the number of hits they can now, it would be over kill. Sure the lose the benefits of an offhand armor from sheild... but 16 armor isn't that great anyhow... plus they able able to add mods to the two weapons of compensate for it. I just think dual-wielding is a pointless idea which would be unbalanced. Unless only give a MINOR damage advantage... and I mean minor. Next your have Rangers using Cross-bows ![]() |




