Quote:
|
Originally Posted by I D E L E T E D I
If i want to H/H i might as well play a single player game. GW is totally boring when not playing with at least 1 other player. I dont want UB removed all i want is for Anet to enforce some sort of balanced groups while still keeping UB alive. Its not fun being rejected by each group just because you are not playing UB. And maybe you have a small group of friends you can always play with. Other people are not as fortunate as you but still want to be able to play in groups without UB. And witht eh current trend of pugs this aint happening.
And i never completed DoA or joined in that Cookie-Cutter fest that was going on down there pre-UB.
|
It's really not hard at all to find someone who is willing to play your style. They are all over this and GWO's forum first off. If you don't want to go that route, there's always meeting people in game. I know for a fact not everyone is running UB. I know for a fact there are a lot of people playing GW who enjoy playing balanced builds.
Your suggestion for Anet forcing limits on how many people can play UB in a group is severely flawed. Say, Anet limits it to two UB per group. What does this mean? It means that 6 other people (who might have wanted to use UB) now can't. So basically, I am being dictated to on how to play the game, not only by Anet, but by whoever puts UB on their skill bar first.
Then, where would it end. You'd have to basically do the same thing for a lot more skills. No more than two eles using fire magic, no more than two barrage rangers in a group, no more than two players with protective spirit on their bar (god I hope it's the monks who have it). Surely you see where this is going.
Also, maybe everyone doesn't want to play a balanced group. Maybe I like playing three paragons, or three barragers, why should Anet determine how I set up my group huh? Look at it this way, right now, you have a choice to play however you want, with whomever you want. No one can force you to do anything, isn't that better than not having a say so in the matter?