Petition to Demand a Response from Anet on Botting

Akimb0

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jul 2005

Rt/N

/signed.

Really, I can't believe they let it get so bad.

Terra Xin

Terra Xin

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Mar 2006

New Zealand

Me/R

I thought they had responded to botting already...

Zahr Dalsk

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Aug 2007

Canada

Quote:
Originally Posted by snaek View Post
gw would be awesome if the only classes in it were paragons, dervishes, assassins, and ritualists.
Interesting, sure, and I imagine they could get a more balanced game with more flexible classes, but certainly not something that could be implemented now.

QueenofDeath

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jul 2009

Just take out interupt skills and you'll kill 3 birds with one stone. Annoying interupts, mesmers and rangers. )

snaek

snaek

Forge Runner

Join Date: Mar 2006

N/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Del View Post
fixed that for you
but bringing those classes into the game was clearly the best thing that has ever happened to gw.


back on topic...
Quote:
Originally Posted by queenofdeath
Just take out interupt skills and you'll kill 3 birds with one stone. Annoying interupts, mesmers and rangers.
interrupt bots will be gone sure, but what about the other kinds of bots such as the monk-enhancing bots? only more bots will continue to develop unless something is done or until they get bored (i.e. have moved on to gw2).

Sarevok Thordin

Sarevok Thordin

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Apr 2006

Scotland

W/N

Quote:
Originally Posted by snaek View Post

interrupt bots will be gone sure, but what about the other kinds of bots such as the monk-enhancing bots? only more bots will continue to develop unless something is done or until they get bored (i.e. have moved on to gw2).
True this, I'm starting to notice monk bots that auto-stop on detecting a bull's.

Showtime

Showtime

Forge Runner

Join Date: Sep 2005

WTB Q9+5e Bows/Q8 14^50 Weapons

R/P

Anet wants you be done with GW so you will move on to GW2 in a year. In the meantime, they'd rather have a crapload of bots playing than empty servers.

Ninja Ninja

Ninja Ninja

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Dec 2006

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Showtime View Post
Anet wants you be done with GW so you will move on to GW2 in a year. In the meantime, they'd rather have a crapload of bots playing than empty servers.
Move on to gw2 to encounter the same problems that are happening right now, I'll pass on that.

Septeric

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Mar 2010

TRS-80 land or Colorado... depends on the weather.

House of Septeric

after 25 pages and 12 days...

probably last time i'll chime in on this thread. just wanted to say 2 things.

1. thanks to the mods for keeping this thread open.
2. you just wait anet.. you ain't seen nothing yet... and its your own fault.

Sarevok Thordin

Sarevok Thordin

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Apr 2006

Scotland

W/N

In terms of GW2 there looks to be ALOT more variables that are complex for a bot to pick up on going by the elementalist videos.

But godamn.....this isn't doing much good for people and this game hasn't been on steam too long yet.

lemming

lemming

The Hotshot

Join Date: May 2006

Honolulu

International District [id???]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarlett Romanov View Post
Lol. Anet didn't make Aion. Its made by NCSoft.

The only comments you can see, a response so to speak, are on Gaile's talk page. Rants about how they DO ban people. (Yeah right, I almost posted a link here so people would purposely troll her for such shit.) We aren't getting a response. Anet is pretending this thread and problem do not exist.
http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_...ed_Yet. 3E.3F

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile
Botter, eh? We love nailing botters. I know some people get one a high horse and say that we don't do anything about botters. But I see the reports and I know that we do. And players who are paying attention see "I was banned" threads every day on the fansite forums, leading them to realize "Yes, ArenaNet really is monitoring, researching, asking questions, taking extra looks, and terminating the accounts of those who cheat, exploit, and otherwise abuse the UA." I guess time will tell if this wrong-doer will be nabbed. Maybe it's not if. Maybe it's when. Personally, as a team member and as a player, I'm crossin' my fingers.
That's talking about someone using kuntz's client-side emote display, btw.

merek

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Apr 2010

I am glad Gaile said that and all.. but all I want from Anet is for them to come ON THIS FORUM!! and say:
We appreciate your concerns and we are working on fixing the boting issue we haven't forgotten about GW1 and will not forget about it until GW2 comes out.

or

We appreciate your concerns but we really don't care about guild wars 1 anymore.. we just want to make a few more dollars before GW2. So you just have to deal with the inflated market,farming bots,leeching bots,title bots, RA bots,JQ bots etc. etc. etc.

that's all I want please Anet.. you say you check the forums.. well respond

/endrant again

sunec

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Oct 2006

Denmark

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
That's talking about someone using kuntz's client-side emote display, btw.
Shoo, why are you creditting Kuntz for the Server-To-Client packet injection hack? He has nothing to do with it at all. We all know who made this shizzle (obvious eyes, obvious eyes).

It's pretty sad seeing how bot ranting posts are becoming more and more frequent, and ANet just gets even more quiet than before.

shoyon456

shoyon456

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

D/

You can't demand anything from Anet. This thread won't do anything, and neither will anything you say.

The only thing that communicates a message clearly to large companies is money. Hurt their bottom line and they'll pay attention. If you're dissatisfied with something, don't buy from the in-game store, don't buy the novel when it comes out, and if you're really PO'd tell your friends to stay away from games with the Anet/NCSoft label on them (looking at GW2). That WILL get a response moreso than this little thread.

Karate Jesus

Karate Jesus

Forge Runner

Join Date: Apr 2008

Texas

Reign of Judgment [RoJ]

Me/

Looks like this thread is going to make 30 pages, afterall.

Thanks mods for keeping this thread open and everyone else for letting Anet know what's going on. I've had a few conversations with TK members, and it appears that this is being pushed by the TK as well. Apparently, very few of the Live Team was aware of these issues.

It's beyond pathetic at this point that they haven't responded.

Bob Slydell

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jan 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karate Jesus View Post
It's beyond pathetic at this point that they haven't responded.
Kinda reminds me of Modern Warfare 2 and the Dedicated Server fiasco... 254,000 + people signed a petition demanding Dedi-Server support and no one really responded. Then again I think IW is actually going to flatline and disband, or if that was just a few people leaving.. IIRC.

majoho

majoho

Forge Runner

Join Date: Jul 2006

Denmark

Quote:
Originally Posted by Septeric View Post
2. you just wait anet.. you ain't seen nothing yet... and its your own fault.
Should they be scared?

R_Frost

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jan 2006

California

Me/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terra Xin View Post
I thought they had responded to botting already...
lol they did such a good job all it did was piss-off the community more with the so called previous attempts to deal with them

lemming

lemming

The Hotshot

Join Date: May 2006

Honolulu

International District [id???]

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunec View Post
Shoo, why are you creditting Kuntz for the Server-To-Client packet injection hack? He has nothing to do with it at all. We all know who made this shizzle (obvious eyes, obvious eyes).
Sorry :< He said something on IRC once in response to that video that implied that he figured it out first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shoyon456 View Post
You can't demand anything from Anet. This thread won't do anything, and neither will anything you say.

The only thing that communicates a message clearly to large companies is money. Hurt their bottom line and they'll pay attention. If you're dissatisfied with something, don't buy from the in-game store, don't buy the novel when it comes out, and if you're really PO'd tell your friends to stay away from games with the Anet/NCSoft label on them (looking at GW2). That WILL get a response moreso than this little thread.
We're trying to fix the game we're playing not right now, not the one that we might be playing in a year's time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by majoho View Post
Should they be scared?
If they're reading that other forum, yes.

shoyon456

shoyon456

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

D/

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post

We're trying to fix the game we're playing not right now, not the one that we might be playing in a year's time.
Indeed, but we have to remember that we're asking this from the same people who took what, well over a year (or was it two?) to legitimately nerf shadow form. I think that digging into the profit they're pulling in will work faster than yelling for shadow form to get nerfed at the very least. I only said I was looking at GW2 because we all know that since 2007 GW1 has been the red-haired stepchild for Anet. They don't really care to the same extent they used to. However, they will care if their profits start taking a hit.

DigitalFear

DigitalFear

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Jul 2009

My mother's basement.

Me/

Quote:
Originally Posted by shoyon456 View Post
Indeed, but we have to remember that we're asking this from the same people who took what, well over a year (or was it two?) to legitimately buff shadow form.
Fixed that for ya.

But your point's still valid nonetheless.

Missing HB

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Mar 2010

Anna

A/

[bots] guild running 2 bot tease mesmers with 7 rupts ( no rez ) + bsurger . Monks cant cast anything , and melee cant hit , this is really getting annoying ... Some people do get banned because they have inapropriated name , but other are still messing everything

2_fingers

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Jul 2005

Mo/W

well... I've played Aion at the release... was a major disappointment -- bots were running all over the place, gold sellers were spamming in every city and outpost. I'm not too sure if NCsoft actually wants to figure out how to deal with bots. I dont even think many games can do it, or have the resources to figure out how. I suspect you'd still see bots running rampant even in GW2, even with the 'complex' mechanics. Anet/Ncsoft just needs to work on really waving the banstick. Maybe get a system like Warden from blizzard, idk.

GW1 is not likely to last very long at this rate. Neither will GW2 if this continues.

Move Down

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Jul 2005

W/Mo

waste of time The GM's from NCsoft does nothing.
They just falsly ban you and then close it and make it final and ignore you.
As a player you have no rights just think twice before you play a ncsoft game
i would say

Darth The Xx

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Jul 2008

Sen'jin Village

The Infamous Cake Bandits [cake]

Mo/W

HA weekend ruined by the ridiculous amount of rupt botting. Why add a /report function if you're not going to do anything about it.

Ban a few and it will stop, once you bring out the ban hammer people will get scared and stop using them, if they don't ban the fags for all I care.

Martin Alvito

Martin Alvito

Older Than God (1)

Join Date: Aug 2006

Clan Dethryche [dth]

Does anyone else find it ironic that you can now play with seven heroes by cheating?

Just saying.

Jbrown

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Oct 2007

Tombs Is Srs Business [IWAY]

W/Mo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing HB View Post
[bots] guild running 2 bot tease mesmers with 7 rupts ( no rez ) + bsurger . Monks cant cast anything , and melee cant hit , this is really getting annoying ... Some people do get banned because they have inapropriated name , but other are still messing everything
Thing i don't understand is that you can and will get perma banned for trading too much money/ecto's/zkeys between accounts but you can't get banned for obviously botting on obs mode without a ton of proof...

fenix

fenix

Major-General Awesome

Join Date: Aug 2005

Aussie Trolling Crew HQ - Event Organiser and IRC Tiger

Ex Talionis [Law], Trinity of the Ascended [ToA] ????????????????&#

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2_fingers View Post
well... I've played Aion at the release... was a major disappointment -- bots were running all over the place, gold sellers were spamming in every city and outpost. I'm not too sure if NCsoft actually wants to figure out how to deal with bots. I dont even think many games can do it, or have the resources to figure out how. I suspect you'd still see bots running rampant even in GW2, even with the 'complex' mechanics. Anet/Ncsoft just needs to work on really waving the banstick. Maybe get a system like Warden from blizzard, idk.

GW1 is not likely to last very long at this rate. Neither will GW2 if this continues.
Then they went through and banned 15k bots A MONTH. Problem solved.

ANet just need to pick their act up and ban the more visible bots.

superraptors

superraptors

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Dec 2008

W/

like someone said

All the got to do, is do a mass banning on current dll injectors. Anet needs to implement 3rd party software/gamegaurd stuff or w/e and check for dll injections(Do it secretly without warning). 3/4 of GW pvp bots, not sure about pve. A mass suprise hit to all botters would scare alot of people. Keep doing it on a consisten basis. Its not hard to code blocking to accs who have dll injected. I mean anet if u can hear this, what are you paying your coders for, i could probably implement someshit that checks for dll injections. It really is not hard.

All they have to do is implment some VAC steam shit pretty sure its 3rd party so just buy the rights to it cause most likely they would also use it for gw2 aswell.

Say even though hackers are trying to bypass the 3rd party protection, they would have to spend hours and hours to develop coding and encrypting shit, this will atleast curb the amount of hackers.

Also you know what, 3/4 of gw know where to get the script and bots running these scripts from. It isnt hard for them to just look at the hacking code and counter it.

Anyways if they arent gonna do a update for gw1 to do this, im positive they will be doing this for gw2 however.

If they do it now, they will gain alot of players respect who probably wont buy gw2 because they arent doing anything to fix gw1 atm. This is putting off alot of legit pvp players and pve.

you can say dead game blablabla

my 2cents

Gill Halendt

Gill Halendt

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Mar 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by superraptors View Post
Do it secretly without warning
And then ban (with an automated suspension) all those who use KSMod with the dll-injection detector in place without knowing.

Great idea. [*rolleyes*]

superraptors

superraptors

Grotto Attendant

Join Date: Dec 2008

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill Halendt View Post
And then ban (with an automated suspension) all those who use KSMod with the dll-injection detector in place without knowing.

Great idea. [*rolleyes*]
if ur dll injecting ur hacking srry

Eragon Zarroc

Eragon Zarroc

Atra estern?? ono thelduin

Join Date: Jan 2008

Madness Incarnate

[Duo]

W/P

just sounds to me like botting is ruining pvp. meh, pvp.

Coverticus

Coverticus

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jan 2006

The Zodiac Elites [TZE]

Mo/

Quote:
Originally Posted by superraptors View Post
if ur dll injecting ur hacking srry
And to all those innocent people using the ANet-approved TexMod, which also uses injection techniques?

I don't want to re-iterate any of this again, as it got tiresome earlier in this thread but certainly this is where ANet have to be very careful indeed.

Eragon Zarroc

Eragon Zarroc

Atra estern?? ono thelduin

Join Date: Jan 2008

Madness Incarnate

[Duo]

W/P

Ying! how you doing man?! still playing or just posting some? ;-)

oops, a little off-topic there....uhhhh....BOTS ARE BAD!

Missing HB

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Mar 2010

Anna

A/

But i think it was said that Texmod was allowed ( obvious anyway , looking how hard ( but not impossible ) cartographer title is , with all bad corners , etc... ) .

Every PvP place is having more and more bots anyway ( especially HA ,but also GvG and RA ) , so i 'll say it again ( yes again :/ ) , if nothing is done , it would be nice to have one place where we can use heroes( or even henchs ) ( for ex full heroes in HA ) , so that you dont have to waste hours forming , resulting in a lose to bot ( which happens a lost these days ) , then everyone getting mad and leaving .

Ninja Ninja

Ninja Ninja

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Dec 2006

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coverticus View Post
And to all those innocent people using the ANet-approved TexMod, which also uses injection techniques?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing HB View Post
But i think it was said that Texmod was allowed ( obvious anyway , looking how hard ( but not impossible ) cartographer title is , with all bad corners , etc... ) .
Anet has never allowed or approved textmod usage, its just not something they go out and punish like botting.

Gill Halendt

Gill Halendt

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Mar 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninja Ninja View Post
Anet has never allowed or approved textmod usage, its just not something they go out and punish like botting.
Off course they have never punished those mods like botting, but implementing an automatic injection detector as suggested will get those using both KSMod and TexMod banned, as both mods rely on injection to function properly.

It's not a matter of "allowed" or not: a detector can't tell wether you're injecting for an allowed mod or for a bot, and will dish out a ban regardless. Unless they just implement a passive detector that allarms about injection, and then the eventual suspension is handled manually. Good luck then, they'll be getting millions of false allarms every hour, just because of the aforementioned mods.

So, they either make people aware of this BEFORE implementing it, or half this forum will likely end up having his/her account suspended all of a sudden. Fine with me, but as a KSMod user, I'd like to now wether such a feature is being implemented BEFORE being banned.

Eragon Zarroc

Eragon Zarroc

Atra estern?? ono thelduin

Join Date: Jan 2008

Madness Incarnate

[Duo]

W/P

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill Halendt View Post
Fine with me, but as a KSMod user, I'd like to now wether such a feature is being implemented BEFORE being banned.
the catch22 of that is that it would alert all the botters, lmao. although i suppose it would still stop them from botting which is the ultimate goal ;-)

Kattar

Kattar

EXCESSIVE FLUTTERCUSSING

Join Date: Mar 2007

SMS (lolgw2placeholder)

Me/

Texmod isn't really relevant to this discussion anyway. Let's not add pages of off topic chat for ANet to shift through.

Thanks.

Coverticus

Coverticus

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jan 2006

The Zodiac Elites [TZE]

Mo/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninja Ninja View Post
Anet has never allowed or approved textmod usage, its just not something they go out and punish like botting.
Sigh. I'm not having this sodding argument yet again - please ArenaNet's comments here. This has been discussed too many times now.

And while I agree with Kattar's statement to a degree, unfortunately a potential solution does bring TexMod into the conversation.

Back onto topic though - as a programmer myself, I would rather they take a more detailed approach and solution to this than just put in a quick fix that will, as Gil highlights, be an overwhelming amounts of false alarms. To me, what ANet do as the solution will have some sway in me buying GW2.

PS: Hi Eragon, long time no speak! -waves-