Saying it again, just because.
Remove grind and you remove bots.
Grind should not be in GW in the first place. So remove it.
Remove grind and you remove bots.
Grind should not be in GW in the first place. So remove it.
|
This.
Don't reward bad behavior, and bad behavior will cease. Let's hope ANet understands that in designing GW2... Hmmm... for the majority of casual players, bots don't really matter. So, are there so many casual and bot players that "serious" gamers aren't a target audience? I know that's why game AI isn't very smart (I've worked for game companies as a programmer/designer) -- make the AI too smart (i.e., challenging), and it chases away the casuals. In the case of bots, why put effort into stopping a behavior that negatively impacts a very tiny portion of the player community? |
|
This thread is ridiculous... everyone is /signing demanding a response from Anet?
Have any of you thought about what would happen if Anet was more "transparent" about an issue as delicate as botting? tl:dr A thread demanding information leading to the banning of bots is a double edged sword and will reduce the effecency of bot detection that Anet might employ, decreasing the number of bots banned, and leaving the issue partly unresolved. A petition asking players to sign if they are overly offended by bots is a good way to let Anet know we as a community have had enough. But demanding information? Not the way to go. |
|
Sorry, i didn't make it clear what i meant in my first post. I meant that saying the fact that interupt bots are in fact computer AI scripts and "of course you can just cancel cast" to invalidate them is a really dumb argument for the exact reasons you say.
By saying this "just cancel cast and their at the bots at disadvantage" you're forcing your team to double energy cost of every important skill they use, which while it may work in HA as matches are a lot shorter and hur dur channeling, for monks/midline in GvG it ruins you. As soon as monks take pressure or you have to make a push to correct a mistake etc you just cannot afford the energy to cancel cast, whereupon the bot may well rape you when it lands rupts. It's much more prevailent in GvG because energy management is harder than in HA, and having to regular cancel your example of WoH/RC will eventually ruin your monks. |
|
So i raise your altar cap of "just KD the interupt bot", with a guardian and one of many teams 2 copies of aura of stability.
|
|
HENCHMAN CONTEST: Now we have a constant reminder of some cheaters in our guild halls. To quote you a second time "GG Anet".
|
|
So what do you suggest? Since anet will not address the botting issue, there's not really any other things you can do to counter the bot. As of this moment, The most effective way is to cancel cast. It is logical that you cancel cast since if you do not cancel cast, you will lose energy PLUS suffer additional drawback from the interrupt bot (dshot, powerblock, power leak, etc...). If you cancel cast, you will only suffer the energy loss and nothing else. If you know of any other ways, enlighten me. Most likely, this will not happen. No high ranked teams ever bring 2 copies of aura of stability so I will assume low ranked teams also do not bring 2 copies of aura of stability. During the crucial moment of the teams' ghost capping the altar, the only focus the prot monk has in mind should be the ghostly hero and the song of concentration (SoC) person. I believe putting guardian on the SoC person is a smarter thing to do compare to putting guardian on the interrupt bot to prevent it from being kd. Besides, warriors in HA brings shock so that renders guardian useless. Unless you have a more effective way of countering these interrupt bots, you can't really say that the method I put forth is an asinine one. |
|
So what do you suggest? Since anet will not address the botting issue, there's not really any other things you can do to counter the bot. As of this moment, The most effective way is to cancel cast. It is logical that you cancel cast since if you do not cancel cast, you will lose energy PLUS suffer additional drawback from the interrupt bot (dshot, powerblock, power leak, etc...). If you cancel cast, you will only suffer the energy loss and nothing else. If you know of any other ways, enlighten me. |
| Most likely, this will not happen. No high ranked teams ever bring 2 copies of aura of stability so I will assume low ranked teams also do not bring 2 copies of aura of stability. During the crucial moment of the teams' ghost capping the altar, the only focus the prot monk has in mind should be the ghostly hero and the song of concentration (SoC) person. I believe putting guardian on the SoC person is a smarter thing to do compare to putting guardian on the interrupt bot to prevent it from being kd. |
| Unless you have a more effective way of countering these interrupt bots, you can't really say that the method I put forth is an asinine one. |
|
The other type of bot is one that performs monotonous tasks, generally farming something or spamming an action to pump a title up. Most of these are run while the actual player is afk. These have little or indirect effect on other players or sometimes the in-game economy, but give an unfair advantage for maxing titles to those willing to take on the risk.
|
|
I blame the builds that are so retard easy that a bot could do it.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ninja Ninja
Since the second type is pre programed would changing the player spawns in town get rid of it?
|
|
Some bots are actually capable of determining every skill that your opponent/oppenent's team has and then responding based on that. It's not because the builds are easy......often bots can run builds that no human could run.
|
|
Yeah but they follow a pre set trail, changing the spawn location in town could mess it all up.
|