Correct.
Not sure how well that will work, just a suggestion.
Z
[MERGED - OFFICIAL] Dueling aka 1v1
11 pages • Page 4
A
I
Mesmers and Necromancers can beat warriors with the right spells, thats what they're about, but so can anyone, if you set up your character to battle a certain class your going to have the advantage, unless they have done the same. Although certain classes can be better then others, warrior is naturally way more efficient then others, and very few can withstand an onslaught for long. You may boast "ultimate healing" capabilities and the like, but a warrior with a hammer can knock you down over and over til your dead. There are ways around every tactic, but Warrior is the easiest and most solid to maintain because thier advantage relies on thier perminant armor and weapon class rather then skills that can be disrupted.
I don't think duels are appropriate unless they are same class duels, but with a few added armors and weapons for every job it could balance out.
I don't think duels are appropriate unless they are same class duels, but with a few added armors and weapons for every job it could balance out.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Loviatar
not just mentioned but beaten to death
for solving a dispute? not just no but hell no that would lead to the uber jerks picking a fight for no reason except they want to on any pretext this is not pit wars it is guild wars |
Also, if you add rewards or anything, it will be HEAVILY exploited...
Rather than betting on 1v1s that last forever, why not have an option to bet on normal battles? 1v1 doesn't seem like too good an idea for such a team-based game...
S
Whether or not this has been suggested already I don't know but I have searched through the recent posts and found none. This is my perception of how I would expect these to work. Okay then lets start.
Duelling
In each Arena or within a Guild Hall beside the trade option there would be a duel option. When you select duel a sub-menu would pop up.
-> Rewards (Battles for items or cash) -Arena Only-
Similar to trade except once the items offered have been accepted by both parties the 2 parties would then fight for the items.
-> Rank (Battling for Member/Officer/ Leader Rank) -Guild Hall Only-
Inviting a new member
When someone is invited to the guild you would be able now be able to "Accept" them or "Challenge" them. "Accept" would have it work same as it always has. A "Challenge" would result in both people (the officer and contender) to battle it out. The officer at the end of the battle would then decide to "Accept" or "Decline" the contender entrance to the guild.
Achieving Rank
Those who already are members can simply be appointed power within the guild (how it is currently). Or can "Challenge" each other for positions. A Member could not challenge another Member, but a Member may "Challenge" a Officer for his/her rank. To achieve Leader you must hold the Officer Rank first.
-> Exhibition (Nothings at risk purely fun) -Arena Only-
This is simply a 1 vs 1 match resulting in no reward. You would enter a 1 vs 1 match against your selected opponent.
So you've heard my idea now what are you thoughts? Any idea to fix this or patch it? Find any possible problems?
Duelling
In each Arena or within a Guild Hall beside the trade option there would be a duel option. When you select duel a sub-menu would pop up.
-> Rewards (Battles for items or cash) -Arena Only-
Similar to trade except once the items offered have been accepted by both parties the 2 parties would then fight for the items.
-> Rank (Battling for Member/Officer/ Leader Rank) -Guild Hall Only-
Inviting a new member
When someone is invited to the guild you would be able now be able to "Accept" them or "Challenge" them. "Accept" would have it work same as it always has. A "Challenge" would result in both people (the officer and contender) to battle it out. The officer at the end of the battle would then decide to "Accept" or "Decline" the contender entrance to the guild.
Achieving Rank
Those who already are members can simply be appointed power within the guild (how it is currently). Or can "Challenge" each other for positions. A Member could not challenge another Member, but a Member may "Challenge" a Officer for his/her rank. To achieve Leader you must hold the Officer Rank first.
-> Exhibition (Nothings at risk purely fun) -Arena Only-
This is simply a 1 vs 1 match resulting in no reward. You would enter a 1 vs 1 match against your selected opponent.
So you've heard my idea now what are you thoughts? Any idea to fix this or patch it? Find any possible problems?
t
P
i think one on one is good, so if you want to fight a friend or want to challenge somebody to a duel you can do it. What would be cool is to send an invitation and if accepted you are now enemies and can fight each other. I think it would be cool to see two people fighting to the death in lions arch or the granite citadel etc. The person who loses falls on his face. COOL. Person who wins gets to choose an item from dead guy and gets a set some of money (100gp?), this would reduce a load of people just scrapping it out all over the place. It would introduce a fun, random, exciting aspect. Two people duelling it out people crowding round to watch.........
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
G
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Prince Daniel
i think one on one is good, so if you want to fight a friend or want to challenge somebody to a duel you can do it. What would be cool is to send an invitation and if accepted you are now enemies and can fight each other. I think it would be cool to see two people fighting to the death in lions arch or the granite citadel etc. The person who loses falls on his face. COOL. Person who wins gets to choose an item from dead guy and gets a set some of money (100gp?), this would reduce a load of people just scrapping it out all over the place. It would introduce a fun, random, exciting aspect. Two people duelling it out people crowding round to watch.........
Thoughts? |
P
Maybe this thread doesn't belong here but I'd like to give my two cents. I went to the official Guild Wars site and there stood that I should write on one of these forums for suggestions.
This game "Guild Wars" got one of the best PvP-systems out there. How about a 1 on 1 arena ?
For example:
1. I go to a "Guild Challenger" in a specific arena.
2. I invite the one I'd like to challenge and he/she accepts.
3. I invite spectators who would like to observe our match.
4. When all are ready, we start the match.
The playerboard could look like this for example:
-Board-
!! Players !!
* Player 1 ( red team )
* Player 2 ( blue team )
!! Spectators !!
* Spectator 1
* Spectator 2
* Spectator 3
* Spectator 4
* Spectator 5
I think that many players out there would like this too.
What do you think ?
This game "Guild Wars" got one of the best PvP-systems out there. How about a 1 on 1 arena ?
For example:
1. I go to a "Guild Challenger" in a specific arena.
2. I invite the one I'd like to challenge and he/she accepts.
3. I invite spectators who would like to observe our match.
4. When all are ready, we start the match.
The playerboard could look like this for example:
-Board-
!! Players !!
* Player 1 ( red team )
* Player 2 ( blue team )
!! Spectators !!
* Spectator 1
* Spectator 2
* Spectator 3
* Spectator 4
* Spectator 5
I think that many players out there would like this too.
What do you think ?
H
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by arnansnow
This idea has been done millions of times before, and is not all that good of an idea in my opinion.
In 1v1, A good mesmer would destroy all, Backfire would kill the mages, empathy and Spirit of Failure would kill the Warriors and Rangers. Please search the forums before posting a thread. |
Don't listen to him Paine. If you're saying a mesmer could destroy all then you could also say that all rangers suck with no doubt. 1 on 1 is a great idea!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hentai
lol..
Don't listen to him Paine. If you're saying a mesmer could destroy all then you could also say that all rangers suck with no doubt. 1 on 1 is a great idea! |
EDIT: sorry I meant what could kill a MESMER 1v1, not ranger.
H
P
S